Blog
Defending Against Allegations of Philadelphia Offshore Bank Account Abuse
Contents
Defending Against Allegations of Philadelphia Offshore Bank Account Abuse
Offshore bank accounts can be a complex and confusing topic. Many people may not even realize they have reporting requirements for foreign accounts. However, failing to properly report offshore assets can lead to serious criminal charges like tax evasion or money laundering. If you’ve received a letter from the IRS or are being criminally investigated for offshore banking, it’s critical that you understand your rights and explore all legal defenses with an experienced attorney.
I’ve been defending clients against allegations of offshore bank account abuse for over 15 years here in Philadelphia. These cases require specialized legal knowledge across international tax law, banking secrecy, anti-money laundering (AML) regulations, and criminal defense. My firm can help clients navigate IRS audits, criminal prosecutions, and parallel civil/criminal offshore banking investigations. We start by fully analyzing your foreign assets and financial transactions to build the strongest possible defense.
Common Offshore Banking Charges in Philadelphia
There are a range of potential charges prosecutors can bring over unreported foreign bank accounts:
- Failure to file FBAR – The Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) must be filed if you have over $10,000 in offshore accounts. Civil penalties for non-willful violations can reach $12,921 per account. Criminal charges can include fines up to $250,000 and imprisonment up to 5 years.
- Tax evasion – Not reporting offshore income on your 1040 tax return is considered tax evasion. This felony can result in fines up to $100,000 and up to 5 years imprisonment. There may also be back taxes, interest, and civil fraud penalties owed on unreported income.
- Money laundering – Conducting transactions with illegally obtained money can lead to money laundering charges, even if the funds seem legitimate on their face. This includes concealing ownership, source, location, or control over illegal proceeds. Penalties include fines up to $500,000 and imprisonment up to 20 years.
The Philadelphia U.S. Attorney’s Office has secured several recent convictions for offshore tax evasion, including multi-year prison sentences. They also coordinate with the IRS, FBI, Homeland Security, and other agencies to build these complex investigations. Retaining an attorney at the earliest sign of a problem is critical.
Unique Defenses in Offshore Banking Cases
Every offshore banking case has its own unique set of facts. An experienced attorney will thoroughly analyze each detail to spot potential defenses to build your case around. Some examples I commonly rely on include:
Reliance on tax professionals – Hiring an accountant or tax preparer is not a complete defense by itself, but demonstrating good faith reliance on expert advice can substantially mitigate penalties. We gather evidence about exactly what you disclosed to tax professionals to show reasonableness.
Dual citizenship issues – Those with dual U.S. and foreign citizenship have additional reporting complexities. Failure to know about U.S. tax laws as a dual citizen living abroad may help demonstrate a reporting mistake rather than intentional evasion.
FBAR filing confusion – The FBAR form is separate from federal tax returns and relatively unknown to many with foreign assets. We highlight the obscure nature of FBAR rules to argue reasonable cause for failure to file.
Minimal or no tax loss – If unreported offshore income was from legal sources and non-U.S. activity, there may be no actual U.S. tax implications. Without a tax loss, we can sometimes convince prosecutors to drop tax evasion charges.
Parallel civil/criminal cases – Early cooperation on the civil side with the IRS can sometimes persuade prosecutors to drop criminal charges. But this strategy requires careful coordination as statements made can impact both cases.
Asset tracing challenges – Following the money back to an illegal source for money laundering charges presents huge logistical challenges. Intelligence agencies leverage tremendous resources to uncover illicit transactions. We scrutinize the evidence trail for potential break downs.
Statute of limitations – Unlike civil tax cases, offshore banking criminal cases must be charged within 5-6 years. Determining dates when foreign accounts were opened or closed can reveal prosecution outside these limits.
This overview just scratches the surface of potential offshore banking defenses. Each case has unique facts and opportunities we assess to give you the best chance at avoiding conviction or minimizing penalties. Don’t hesitate to contact me for a free, completely confidential legal consultation.
What to Expect in an Offshore Banking Investigation
Offshore account investigations unfold in several difficult stages:
Initial contact – The first sign of a problem is often a letter from the IRS or a subpoena from federal prosecutors. They request voluminous financial records and complex international transaction data that can overwhelm the average person.
Document production – You will need to gather statements, emails, wire transfers, account applications, and other records held by foreign banks and institutions. Language barriers, international legal process, and banking secrecy laws can present obstacles to compiling everything requested.
IRS interviews – IRS agents specialize in complex civil and criminal tax cases involving international activity and hidden assets. Early non-custodial interviews tend to focus on basic education and information gathering. Knowing constitutional rights is crucial.
Grand jury subpoena – If prosecutors take interest, you may be called to testify under oath before a grand jury investigating specific allegations of financial and tax crimes. This presents a critical stage where testimony will be used to build their case. The 5th Amendment protects against self-incrimination but asserting it early is vital.
Plea negotiations – If charges are filed, federal prosecutors may offer a plea deal to avoid trial. The merits of the evidence and potential penalties must be weighed carefully. Over 95% of federal cases end in plea agreements but sometimes trial is the better option despite downside risks.
Sentencing – Offshore cases often end in difficult sentencing hearings even after a plea deal. The judge considers complex factors under federal guidelines, gain/loss amounts, sophistication of conduct, and other circumstances. Fines and restitution are commonly imposed on top of incarceration.
Having an advocate by your side from the earliest contacts with federal authorities is essential. Don’t go through any stage of an offshore banking investigation alone. The lawyers at my firm have navigated many clients through this process as smoothly as possible. We offer empathetic guidance while aggressively defending your rights and freedom at every step. Reach out today for discreet help responding to that IRS letter or grand jury subpoena.
Why Every Offshore Banking Case Deserves an Individualized Defense Strategy
As a former Assistant U.S. Attorney myself earlier in my career, I understand exactly how prosecutors and federal agents build complex offshore banking cases. This insider perspective informs my judgment on the most advantageous defense strategies for clients. But every case has unique facts and opportunities that must be assessed independently.
Some attorneys take shortcuts, pushing standard defense tactics or generic claims about confusing regulations and good faith intentions. At my firm, we dig into the specific circumstances behind your foreign assets and financial activity history to craft an individualized strategic response. This takes more upfront effort but pays dividends later when challenging the legal merits of charges or arguing sentencing positions.
I personally handle every offshore banking case to bring this experience to bear. My defense philosophy emphasizes customized strategies built on the distinct facts of each investigation. I welcome any prosecutor or IRS agent to a debate on the merits because I know my meticulous preparation and focused defensive theory gives clients the best chance at the best possible outcome.
If you or a loved one are facing civil or criminal allegations over an offshore bank account, I encourage you to look beyond a law firm’s marketing materials or claims about offshore banking experience. Interview multiple attorneys and ask detailed questions about the defenses they commonly rely on and why those apply to your unique situation. Please reach out to me as well – even if only for a free initial consultation or second opinion on your case. My direct experience both prosecuting and defending these cases can provide invaluable perspective.