Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
CIDs are a form of compulsory process similar to subpoenas that the FTC uses to obtain documents, information, and testimony to advance its consumer protection and competition investigations (Search results 1, 2, 6). They allow the FTC to gather facts and data related to potential violations of laws it enforces.
FTC investigations typically start informally, where the FTC gathers publicly available information and contacts the company. If the issue seems significant within the FTC’s jurisdiction, it assigns an attorney-examiner to get more information, which can include issuing a CID (Results 1, 8, 15).
If voluntary compliance is not achieved through the investigation, the FTC may initiate litigation through an administrative proceeding or federal court action. Failure to comply with a CID can also trigger the FTC to take legal action to enforce it (Results 1, 5, 8, 14).
The FTC takes CID compliance seriously. It tries to work with recipients to ease burdens when possible but will compel compliance if needed, including through court orders and contempt charges for disobeying orders. Over the past three years it has filed 12 enforcement actions for non-compliance (Results 6, 19).
Potential outcomes after an investigation using CIDs include the FTC closing it with no action, the company agreeing to a consent decree to settle alleged violations, or the FTC initiating administrative or court proceedings against the company. In rare cases there may be criminal referrals (Results 8, 15).
In summary, CIDs are a critical investigative tool for the FTC. The agency relies on them to determine if consumer protection or antitrust laws have been violated before deciding on potential enforcement actions. Failing to properly respond puts companies at greater risk.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.