24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials

5

THE BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR.

The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation

Blog

Drafting a Winning Brief for Your Federal Criminal Appeal

March 21, 2024 Uncategorized

Drafting a Winning Brief for Your Federal Criminal Appeal

If you’ve been convicted of a federal crime and want to appeal, drafting a solid brief is crucial. This article will walk you through the key elements of a winning appeal brief in plain English, with examples and tips I’ve learned from my own experience as an appellate attorney.

Start with the Standard of Review

The standard of review section sets the bar for what you need to show in order to win. For example, if the issue is whether evidence was properly admitted, you’ll need to show the trial court abused its discretion. But if it’s about jury instructions, you just need to show they were misleading or inadequate. The standard is key because it frames the rest of your argument.

Organize Your Arguments Carefully

Structure matters! Outline your strongest issues first, weakest last. For each issue, explain why there was an error, show why it matters using cases, and connect the dots to prejudice. I like to think of it as a funnel – start broad then get narrower as you go. Headings and roadmaps help walk judges through your reasoning.

Example outline:

  1. Admission of prior bad acts was abuse of discretion
    1. Facts showing admission improper
    2. Cases on limits of prior bad act evidence
    3. How admission prejudiced client
  2. Jury instruction misstated the law

Be Selective With the Record

Don’t dump the whole record on the appeals court! Judges hate that. Quote only the most relevant excerpts to support your key points. I highlight transcripts in yellow and summarize other less critical parts. Remember, judges are reading hundreds of these – make their job easier.

Analogize and Distinguish Cases

Applying precedent is crucial. Explain how cases with good law support your position and distinguish the ones against you. Look for analogous cases in your circuit or from the Supreme Court. I like to make a chart comparing the facts and law of my case to key ones – it really illustrates the similarities and differences for the court.

Sample case chart:

Case Facts Law Compare/Distinguish
My Case Officer questioned defendant after Miranda Statements inadmissible
U.S. v. Patane Officer questioned after Miranda, found gun Physical evidence admissible Distinguish – this is on statements

Craft Carefully Tailored Arguments

A common mistake is making good arguments badly. The law may be on your side, but judges aren’t persuaded unless you tailor the arguments to the facts of your case. Apply the law to the specific errors that happened at trial. Don’t just recite law in the abstract – connect the dots for the court.

Layer in Policy Arguments

Beyond the law, think about the policy implications behind the issues. For example, if the case involves eyewitness identifications, discuss how they’re unreliable and innocent people get convicted. These types of arguments give broader context.

Write Tightly, Edit Mercilessly

Appeals judges have mountains of reading – make your brief shine by writing concisely. Start by streamlining arguments and removing repetition. Then go through line-by-line, deleting unnecessary words and phrases. If you can cut it, cut it. Active voice and short sentences help too. I aim for max 10-15 pages per issue.

Pay Attention to Technical Details

Follow all the court rules to the letter – formatting, deadlines, citations, etc. Seems small but mistakes here can tank your credibility. Use legal writing resources like the Bluebook for guidance. Careful proofreading is key to catch typos, grammar errors, and other glitches.

Conclusion

That covers the basics of drafting a winning federal criminal appeal brief! Remember to:

  • Set the right standard of review
  • Organize logically with headings
  • Quote record sparingly
  • Apply precedent carefully
  • Argue policy where relevant
  • Write tightly and edit sharply
  • Mind technical details

Follow these steps and you’ll have an excellent shot at success on appeal. Let me know if you have any other questions!

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile

RALPH P. FRANCHO, JR

Associate

view profile

JEREMY FEIGENBAUM

Associate Attorney

view profile

ELIZABETH GARVEY

Associate

view profile

CLAIRE BANKS

Associate

view profile

RAJESH BARUA

Of-Counsel

view profile

CHAD LEWIN

Of-Counsel

view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now