Criminal Defense Lawyers

How Conspiracy Laws Target All Involved in Drug Operations

How Conspiracy Laws Target All Involved in Drug Operations

When most people think of drug crimes, they imagine someone getting busted with drugs on them. But there’s a whole other side to drug law enforcement that targets everyone involved in the drug trade, not just those doing the physical trafficking. I’m talking about conspiracy laws.

Conspiracy laws make it a crime to agree with someone else to commit a crime, even if you don’t actually go through with it. When it comes to drugs, conspiracy charges are used to take down entire criminal organizations by targeting both leaders and low-level players. The goal is to disrupt drug operations by getting rid of the people who make them possible.

But these laws are controversial. Critics say they give police and prosecutors too much power, sweeping up minor players and punishing thought crimes. Supporters argue they’re key to dismantling dangerous drug networks. One thing’s for sure – if you have any involvement with illegal drugs, you’re at risk. Let’s break down how conspiracy laws work and who they target.

What is a Criminal Conspiracy?

A criminal conspiracy is an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime. Legally, it requires four elements:

• An agreement between the co-conspirators
• Knowledge of the agreement and illegal objective
• Intent to further the objective
• An overt act in furtherance of the objective

The agreement doesn’t have to be formal or spoken. It can be inferred from people’s actions. Conspiracy laws focus on the planning stages of a crime, not whether the crime was actually carried out. Just agreeing to commit a crime is enough.

Most states and the federal government have general conspiracy laws that apply to all types of crimes. There are also specific conspiracy laws for drug offenses. For example, federal law makes it illegal to conspire to distribute controlled substances.

Who Can Be Charged with Drug Conspiracy?

Because conspiracy laws target the planning of crimes, they can implicate many players with varying levels of responsibility. Here are some of the common targets:

• High-level traffickers: These are the ringleaders who organize drug operations – the bosses, kingpins and cartel leaders. Though insulated from street-level dealing, they can be charged for conspiring with their underlings.
• Mid-level dealers: The managers, distributors and importers who handle large quantities of drugs. They agree to traffic drugs as part of larger conspiracies.
• Low-level dealers: The street dealers and couriers who possess and sell small amounts. They play replaceable roles but can still be roped into conspiracy charges.
• Financiers: The money men who bankroll operations through cash or laundering. They enable trafficking through financial conspiracies.
• Customers: Buyers who regularly purchase from dealers can be accused of conspiring to distribute.
• Peripheral helpers: Drivers, lookouts, warehouse owners, etc. They provide support services knowing drugs are involved.

The common thread is agreement. Prosecutors argue all these players conspire by working together in the drug trade. The conspiracy may involve importing tons of cocaine or just selling dime bags on the corner. If you agree to help in any way, you could be part of it.

Why Are Conspiracy Charges So Useful to Prosecutors?

For law enforcement, conspiracy laws provide some major advantages for dismantling drug operations:

• Sweeping reach: They allow charges against all co-conspirators regardless of role.
• Pre-emptive strikes: They criminalize conduct before drugs are actually sold.
• Flexibility: They can target diverse schemes involving manufacture, transport, financing, etc.
• Harsh penalties: Depending on quantity, they carry the same sentences as trafficking charges.
• Easier convictions: Prosecutors only need to prove agreement, not commission of the crime.

With a wide dragnet, police can initiate takedowns early in the planning stages. And at trial, proving agreement between defendants is simpler than proving they trafficked actual drugs. For these reasons, conspiracy charges are go-to tools for dismantling drug networks top to bottom.

Defense Arguments Against Conspiracy Charges

While prosecutors tout the benefits of conspiracy charges, critics raise civil liberties concerns:

• Guilt by association: Minor players are roped into massive schemes.
• Thought crimes: Mere agreement is criminalized before any real harm is done.
• Speculation: Prosecutors can claim conspiracy using circumstantial inferences.
• Coercion: Conspirators often turn informant against others for reduced charges.
• Disproportionate impact: Low-level offenders face long sentences.

Defense attorneys argue roping bit players into vast conspiracies is unjust, as is punishing intent alone. And speculation about secret agreements invites abuse. But despite criticisms, conspiracy charges remain potent weapons for prosecutors.

Common Defenses Against Conspiracy Charges

Though challenging to beat, some defenses can undermine conspiracy allegations:

• No agreement: The defendant didn’t actually agree to join a conspiracy.
• Withdrawal: The defendant withdrew before any overt acts.
• No knowledge: The defendant didn’t know about the conspiracy’s criminal purpose.
• Entrapment: Government agents improperly induced the defendant to agree.
• Duress: The defendant was forced into agreement against their will.

Lawyers often claim defendants were falsely accused or had no idea drugs were involved. Entrapment defenses argue overzealous undercover cops created conspiracies. Duress claims defendants had no choice but to go along.

But given the loose standards for proving agreement, conspiracy charges are tough to beat. Prosecutors can infer tacit understanding from circumstantial evidence like coded language and frequent contacts. Many defendants cut deals to testify against co-conspirators to avoid long sentences.

Famous Conspiracy Cases

Some notable conspiracy prosecutions include:

• Al Capone: The famous Chicago gangster was convicted of tax evasion, but also charged with conspiring to smuggle and distribute liquor during Prohibition.
• El Chapo: Mexican drug lord Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán was convicted of leading a criminal enterprise that smuggled huge amounts of drugs into the U.S.
• The Pizza Connection: A massive 1980s bust targeted an international heroin ring that used pizza parlors as fronts.

These cases used conspiracy laws to take down kingpins who insulated themselves from direct handling of drugs. El Chapo, for example, conspired with cartel underlings to distribute massive quantities internationally.

Federal vs. State Conspiracy Laws

Both federal and state laws punish drug conspiracies:

• Federal: Federal law (21 USC 846) makes it a crime to conspire to commit federal drug trafficking offenses. Penalties are the same as for the underlying trafficking crime.
• State: Most states also have conspiracy laws, punishing agreements to commit state drug crimes. Penalties vary but are typically felonies.

Federal charges are common in large interstate or international conspiracies. States prosecute local conspiracies. Defendants can face both federal and state charges for participating in the same conspiracy.

Sentencing Considerations for Drug Conspiracies

Sentences for drug conspiracy depend on:

• Drug type and quantity: Harsher penalties for hard drugs like cocaine and heroin or large quantities.
• Defendant’s role: Kingpins face longer sentences than low-level dealers.
• Criminal history: Repeat offenders get heavier sentences.
• Acceptance of responsibility: Pleading guilty early and cooperating may earn sentencing reductions.

While bit players often receive lighter sentences than bosses, penalties can still be severe even for small role. Much depends on prosecutors’ charging decisions and judges’ discretion. Mandatory minimums can kick in for certain quantities.

Takeaways on Drug Conspiracy Laws

Conspiracy laws give police and prosecutors potent tools to go after entire drug operations. But their broad reach also raises civil liberties concerns. Key takeaways include:

• They criminalize agreement rather than commission of drug crimes.
• All co-conspirators face charges regardless of role.
• Proving secret agreement can invite prosecutorial overreach.
• Defenses focus on no agreement, no knowledge or withdrawal.
• Both federal and state laws punish drug conspiracies with harsh penalties.

For anyone participating in the illegal drug trade, keeping conspiracy laws in mind is essential to understand the full legal risks. But for law enforcement, conspiracy charges remain indispensable tools for dismantling criminal organizations from top to bottom.

References

What is Criminal Conspiracy?

21 U.S. Code § 846 – Attempt and conspiracy

U.S. v. Joaquín Guzmán Lorea

The Pizza Connection Case