Service & Results.

nyc criminal lawyers over 30 years of experienceWe Know How To Win Cases

Spodek Law Group handles tough cases
nationwide, that demand excellence.

Get Free Consultation

Faced 5+ Years in Prison

People Vs Joseph Amico

Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.

Faced 10+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Anna Sorokin

Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.

Faced 3+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Genevieve Sabourin

Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.

Faced Potential Charges

Ghislaine Maxwell Juror

Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.

Why Choose Us

Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.

Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.

We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.

Law in the Media

View All

Meet Todd Spodek


The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.

Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.

In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.

Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group

The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.

We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.

If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.

Can Responding to an FTC Civil Investigative Demand Support Reputational Goals?

By Spodek Law Group | January 24, 2024
(Last Updated On: January 24, 2024)

Can Responding to an FTC Civil Investigative Demand Support Reputational Goals?

Receiving a civil investigative demand (CID) from the Federal Trade Commission can be concerning for any business. The FTC issues these demands when it believes a company may have violated consumer protection laws or engaged in anticompetitive practices.

While concerning, responding appropriately to an FTC investigation and CID can actually benefit a company’s reputation. Handling the demands professionally demonstrates a commitment to ethics and compliance. Additionally, if no violations are ultimately found, a company can point to its cooperation as evidence of its lawful practices.

Understanding FTC Investigative Authority

The FTC has broad authority to investigate potential violations of laws like the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Clayton Antitrust Act. This includes the power to issue CIDs compelling companies to provide documents, written answers, or oral testimony related to a probe [1].

CIDs are enforceable demands that must be taken seriously. If a company fails to properly respond, the FTC can go to court to force compliance and seek penalties for contempt [2].

Responding Thoughtfully and Transparently

Receiving a CID does not necessarily mean a company has broken the law. But it does require carefully considering how to respond [3].

Companies should promptly implement a legal hold to preserve relevant documents. They should also assemble an experienced team including outside counsel, forensic experts if necessary, and public relations support [4].

This team can help thoroughly review the CID and negotiate with FTC staff to clarify or narrow requests if appropriate. They can also determine if any grounds exist to file a petition to limit or quash the CID [5].

If negotiations fail, responding transparently and meeting obligations demonstrates good faith. Submitting materials on time accompanied by context about policies and practices can favorably influence FTC staff [6].

Avoiding Common Mistakes

Mishandling an investigation can needlessly raise reputational or legal risks. Companies should avoid:

  • Ignoring a CID, which practically guarantees contempt charges
  • Oversharing information without review for privilege or other protections
  • Waiting until the last minute to raise issues with deadlines or scope
  • Making assertions to FTC staff without experienced counsel

Taking these steps without a plan often backfires. Following experienced counsel’s advice on precisely responding to obligations can pay dividends [7].

Reaping Reputational Rewards

Handled appropriately, responding to an FTC investigation can benefit reputation in multiple ways:

  1. Demonstrating effective compliance: Meeting demands responsibly signals a company prioritizes ethics and compliance. This builds trust with customers and partners [8].
  2. Preventing formal action: Responsible handling gives the FTC less reason to pursue charges or a lawsuit. If the FTC closes the investigation, it validates the company’s practices [9].
  3. Reinforcing lawful conduct: Should no violations ultimately emerge, cooperating with the investigation evidence a company’s commitment to legal and ethical business practices.

A CID signals increased scrutiny but responding transparently can yield reputational benefits. Companies seen as cooperating appropriately may gain public trust and validation if the FTC takes no action.

Of course, careful handling cannot guarantee a particular outcome. But working responsibly through an FTC investigation offers companies the best chance to demonstrate upstanding practices.

Key Considerations

Key takeaways for companies receiving an FTC civil investigative demand include:

  • Promptly implement a legal hold on relevant materials
  • Assemble an experienced team to guide response strategy
  • Negotiate with FTC staff to narrow or clarify CID if appropriate
  • Avoid ignoring CID or oversharing information
  • Meet obligations transparently and on schedule
  • Position practices favorably while avoiding unvetted admissions

Responsiveness, transparency, and positioning should guide response strategy. This approach gives companies under investigation the best opportunity to demonstrate upstanding practices, potentially validating their operations if no violations are found.

Free Consultation


I was searching for a law firm with some power to help me deal with a warrant in New York . After 6 days I decided to go with Spodek Law Group. It helped that This law firm is well respected by not only the top law firms in New York , but the DA , Judge as well. I...

~Fonder Brandon

5 Stars
It was my good fortune to retain Spodek Law Group for representation for my legal needs. From the beginning, communication was prompt and thorough. Todd, Kenneth and Alex were the first people I worked with and they all made me feel comfortable and confident that the team was going to work hard for me. Everything was explained and any concerns...

~A G

5 Stars
After meeting with several law firms, I chose the Spodek Law Group not only for their professionalism and experience, but for the personal attention given to me right from the initial consultation. It is important to recognize how crucial having the right legal team is when faced with potentially life altering events that impact families and the lives of loved...

~George Cherubini

Spodek Law Group

White Glove Service

We Provide Superior Service, Excellent Results, At A Level Superior To Other Criminal Defense Law Firms. Regardless Of Where Your Case Is, Nationwide, We Can Help You.
View More

Request Free Consultation

Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.


85 Broad St 30th Floor, New York, NY 10004


get directions

Los Angeles

611 S Catalina St Suite 222, Los Angeles, CA 90005


get directions


35-37 36th St, 2nd Floor Astoria, NY 11106


get directions


195 Montague St., 14th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201


get directions
Call Now!