24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196




When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials



The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation


Decoding North Dakota’s Sentencing Guidelines for Public Corruption Offenses

March 29, 2024

Decoding North Dakota’s Sentencing Guidelines for Public Corruption Offenses

Corruption in public office is a serious crime that undermines the very fabric of our democracy. When elected officials abuse their power for personal gain, it erodes public trust and faith in government institutions. In North Dakota, public corruption offenses are taken very seriously and carry stiff penalties under the state‘s sentencing guidelines.

Understanding Public Corruption Crimes in North Dakota

Public corruption crimes in North Dakota encompass a wide range of offenses committed by public officials, including bribery, embezzlement, fraud, and misuse of public funds. According to the North Dakota Century Code, public servants who knowingly misuse public funds or property for private gain can face Class C felony charges, which carry a maximum sentence of five years in prison and a $10,000 fine.Bribery of public officials is also a serious offense under North Dakota law. The statute defines bribery as offering, giving, or agreeing to give anything of value to a public official with the intent to influence their official actions. Bribery is a Class C felony, punishable by up to five years in prison.Embezzlement by a public official is another form of public corruption that carries harsh penalties in North Dakota. Under section 12.1-23-07 of the Century Code, any public servant who misappropriates public funds or property for their own use can be charged with a Class B felony, which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison.

Factors That Influence Sentencing for Public Corruption Offenses

When it comes to sentencing for public corruption offenses in North Dakota, judges consider a variety of factors to determine an appropriate punishment. Some of the key factors that can influence sentencing include:

  • The severity of the offense and amount of public funds involved
  • The defendant’s criminal history and prior convictions
  • Whether the defendant abused a position of public trust
  • The impact of the crime on public confidence in government
  • Any mitigating factors, such as cooperation with authorities or restitution

In general, public officials who commit corruption offenses can expect to face harsher penalties than ordinary citizens due to the breach of public trust involved. Judges may also consider the need to send a strong deterrent message to other public officials who may be tempted to engage in corrupt practices.

Notable Public Corruption Cases in North Dakota

While North Dakota has a reputation for clean and honest government, the state has seen its share of high-profile public corruption cases over the years. Here are a few notable examples:

  • In 2019, a former North Dakota state senator was sentenced to 30 months in federal prison for accepting bribes and lying to the FBI. The senator admitted to taking $10,000 in cash and Las Vegas casino chips from a cooperating witness in exchange for official acts.
  • In 2015, a former North Dakota tax commissioner was convicted of misusing his office for personal gain. The commissioner was accused of improperly accessing confidential tax records and sharing them with a friend who was involved in a business dispute. He was sentenced to two years of probation and ordered to pay a $2,000 fine.
  • In 2012, a former North Dakota university system chancellor was charged with misusing public funds to pay for a family trip to Arizona. The chancellor pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor offense and was ordered to pay $5,000 in restitution to the state.

These cases underscore the importance of holding public officials accountable for corruption and abuse of power. They also demonstrate that no one is above the law, regardless of their position or influence.

The Role of Federal Law in Prosecuting Public Corruption

In addition to state laws, federal statutes also play a key role in prosecuting public corruption offenses in North Dakota. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of North Dakota has made fighting public corruption a top priority, and works closely with state and local authorities to investigate and prosecute these crimes.Federal laws that may be used to prosecute public corruption in North Dakota include:

  • The Hobbs Act, which prohibits extortion or bribery affecting interstate commerce
  • The mail and wire fraud statutes, which prohibit schemes to defraud using the mail or electronic communications
  • The Travel Act, which prohibits interstate travel in aid of racketeering enterprises
  • The RICO Act, which allows prosecutors to target corrupt organizations and seize their assets

Federal prosecutors have a wide range of tools at their disposal to investigate and prosecute public corruption, including wiretaps, undercover operations, and immunity agreements for cooperating witnesses. They also have the ability to seek stiff penalties, including lengthy prison sentences and hefty fines.

Defenses to Public Corruption Charges

While public corruption charges are serious, defendants do have legal defenses available to them depending on the circumstances of the case. Some common defenses to public corruption charges include:

  • Lack of intent: To be convicted of a corruption offense, prosecutors must prove that the defendant acted with corrupt intent. If the defendant can show that they did not intend to engage in corrupt conduct, it may be a viable defense.
  • Entrapment: If the defendant was induced or coerced into committing a corrupt act by law enforcement, they may be able to raise an entrapment defense. However, this defense is often difficult to prove and requires showing that the defendant was not predisposed to commit the offense.
  • Insufficient evidence: As with any criminal case, prosecutors must prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If there are gaps or inconsistencies in the evidence, or if key witnesses are not credible, it may be grounds for acquittal.
  • Statute of limitations: There are time limits for bringing criminal charges, known as the statute of limitations. If the alleged offense occurred outside the applicable time period, the charges may be dismissed.

Of course, the best defense to public corruption charges is to avoid engaging in corrupt conduct in the first place. Public officials have a sacred trust to act in the best interests of their constituents and uphold the rule of law. Violating that trust can have serious consequences, both legally and professionally.

The Importance of Transparency and Accountability

At the end of the day, combating public corruption requires a commitment to transparency and accountability at all levels of government. Citizens have a right to know how their tax dollars are being spent and to hold their elected officials accountable for their actions.Some steps that can help promote transparency and prevent corruption include:

  • Strengthening ethics laws and financial disclosure requirements for public officials
  • Establishing independent oversight bodies to investigate allegations of misconduct
  • Protecting whistleblowers who report wrongdoing in government
  • Encouraging public participation and engagement in the political process
  • Ensuring a free and independent press to hold officials accountable

By working together to promote integrity and root out corruption, we can build a stronger and more resilient democracy for all. As the saying goes, “sunlight is the best disinfectant.” By shining a light on corrupt practices and holding wrongdoers accountable, we can restore public trust and faith in our government institutions.

The Bottom Line

Public corruption is a serious crime that undermines the very foundations of our democracy. In North Dakota, public officials who abuse their power for personal gain face stiff penalties under the state’s sentencing guidelines, including lengthy prison sentences and hefty fines.But combating corruption requires more than just tough laws and aggressive prosecution. It requires a culture of integrity, transparency, and accountability at all levels of government. It requires engaged citizens who are willing to speak out against wrongdoing and demand better from their elected officials.As one Reddit user put it, “We need to hold our politicians accountable and demand transparency in government. Corruption has no place in North Dakota or anywhere else.”By working together to promote good governance and root out corruption, we can build a stronger, more just, and more equitable society for all. It won’t be easy, but it’s a fight worth fighting – for the sake of our democracy and for generations to come.

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile



view profile


Associate Attorney

view profile



view profile



view profile



view profile



view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now