24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials

5

THE BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR.

The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation

Blog

Penal Code 654 PC | Multiple Punishments for the Same Act

Penal Code 654 PC | Multiple Punishments for the Same Act

Penal Code 654 PC is a California law that prohibits multiple punishments for the same criminal act or omission. This law comes into play when a defendant commits an act or series of acts that violate multiple criminal laws. The purpose of PC 654 is to prevent prosecutors from “piling on” multiple punishments for the same criminal conduct.

For example, say someone breaks into a house and steals items inside. This could potentially violate California burglary laws, theft laws, and vandalism laws if property was damaged. But under PC 654, the person can only be punished for one of those offenses. The separate offenses merge into one crime for purposes of sentencing.

But PC 654 gets complicated when there are multiple victims or the defendant has separate criminal objectives. This article will explain the law on multiple punishments in California, when PC 654 applies, and potential defenses.

The Law on Multiple Punishments in California

Penal Code 654 PC states:

An act or omission that is punishable in different ways by different provisions of law shall be punished under the provision that provides for the longest potential term of imprisonment, but in no case shall the act or omission be punished under more than one provision.

In plain English, this means a defendant cannot be punished multiple times for the same criminal act or omission. Even if the act violates several laws, the defendant can only be punished once.

For example:

  • Joe breaks into Mary’s house and steals her jewelry. He can be punished for the burglary or the theft but not both.
  • Linda attacks John, breaking his nose and bruising his ribs. She can be punished for assault but not for both the broken nose and bruised ribs.

The one punishment imposed will typically be for the offense with the longest prison sentence. Prosecutors can’t get around 654 PC by charging multiple lower-level offenses.

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
2024-03-21
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
2024-03-18
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
2024-03-18
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
2024-03-15
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
2024-03-15
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
2024-03-12
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
2024-03-12
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
2024-02-28
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
2024-02-24
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

When Does Penal Code 654 Apply?

California courts apply PC 654 in two main situations:

  1. Single Act: The defendant commits an act violating more than one criminal statute.
  2. Single Course of Conduct: The defendant engages in a course of conduct (a series of acts) that violates more than one criminal statute.

Some examples where PC 654 prohibits multiple punishments:

  • Joe punches Mary in the face, breaking her nose. He committed one act (the punch) that violated both assault and battery laws.
  • Linda embezzles money from her employer over a 6-month period. Her series of acts constitutes one course of conduct amounting to grand theft.

The defendant’s intent and objective are key factors when deciding if multiple offenses are part of an “indivisible course of conduct” under PC 654.1 If the offenses were committed with a “single intent and objective,” then the defendant can likely only be punished once even if multiple crimes occurred.

Exceptions – When Multiple Punishments Are Allowed

There are certain exceptions when Penal Code 654 does NOT bar multiple punishments for the same act or course of conduct:

  1. Separate Victims: Multiple punishments are permitted if the act or course of conduct harmed multiple victims.2 For example, a defendant who sprays gunfire into a crowd can be separately punished for each person injured.
  2. Separate Acts: The defendant can be separately punished for multiple criminal acts, even if they are part of an otherwise “indivisible course of conduct.” For example, a defendant who breaks into a house, steals items, and then sets the house on fire can be punished for the burglary, theft, and arson.3
  3. Separate Intent and Objective: If the defendant harbored multiple criminal objectives that were independent of each other, then he/she can be punished for each crime committed in pursuit of each objective.4

Prosecutors frequently argue that one of the above exceptions applies whenever a defendant raises a PC 654 defense. The application of 654 PC to a given case often involves very fact-specific inquiries. Defendants should consult with an experienced California criminal defense attorney to determine if 654 applies to their case.

Penal Code 654 Defenses

There are various arguments and defenses that criminal defendants can raise under Penal Code 654 to avoid multiple punishments. Some of these include:

  • The multiple offenses were committed through a single act or indivisible course of conduct with a single intent and objective.
  • The prosecutor improperly “stacked” multiple charges for one criminal act or series of acts.
  • The alleged “multiple” victims were not truly separate victims (for example, if the victims were relatives or connected to each other).
  • The defendant did not entertain multiple criminal objectives when committing the alleged acts.
  • The alleged “separate” acts were too closely connected in time and location to be considered truly separate.

A skilled California criminal defense lawyer can evaluate the facts of the case and applicable law to identify the best PC 654 defenses. The attorney can then argue to the court that multiple punishments are prohibited and certain charges should be dismissed.

Penal Code 654 and Sentencing

If the court determines that PC 654 prohibits multiple punishments, the judge will impose sentence on just one of the offenses. Typically this will be the offense with the longest potential prison term.5

For instance, say a defendant is convicted of:

  • Grand theft (3 years in jail)
  • Petty theft (6 months in jail)

Here the court would impose punishment for the grand theft only, since it carries the longest sentence. The petty theft conviction would be stayed or effectively set aside.

However, if part of the sentence for one offense could be served separately, the court may impose that portion of the sentence. For example, the court could stay the jail term for petty theft but still impose a fine.6

In addition, just because the court stays punishment on one offense at initial sentencing does not mean the stay is permanent. If the conviction on the other offense gets reversed on appeal, the stay on the first offense can be lifted so the defendant still serves some punishment.7

How We Can Help

Penal Code 654 PC is a complex statute that requires an in-depth understanding of California sentencing laws. An experienced California criminal defense attorney can advise whether PC 654 prohibits multiple punishments in your case. If so, the attorney can file motions asking the court to dismiss or stay certain charges.

At the California Defense Lawyers firm, we have successfully argued PC 654 defenses on behalf of clients facing multiple charges for the same conduct. We can carefully review the facts of your case and fight to ensure you do not receive unfair multiple punishments.

To discuss your case in a free and confidential consultation, call us or complete the form on this page.

Legal References:

  1. People v. Harrison (1989) 48 Cal.3d 321, 335.
  2. People v. Correa (2012) 54 Cal.4th 331, 336.
  3. People v. Felix (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 905, 915.
  4. People v. Liu (1996) 46 Cal.App.4th 1119, 1135.
  5. People v. Siko (1988) 45 Cal.3d 820, 826.
  6. People v. Alford (2010) 180 Cal.App.4th 1463, 1468.
  7. People v. Alford, see footnote 6 above.

 

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile

RALPH P. FRANCHO, JR

Associate

view profile

JEREMY FEIGENBAUM

Associate Attorney

view profile

ELIZABETH GARVEY

Associate

view profile

CLAIRE BANKS

Associate

view profile

RAJESH BARUA

Of-Counsel

view profile

CHAD LEWIN

Of-Counsel

view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now