Blog
How the False Claims Act Helps Fight Disaster Relief Fraud
How the False Claims Act Helps Fight Disaster Relief Fraud
When disasters like hurricanes, floods, or wildfires strike, the government often provides relief funds to help communities recover. Unfortunately, some dishonest people try to illegally profit from disaster aid programs. The False Claims Act is an important tool for fighting fraud and abuse of government relief funds.
The False Claims Act (FCA) makes it illegal to knowingly submit false claims to the government for payment. It allows whistleblowers to file lawsuits exposing fraud against the government and earn a reward. The FCA helps fight disaster relief fraud by encouraging whistleblowers to come forward when they see abuse of emergency funds.
What is the False Claims Act?
The FCA imposes liability on any person or company that knowingly submits false claims to the federal government for payment. For example, filing for FEMA disaster aid by claiming damage you didn’t actually have. The law allows private citizens with evidence of fraud, known as “relators,” to file lawsuits on behalf of the government against the alleged false claimants. These whistleblower suits are known as qui tam actions.
If the qui tam case is successful, the whistleblower can receive 15-30% of the amount recovered. The FCA provides citizens with a strong financial incentive to expose fraud against the government. Whistleblowers are also protected from retaliation by their employer for filing a qui tam case.
In addition to whistleblower rewards and anti-retaliation provisions, the FCA allows the government to recover treble damages (triple the amount of the fraud) plus penalties from $5,500-$11,000 per false claim. The threat of large financial penalties and whistleblower rewards help deter fraud.
History of the FCA
The False Claims Act has a long history in the U.S. It was originally passed in 1863 during the Civil War, after investigations found military contractors were defrauding the Union Army. Abraham Lincoln promoted the law to combat wartime profiteering and protect the federal treasury.
The law fell into disuse over the years. But amendments in 1986 substantially strengthened the FCA’s whistleblower provisions. Since then, the law has become a major tool for fighting fraud. Over $62 billion has been recovered under the FCA between 1987-2019, per the Department of Justice.
How the FCA Fights Disaster Relief Fraud
The FCA is vital for protecting the integrity of government disaster aid programs. When hurricanes, floods or other disasters strike, huge sums of relief money flow from Washington. The urgent need to help devastated communities re-build creates opportunities for unscrupulous contractors, businesses or individuals to try to wrongly profit.
Types of fraud can include filing inflated damage claims with FEMA or SBA disaster loans, overbilling for recovery work, selling defective products to government relief programs, or misusing grant funds. The FCA allows whistleblowers to privately file suit if they uncover fraud in contracting, claims, or any other area.
For example, after Hurricane Katrina the owners of a Texas company called Falcon Services were prosecuted under the False Claims Act for overbilling the government for maintenance work at a U.S. Navy facility in New Orleans. They paid $7 million to settle the qui tam case.
After Hurricane Maria devastated Puerto Rico in 2017, multiple FCA lawsuits were filed exposing alleged corruption and misuse of relief funds. In one case, the CEO of a contractor called Adjusters International was charged with bribing FEMA officials to win inflated contracts worth $1.8 billion for repair work on the island.
The prospect of large FCA judgments and rewards empowers whistleblowers to take the risk of filing fraud allegations. Their inside knowledge is vital to uncovering abuse of disaster aid programs.
Strengths of the FCA for Fighting Disaster Fraud
The FCA has several important strengths that make it effective at combating fraud in disaster relief and other government programs:
- Financial incentives – Whistleblower reward provisions incentivize insiders to take the risk of filing fraud allegations.
- Anti-retaliation protections – Employees who file FCA suits are legally protected from employer retaliation or discrimination.
- Treble damages – The law’s treble damages multiply the financial consequences of cheating the government.
- Civil prosecutions – The law allows private whistleblowers to pursue fraud cases in civil court on the government’s behalf.
- Public-private partnership – The FCA leverages both public enforcement and private whistleblower initiatives to fight fraud in a public-private partnership.
This combination of incentives and legal powers makes the False Claims Act a potent anti-fraud weapon. The law provides the resources and protections insiders need to come forward when they witness corruption or abuse of government programs.
Weaknesses of the FCA
However, there are some limitations in the FCA’s ability to combat disaster relief fraud:
- It may fail to detect or deter small-scale fraud by individuals, like homeowner filing inflated damage claims.
- Complex contractor fraud can be difficult for outsiders to recognize and properly document for an FCA case.
- Not all insiders are aware of FCA protections, so fraud may go unreported.
- Government agencies sometimes lack adequate staff and resources to pursue all viable FCA cases.
- The law contains provisions that can limit the award amount for whistleblowers in some cases.
While generally effective, the False Claims Act could be even stronger with reforms to expand whistleblower rewards, strengthen anti-retaliation provisions, increase staffing for FCA investigations, and allocate more resources to combat contractor fraud.
Famous FCA Cases Involving Disaster Relief Fraud
Here are some notable examples of False Claims Act cases involving abuses of government disaster aid programs:
- Hurricane Katrina – A Texas contractor paid $7 million to settle alleged FCA violations for overbilling maintenance work at a Navy facility in New Orleans.
- Hurricane Maria – The CEO of a contractor called Adjusters International was criminally charged with bribing FEMA officials to win inflated Puerto Rico repair contracts.
- Hurricane Sandy – A New Jersey contractor paid $300,000 to settle alleged false billing for Sandy clean-up work.
- California Wildfires – A qui tam case led to a $1.5 million settlement over a contractor’s alleged misuse of FEMA funds after California wildfires.
These and other cases show the effectiveness of the FCA at uncovering fraud in disaster aid programs and returning misused funds to the government.
Conclusion
The False Claims Act is one of the government’s most powerful tools for protecting taxpayer funds from unscrupulous fraudsters who try to illegally profit from disasters. The law leverages whistleblower rewards and anti-retaliation protections to encourage insiders to report fraud.
Although the FCA has some limitations, its public-private partnership empowers citizens to help safeguard government relief programs. The law provides vital oversight and accountability for disaster aid spending. By enabling whistleblowers to file fraud lawsuits on the government’s behalf, the False Claims Act helps ensure relief funds reach communities in need instead of lining the pockets of dishonest contractors or businesses.