24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196




When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials



The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation


Louisiana Federal Sentencing Guidelines

March 29, 2024

Louisiana Federal Sentencing Guidelines: What You Need to Know

If you’re facing federal charges in Louisiana, it’s crucial to understand how the federal sentencing guidelines work. These guidelines provide a framework for judges to determine an appropriate sentence based on the specifics of your case. In this article, we’ll break down what you need to know about Louisiana federal sentencing guidelines.

Understanding the Basics of Federal Sentencing Guidelines

The federal sentencing guidelines were created in 1987 to bring more consistency and fairness to the sentencing process. They take into account factors like:

  • The severity of the offense
  • The defendant’s criminal history
  • Any aggravating or mitigating circumstances

Judges use these guidelines as a starting point but ultimately have discretion in determining the final sentence within the recommended range. In some cases, they may depart from the guidelines if there are compelling reasons to do so.As this Quora thread explains, the guidelines assign points based on the specifics of the crime and the offender’s background. These points then correspond to a sentencing range, typically expressed in months of imprisonment.For example, let’s say a defendant is convicted of drug trafficking. The guidelines might recommend a sentence of 70-87 months based on the quantity of drugs involved and the person’s prior convictions. The judge would then decide where within that range the actual sentence should fall.

Offense Levels and Criminal History Categories

Two key components of the federal sentencing guidelines are offense levels and criminal history categories.The offense level is a measure of the severity of the crime. It starts with a base level determined by the specific offense, then gets adjusted up or down based on various factors. Some common adjustments include:

  • Victim-related adjustments (e.g. if the crime involved a vulnerable victim)
  • Role in the offense (e.g. whether the defendant was an organizer or leader)
  • Obstruction of justice
  • Acceptance of responsibility (i.e. pleading guilty)

The final offense level, after all adjustments are made, corresponds to a recommended sentencing range.The criminal history category looks at the defendant’s prior convictions and assigns them points based on factors like:

  • Number of prior convictions
  • Seriousness of prior convictions
  • How recently the prior convictions occurred

More points mean a higher criminal history category (from I to VI), which generally translates to a longer sentence recommendation. First-time offenders with no criminal record would be in Category I.

Departures and Variances from the Guidelines

While the guidelines provide a starting framework, judges can depart from them in certain circumstances. Departures may be based on factors that the guidelines don’t adequately take into account.For example, a judge might depart downward if the defendant provided substantial assistance to the government in investigating or prosecuting another person. Or they might depart upward if the crime resulted in significant physical injury or property damage beyond what’s reflected in the guidelines.Judges can also vary from the guidelines based on the specific facts of the case if they believe the recommended sentence is too harsh or too lenient. As this Forbes article notes, variances have become increasingly common in recent years as more judges push back against what they see as overly punitive recommendations.

Specific Offense Characteristics

Beyond the general guidelines, each offense type has its own set of specific offense characteristics that can impact the sentence. Let’s look at a couple examples.

Drug Offenses

Drug quantity is one of the biggest factors in determining sentences for drug crimes. The guidelines have a drug quantity table that assigns offense levels based on the type and amount of the substance involved.So, if you’re caught with 50 grams of methamphetamine, that’s a Level 24 offense. 500 grams would be a Level 32. The higher the quantity, the more severe the recommended sentence.Other specific offense characteristics for drug crimes include things like:

  • Whether the defendant used violence or made credible threats
  • Whether the defendant was convicted under the “drug kingpin” statute
  • Whether the crime took place near a protected location like a school or playground

Fraud Offenses

For fraud crimes, the primary driver of the offense level is the amount of loss involved. A loss of $6,500 or less would have no impact on the base offense level, while a loss of $550 million or more would increase it by 30 levels.Additional factors that can enhance fraud sentences include:

  • Number of victims
  • Use of sophisticated means to commit the fraud
  • Deriving more than $1 million in gross receipts from a financial institution
  • Endangering the solvency or financial security of a publicly traded company or 100+ individuals

Sentencing Advocacy

While the guidelines provide a starting point, effective sentencing advocacy by your defense lawyer can make a huge difference. An attorney experienced in federal cases will know how to navigate the complexities of the guidelines and make the best case for a favorable outcome.Some key aspects of sentencing advocacy include:

  • Highlighting mitigating factors that justify a lower sentence
  • Challenging any improper calculations or enhancements by the prosecution
  • Presenting evidence and arguments for a downward departure or variance
  • Emphasizing the defendant’s positive characteristics and rehabilitation potential

As this Law.com article explains, effective sentencing advocacy requires a mix of legal analysis, storytelling, and humanizing the defendant. The goal is to paint a complete picture of the individual beyond just the offense conduct.

The Importance of Working With an Experienced Federal Defense Lawyer

Navigating the federal criminal justice system is incredibly complex, with high stakes for the accused. That’s why it’s so important to work with a defense lawyer who has specific experience handling federal cases.Look for an attorney who understands the ins and outs of the federal sentencing guidelines and has a track record of achieving positive results for clients. Be wary of lawyers who dabble in federal defense or make unrealistic promises.As this Reddit thread advises, some good questions to ask a potential lawyer include:

  • How many federal cases have you handled?
  • What percentage of your practice is devoted to federal criminal defense?
  • Have you handled cases similar to mine? What were the outcomes?
  • How often do your federal cases go to trial vs. get resolved through plea bargains?
  • What challenges do you anticipate in my case and how would you approach them?

Choosing the right lawyer can make all the difference in securing a better outcome under the federal sentencing guidelines. Don’t underestimate the importance of having a skilled advocate in your corner.

Frequently Asked Questions

To round out this overview, let’s address some common questions about Louisiana federal sentencing guidelines.

What’s the difference between federal and state sentencing guidelines?

While both federal and state systems have sentencing guidelines, they operate independently from each other. Federal guidelines apply to federal crimes prosecuted in federal court, while Louisiana’s state guidelines apply to violations of state law prosecuted in state court.

Are federal sentences generally harsher than state sentences?

In many cases, yes. Federal sentences tend to be more severe than state sentences for comparable crimes, in part because the federal guidelines are more rigid and prescriptive. However, the specifics always depend on the details of the case.

Can I appeal my sentence if I think it’s too harsh?

Yes, you have the right to appeal your sentence to a higher court. However, the grounds for appeal are limited. Generally, you’d need to show that the judge made a significant procedural error, imposed a sentence above the statutory maximum, or issued a sentence that’s substantively unreasonable. Simply disagreeing with the judge’s decision isn’t enough.

Do I automatically get credit for good behavior in federal prison?

No, there’s no parole in the federal system. However, you can earn up to 54 days off your sentence per year for “good conduct time.” But this isn’t guaranteed and can be forfeited for disciplinary infractions. You’ll serve at least 85% of your sentence even with good time credit.

Can I get probation instead of prison time under the federal guidelines?

It’s possible but rare. The guidelines state that probation should be considered only for the lowest-level offenses by first-time offenders. Even then, there’s no guarantee. In most federal cases, some amount of incarceration is the norm.

The Bottom Line

Louisiana federal sentencing guidelines provide the framework for how judges determine sentences in federal criminal cases. They’re complex and nuanced, taking into account a wide range of factors related to both the offense and the offender.If you’re facing federal charges, the most important thing you can do is work with an experienced defense lawyer who knows how to navigate the guidelines and advocate for the best possible outcome. Don’t try to go it alone in a system that’s stacked against you.While the guidelines may seem rigid and unforgiving, there’s still room for advocacy and argument. A skilled lawyer can make a compelling case for a sentence that’s fair, just, and appropriate under the circumstances.No matter how hopeless things may seem, don’t give up on your case. With the right legal team in your corner, you can fight for a better future and work to put this challenging chapter behind you.

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile



view profile


Associate Attorney

view profile



view profile



view profile



view profile



view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now