Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
In Queens, New York, drug lawyers regularly face cases involving unconstitutional vehicle searches by police. These improper searches can lead to drug charges, weapons charges, and more. As experienced criminal defense attorneys know, the Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. However, exceptions to the Fourth Amendment allow warrantless vehicle searches in certain circumstances.
Queens drug lawyers challenge these unconstitutional searches by filing motions to suppress evidence. If granted, this leads to dismissal of charges. Defense attorneys argue the search violated rights guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment and Article I Section 12 of New York’s constitution.
Police may conduct warrantless vehicle searches only if one of these recognized exceptions applies:
If none of these exceptions apply, any evidence found during the unlawful search may be suppressed.
Queens drug lawyers have succeeded in getting evidence thrown out in many improper vehicle search cases. For example:
Skilled Queens drug lawyers use motions to suppress to challenge unconstitutional vehicle searches and exclude illegally obtained evidence.
Defense attorneys must identify a cognizable Fourth Amendment violation. Common arguments include lack of probable cause, invalid warrant, improper impoundment, failure to follow inventory procedures, etc.
The motion to suppress must establish precisely how the search violated constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. Detailed fact-finding lays the groundwork for suppression.
The defense bears the initial burden of alleging unconstitutional police conduct. But once a cognizable Fourth Amendment violation is shown, the burden shifts to the prosecution.
Now the state must prove by a preponderance of evidence that the search complied with the Fourth Amendment. This burden-shifting framework gives the defense an edge.
Defense lawyers can file a motion to suppress before trial begins or during the trial itself. But it’s best to file early on to allow proper investigation and prevent trial delays.
Gathering reliable information quickly is crucial. Police reports may omit critical facts or provide misleading accounts of events. Independent investigation helps uncover police misconduct.
In a suppression hearing, both sides present evidence about the legality of the search. This can include police testimony, recordings, documents, forensic evidence, etc.
Credibility often plays a key role. Defense lawyers may argue that officers lied about smelling marijuana or other suspicious circumstances used to justify a warrantless search.
Without the excluded evidence, the prosecution’s case may completely fall apart. Charges could get dismissed or reduced. Even if charges proceed to trial, losing key evidence weakens the state’s case.
New York’s 2021 marijuana legalization law declares that the odor of cannabis alone no longer establishes probable cause for a vehicle search. Several other states have similar laws.
So officers can no longer rely on claiming they smelled marijuana to justify a warrantless search. This will significantly impact vehicle stops going forward.
Police need to develop actual probable cause based on objective facts about illegal activity. They can’t use minor traffic violations as an excuse to go fishing for contraband.
Thanks to marijuana reforms, Queens drug lawyers have an additional argument to challenge flimsy police rationales for vehicle searches.
The accounts in police reports may omit or misrepresent critical facts about a vehicle search. This is why independent investigation by defense lawyers is so important.
Officers don’t always disclose improper motivations. For example, statistics show police disproportionately stop drivers of color in pretextual traffic stops seeking to uncover contraband. Highly intrusive searches often follow.
Likewise, minor marijuana possession arrests continue despite legalization. And “consent searches” rely on coercion, ignorance of rights, or outright deception.
Through witness interviews, video footage requests, and other evidence gathering, Queens drug lawyers can build arguments to suppress illegally obtained evidence. But this takes time and resources.
Public defenders carrying hundreds of cases lack capacity to dig deeper in most arrests. So innocent people plead guilty every day without ever challenging unconstitutional searches. Quality representation makes all the difference.
Motions to suppress enable Queens drug lawyers to hold police accountable for illegal searches. Excluding improperly obtained evidence keeps the criminal legal system in check.
This upholds Fourth Amendment principles against unreasonable government overreach. Rights violations that go unchallenged lead down a slippery slope.
Granting motions to suppress also changes police training and protocols. As certain questionable rationales for warrantless searches stop working in court, officers adapt. Deterrence sets in.
But defending constitutional freedoms is an uphill battle. Overcoming systemic racism and unchecked police power takes relentless effort. Having experienced Queens drug lawyers in your corner levels the playing field. Don’t hesitate to exercise your rights. The law is on your side.
For more information on challenging unconstitutional vehicle searches in New York, check out these additional resources:
Reach out to a qualified Queens criminal defense lawyer for help if you believe police violated your rights. Protecting freedom starts one case at a time.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.