212-300-5196

Service & Results.

nyc criminal lawyers over 30 years of experienceWe Know How To Win Cases

Spodek Law Group handles tough cases
nationwide, that demand excellence.

Get Free Consultation

Faced 5+ Years in Prison

People Vs Joseph Amico

Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.

Faced 10+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Anna Sorokin

Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.

Faced 3+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Genevieve Sabourin

Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.

Faced Potential Charges

Ghislaine Maxwell Juror

Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.

Why Choose Us

Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.

Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.

We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.

Spodek
Law in the Media

View All

Meet Todd Spodek

WE PROVIDE WHITE GLOVE SERVICE TO CLIENTS
WHO WANT MORE FROM THEIR ATTORNEY

The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.

Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.

In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.

Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group

The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.

We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.

If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.

How Receiving a Civil Investigative Demand Impacts a Company’s SEC Reporting Obligations

By Spodek Law Group | January 24, 2024
(Last Updated On: January 24, 2024)

How Receiving a Civil Investigative Demand Impacts a Company’s SEC Reporting Obligations

When a company receives a civil investigative demand (CID) from a government agency like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), it can have significant implications for the company’s SEC reporting obligations. A CID is essentially an administrative subpoena that compels the production of documents and information related to an investigation. While challenging a CID is difficult, companies should carefully consider their options for responding.

Understanding Civil Investigative Demands

CIDs allow agencies like the SEC to gather large amounts of information, even before formally filing litigation. As explained on the Federal Lawyer site, “civil investigative demands are not subject to court approval. The DOJ, FTC, CFPB, and other agencies can issue civil investigative demands at their discretion.

The grounds for fighting back against a CID are limited. But as the site notes, “companies should not simply assume that they are required to fully comply with a civil investigative demand.” Consulting with legal counsel can help determine if there is any room for negotiating the scope of disclosure.

Weighing the Implications

Receiving a CID from the SEC is not something most companies take lightly. After all, the discovery of wrongdoing can quickly turn a civil investigation criminal. And even in the absence of criminal charges, the SEC can levy hefty financial penalties.

So the stakes are high. As this Reddit comment notes, “100% certain your BIL has been involved in something, it could be something as simple as using a fake currency note.” Carefully reviewing the details of the CID is an important first step.

Key Early Decisions

Among the early decisions a company faces after receiving a CID:

  • Should we inform investors and the public? If so, what should SEC disclosures say?
  • What data and documents does the SEC want? What is the likely cost and burden of compliance?
  • Is there any room to negotiate the scope of disclosure?
  • Should we challenge the CID in court?

The Harvard Corporate Governance site examines the tricky question of whether companies need to publicly disclose investigations. Cases and SEC guidance on this issue have been limited. In general, the existence of an investigation does not necessarily mean litigation is “substantially certain” to occur.

Evaluating Reporting Obligations

Public companies have ongoing reporting obligations to the SEC under federal securities laws. Exactly how receiving a formal SEC investigation impacts those duties depends on the specific facts and circumstances at play.

But in general, companies should carefully consider the following reporting issues:

1. Material Information

If the existence of an SEC investigation reaches the threshold of “material information” under securities laws, prompt disclosure is usually legally required. But as noted above, investigations don’t automatically trigger this duty on their own.

In a recent case, a company was not required to disclose an SEC investigation to investors until the eventual settlement, because the penalty fell below a key numerical threshold. But companies should analyze the qualitative and quantitative factors before concluding an investigation is not material.

2. Risk Factors

Public companies must disclose risk factors in SEC filings like 10-Ks and 10-Qs. Receiving a CID may represent a new regulatory risk factor worth disclosing to investors.

Of course, companies should take care not to reveal confidential details or compromise the investigation itself when describing risk factors. But a general statement may be warranted about the existence of an investigation and potential outcomes.

3. Financial Statements

An SEC investigation could impact the way a company reports contingent liabilities in its audited financial statements. Once again, putting specific numbers down is difficult given the uncertain nature of SEC inquiries. But the auditors may insist on disclosing the general possibility of fines or other expenses resulting from the investigation.

4. Insider Trading

Top officials and insiders privy to the existence of an SEC investigation before it becomes public should be extremely careful in terms of their personal trading activities. Otherwise, it risks allegations of illegal insider trading.

Tread carefully here and consult securities counsel for specific guidance. But when in doubt, erring on the side of caution is wise to avoid trouble down the road.

Strategies for Responding

Receiving a CID plunges companies into uncharted waters fraught with risk. Moving forward requires a thoughtful strategy tailored to the unique situation at hand. But in general, sound crisis management calls for:

  • Assembling the right team of managers, board members, lawyers, auditors, and communications staff;
  • Thoroughly investigating the facts internally before responding externally;
  • Carefully drafting required SEC disclosures to inform investors without inflaming the situation;
  • Preparing company personnel for the possibility of SEC interviews or depositions;
  • Developing a plan for external communications with shareholders, business partners, customers, and the media.

Companies finding themselves in this scenario should know they are not alone. The FTC received enforcement against nearly a dozen CID recipients in recent years alone. Their failures serve as a warning for others to take these investigations seriously from the outset.

While the SEC wields substantial leverage, taking a cooperative posture can pay dividends. Stubborn resistance without a sound legal argument will not serve companies or their investors well over the long haul.

The good news, as explained in this SEC press release, is that “approximately two-thirds of the SEC’s cases involved charges against one or more individuals” rather than companies as a whole. So the focus may quickly shift to certain rogue executives engaged in misconduct without the board’s knowledge.

In any case, SEC inquiries are no small matter, and companies must walk a fine line between defending their interests and avoiding outright confrontation with powerful regulators.

Free Consultation

Testimonials

I was searching for a law firm with some power to help me deal with a warrant in New York . After 6 days I decided to go with Spodek Law Group. It helped that This law firm is well respected by not only the top law firms in New York , but the DA , Judge as well. I...

~Fonder Brandon

5 Stars
It was my good fortune to retain Spodek Law Group for representation for my legal needs. From the beginning, communication was prompt and thorough. Todd, Kenneth and Alex were the first people I worked with and they all made me feel comfortable and confident that the team was going to work hard for me. Everything was explained and any concerns...

~A G

5 Stars
After meeting with several law firms, I chose the Spodek Law Group not only for their professionalism and experience, but for the personal attention given to me right from the initial consultation. It is important to recognize how crucial having the right legal team is when faced with potentially life altering events that impact families and the lives of loved...

~George Cherubini

Spodek Law Group

White Glove Service

We Provide Superior Service, Excellent Results, At A Level Superior To Other Criminal Defense Law Firms. Regardless Of Where Your Case Is, Nationwide, We Can Help You.
View More

Request Free Consultation

Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.

NYC

85 Broad St 30th Floor, New York, NY 10004

212-300-5196

get directions

Los Angeles

611 S Catalina St Suite 222, Los Angeles, CA 90005

212-300-5196

get directions

QUEENS

35-37 36th St, 2nd Floor Astoria, NY 11106

212-300-5196

get directions

BROOKLYN

195 Montague St., 14th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201

212-300-5196

get directions
Call Now!