Blog
Navigating Arkansas’ Sentencing Guidelines for Tax Evasion Offenses
Contents
- 1 Navigating Arkansas’ Sentencing Guidelines for Tax Evasion Offenses
- 2 Arkansas Tax Evasion Laws: The Statutes You Need to Know
- 3 Understanding Arkansas’ Sentencing Guidelines for Tax Crimes
- 4 Example Arkansas Tax Evasion Sentencing Scenarios
- 5 Building an Effective Arkansas Tax Evasion Defense
- 6 When to Hire an Arkansas Tax Crime Lawyer
Arkansas Tax Evasion Laws: The Statutes You Need to Know
In Arkansas, tax evasion falls under the state’s laws prohibiting “failure to pay tax, file returns, keep records, etc.” The relevant statute is Arkansas Code 26-18-201, which outlines the various offenses and their classifications as misdemeanors or felonies.
Here are the key tax crimes defined under this statute:
Failure to Pay Tax or File Returns (§26-18-201(5))
- Failing to pay tax owed to the state
- Failing to file required tax returns
- Classified as a Class A misdemeanor
Failure to Keep Records (§26-18-201(6))
- Failing to keep proper records for tax purposes
- Classified as a Class A misdemeanor
Tax Evasion (§26-18-201(7)(A))
- Willfully attempting to evade or defeat any tax imposed by Arkansas law
- Classified as a Class D felony
Willful Failure to Collect/Account for Tax (§26-18-201(7)(B))
- Willfully failing to collect, account for, or pay over any tax
- Classified as a Class D felony
As you can see, tax evasion itself is considered a Class D felony under Arkansas law. This is the most serious offense, as felonies typically carry harsher penalties than misdemeanors. The statute also outlines potential punishments, including fines up to $10,000 and imprisonment up to 6 years for Class D felonies like tax evasion. However, these are just the statutory maximums. Your actual sentence will be calculated based on Arkansas’ sentencing guidelines, which take into account multiple factors related to the offense and your criminal history. Let’s take a closer look at how that works.
Understanding Arkansas’ Sentencing Guidelines for Tax Crimes
Like many states, Arkansas has implemented standardized sentencing guidelines to promote consistency and proportionality in criminal sentencing. The guidelines establish a matrix of “presumptive sentences” based on two key factors:
- The offense level, which is a score representing the severity of the crime
- The offender’s criminal history
For tax evasion cases, the offense level is determined using the Fraud guideline in Section 5 of Arkansas’ Criminal Offenses guideline manual.2 This guideline scores the offense based on characteristics like:
- The tax loss amount involved
- Whether sophisticated means were used
- If the offense violated a position of trust
- The offender’s role in the offense (e.g. leader, minor participant)
The offense is then assigned a base level, which can be adjusted upwards or downwards based on those specific characteristics. Tax loss amount is usually the biggest factor – the higher the loss, the higher the offense level.
For example, let’s say an offender is convicted of evading $120,000 in Arkansas state taxes, which is in the $100,000 to $500,000 loss range. The base offense level for that amount is 20.2 If the offense also involved sophisticated means like use of offshore accounts, that would add 2 more levels for a total offense level of 22. The other key factor is the offender’s criminal history category, which is scored from I to VI based on the number and severity of any prior convictions and sentences. Someone with no criminal record would be a Category I. Once the offense level and criminal history are calculated, the judge consults the Sentencing Table to determine the presumptive guideline range.3 For an offense level 22 and criminal history category I, the range is 41-51 months of imprisonment. However, it’s important to note that these are just advisory guidelines. The judge maintains discretion to depart from the range if there are aggravating or mitigating circumstances.
Hiring an experienced Arkansas tax crime defense lawyer is crucial to arguing for a sentence towards the lower end or a departure below the range. To illustrate the impact criminal history can have, let’s look at the same $120,000 tax evasion scenario but with a category III criminal history. The guideline range jumps from 41-51 months all the way up to 57-71 months.3 Your prior record can significantly increase your exposure.
So in summary, the Arkansas sentencing guidelines calculate a presumptive range based on:
- Scoring the tax evasion offense level based on characteristics like tax loss amount
- Determining the offender’s criminal history category
- Cross-referencing the offense level and criminal history on the Sentencing Table
While the guidelines standardize the process, an experienced defense attorney can make a huge difference in arguing for a lower offense level scoring and mitigating factors to reduce the ultimate sentence. With that framework in mind, let’s look at some common scenarios and what kind of sentences offenders may face under the Arkansas guidelines.
Example Arkansas Tax Evasion Sentencing Scenarios
To give you a better sense of how sentencing can play out, here are some hypothetical examples of different tax evasion cases and potential sentences:Example 1: First-Time Offender, $75,000 Tax Loss
- Offense: Tax Evasion under §26-18-201(7)(A)
- Tax Loss: $75,000
- No aggravating factors like sophisticated means
- Offender has no prior criminal convictions (Criminal History I)
Likely Sentence:
- Base Offense Level 18 (tax loss $40,000-$100,000)
- No adjustments for lack of aggravating factors
- Final Offense Level 18
- Guidelines range with Criminal History I: 27-33 months
- Likely sentence towards lower end, possibly 27-30 months
For a first-time offender with a relatively lower tax loss amount and no aggravating factors, the guidelines range starts out relatively low at 27-33 months. An effective defense could potentially argue for a sentence even lower than that range.
Example 2: Offender with Prior Record, Higher Tax Loss
- Offense: Tax Evasion under §26-18-201(7)(A)
- Tax Loss: $425,000
- Offense involved sophisticated means (+2 offense levels)
- Offender has prior convictions putting them in Criminal History III
Likely Sentence:
- Base Offense Level 22 (tax loss $350,000-$550,000)
- +2 levels for sophisticated means = 24
- Final Offense Level 24
- Guidelines range with Criminal History III: 63-78 months
- Likely sentence towards higher end, e.g. 70-78 months
With a higher tax loss amount, use of sophisticated means, and a prior criminal record, this offender is facing a much higher guidelines range of 5-6 years. The defense would have an uphill battle to mitigate below that range.
Example 3: Business Owner, Failure to Pay Over Taxes
- Offense: Willful Failure to Collect/Account for Tax under §26-18-201(7)(B)
- Tax Loss: $225,000 (from willful failure to pay over sales taxes)
- Offender was the owner of the business
- No prior criminal record (Criminal History I)
Likely Sentence:
- Base Offense Level 20 (tax loss $100,000-$250,000)
- Potential adjustments for aggravating role, violating a position of trust
- Assuming two-level adjustment, Final Offense Level 22
- Guidelines range with Criminal History I: 41-51 months
- Likely sentence in the middle, e.g. 45-48 months
For this business owner who willfully failed to pay over sales taxes owed, the guidelines range starts in the 41-51 month range. Adjustments for their aggravating role could push it towards the higher end. An argument could be made for a role reduction as a first-time offender. These are just examples to illustrate how different factors can impact sentencing under the Arkansas guidelines. Every case is highly dependent on the specific facts and circumstances. The important takeaway is that an experienced Arkansas tax crime defense lawyer is essential to:
- Arguing for the lowest possible offense level scoring based on the facts
- Seeking adjustments for any mitigating factors
- Making a strong case for a sentence towards the lower end of the range or a departure below it
With so much at stake and the guidelines being just advisory, you want the best representation possible to minimize the consequences. Don’t take chances with your future. Now let’s look at some key strategies and considerations for building an effective defense against Arkansas tax evasion charges.
Building an Effective Arkansas Tax Evasion Defense
Being charged with tax evasion can feel overwhelming, but remember – you have constitutional rights and there are many potential defenses available. Here are some of the key strategies your Arkansas tax crime lawyer may pursue:
Challenging the “Willfulness” Element
For charges under §26-18-201(7)(A) and (B), the prosecution must prove that your conduct was “willful” – meaning you knew your actions were unlawful, not just that you were negligent or made a mistake. Lack of willfulness is a very common defense. Your lawyer may argue that you had a good-faith belief that you were complying with the law based on a plausible interpretation of complex tax rules. Or that there was no deliberate attempt to evade taxes, just sloppy bookkeeping.
Questioning the Tax Loss Calculation
As we saw, the alleged tax loss amount is a huge driver of your offense level and potential sentence under the guidelines. Your lawyer will scrutinize how the IRS or state auditors calculated that number to look for any errors or improper assessments that can be challenged. Reducing the tax loss figure even modestly can have a major impact by lowering your offense level and guidelines range. This is a critical area for your defense.
Arguing for Mitigating Factors and Departures
Even if you are convicted, your lawyer can fight for adjustments and departures from the guidelines for mitigating factors like:
- Your role and degree of culpability compared to co-defendants
- Efforts towards compliance and paying back taxes owed
- Exceptional circumstances reducing your culpability
- Acceptance of responsibility through a plea agreement
Presenting a strong package of mitigating evidence and legal arguments is key to trying to reduce your ultimate sentence.
Negotiating a Favorable Plea Agreement
In some cases, your best option may be to pursue a plea agreement with the prosecution. An experienced tax crime lawyer can negotiate a plea to reduced charges or advocate for sentencing terms like probation rather than incarceration. The key is having skilled representation to leverage the strengths of your case and craft a plea that minimizes the consequences as much as possible.
Challenging the Charges on Constitutional Grounds
Depending on the circumstances, there may be grounds to challenge the charges themselves on constitutional issues like:
- Unlawful searches and seizures violating your 4th Amendment rights
- Prosecutorial misconduct violating your 5th Amendment due process rights
- Improper grand jury proceedings
These types of challenges can potentially get charges reduced or even dismissed if successful. The bottom line is that you have rights, and an experienced Arkansas tax crime defense lawyer will explore every possible avenue and strategy to avoid a conviction or mitigate the sentencing consequences.Tax charges are extremely serious, but a skilled legal team can make a huge difference. Don’t just plead guilty and accept the maximum penalties – get the representation you deserve to fight for the best possible outcome.
When to Hire an Arkansas Tax Crime Lawyer
If you’re under investigation or have been charged with tax evasion or related offenses in Arkansas, it’s absolutely critical that you hire a qualified tax crime lawyer as soon as possible. The consequences are far too severe to try and navigate this alone. An experienced tax crime attorney can start protecting your rights and building your defense strategy from day one. Look for a firm that specializes in Arkansas tax crime cases and has extensive experience in areas like:
- IRS and state tax audits, investigations, and criminal prosecutions
- Negotiating favorable plea agreements
- Challenging forensic accounting evidence
- Mitigating sentencing arguments and guidelines calculations
- Constitutional challenges to criminal tax charges
You’ll also want a firm that has represented clients in Arkansas courts at all levels – from the state district courts all the way up to the Arkansas Supreme Court if needed. Tax crime cases are extremely complex, so you need a true specialist in this area of law, not just a general criminal defense practitioner. Your entire future could be at stake, so it’s worth investing in the best representation possible.
The sooner you involve a qualified Arkansas tax crime lawyer, the sooner they can start building the strongest possible defense strategy and protecting your rights. The time to hire is as soon as you have any inkling that you may be under investigation or face charges. Don’t wait until it’s too late – get the legal representation you need now and maximize your chances of avoiding conviction or minimizing the sentencing consequences.