Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Receiving a civil investigative demand (CID) from the Federal Trade Commission can be concerning for any business. The FTC issues these demands when it believes a company may have violated consumer protection laws or engaged in anticompetitive practices.
While concerning, responding appropriately to an FTC investigation and CID can actually benefit a company’s reputation. Handling the demands professionally demonstrates a commitment to ethics and compliance. Additionally, if no violations are ultimately found, a company can point to its cooperation as evidence of its lawful practices.
The FTC has broad authority to investigate potential violations of laws like the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Clayton Antitrust Act. This includes the power to issue CIDs compelling companies to provide documents, written answers, or oral testimony related to a probe .
CIDs are enforceable demands that must be taken seriously. If a company fails to properly respond, the FTC can go to court to force compliance and seek penalties for contempt .
Receiving a CID does not necessarily mean a company has broken the law. But it does require carefully considering how to respond .
Companies should promptly implement a legal hold to preserve relevant documents. They should also assemble an experienced team including outside counsel, forensic experts if necessary, and public relations support .
This team can help thoroughly review the CID and negotiate with FTC staff to clarify or narrow requests if appropriate. They can also determine if any grounds exist to file a petition to limit or quash the CID .
If negotiations fail, responding transparently and meeting obligations demonstrates good faith. Submitting materials on time accompanied by context about policies and practices can favorably influence FTC staff .
Mishandling an investigation can needlessly raise reputational or legal risks. Companies should avoid:
Taking these steps without a plan often backfires. Following experienced counsel’s advice on precisely responding to obligations can pay dividends .
Handled appropriately, responding to an FTC investigation can benefit reputation in multiple ways:
A CID signals increased scrutiny but responding transparently can yield reputational benefits. Companies seen as cooperating appropriately may gain public trust and validation if the FTC takes no action.
Of course, careful handling cannot guarantee a particular outcome. But working responsibly through an FTC investigation offers companies the best chance to demonstrate upstanding practices.
Key takeaways for companies receiving an FTC civil investigative demand include:
Responsiveness, transparency, and positioning should guide response strategy. This approach gives companies under investigation the best opportunity to demonstrate upstanding practices, potentially validating their operations if no violations are found.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.