Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Mandatory minimum sentencing laws require that individuals convicted of certain crimes receive a minimum sentence. These laws restrict judges’ discretion in setting appropriate sentences based on the facts of each case. Understanding how these laws work is important for anyone facing criminal charges in New York.
Mandatory minimums set a baseline sentence that must be imposed when someone is convicted of particular offenses. For example, New York has mandatory minimums ranging from 1-15 years for violent felonies like armed robbery or assault. Judges cannot go below this floor even if they think a lower sentence would be more appropriate. The judge can give a longer sentence, but not below the minimum.
New York’s mandatory minimums target particular serious and violent crimes. These include:
They do not apply to every crime. But for those charges that do carry a mandatory minimum, the judge cannot ignore the required sentence if there is a conviction.
By setting a sentencing floor, mandatory minimums transfer power away from judges to impose appropriate sentences. Without these laws judges could give lower sentences by considering factors like:
But with mandatory minimums the judge cannot consider these mitigating factors. The judge’s hands are tied even when the mandatory minimum penalty seems excessive.
Facing long mandatory minimum sentences puts intense pressure on defendants to plead guilty. Even if they have a valid defense, defendants may plead to lesser charges to avoid mandatory minimums. Over 90% of criminal cases end in plea deals. Mandatory minimums are a key reason why. Defendants plead guilty to avoid charges carrying long mandatory sentences, even if they could prove their innocence at trial.
There is growing recognition that mandatory minimums lead to excessive sentences without improving public safety. Some key leaders in New York are pushing to reform these laws, including:
There is particular focus on reforming mandatory minimums for non-violent drug offenses. Several other states have already repealed mandatory minimums with positive results. Similar reforms may be coming soon to New York as well.
New York’s mandatory minimum sentencing laws require judges to impose harsh sentences for certain offenses, with violent felonies carrying terms from 1-25 years. These laws apply to specific charges like robbery, assault, and drug distribution. Mandatory minimums transfer sentencing power from judges to legislators by setting a sentencing floor. They also pressure defendants to plead guilty to avoid facing excessive mandatory penalties. There is growing momentum for reforming mandatory minimums in New York. But for now these laws remain in effect and have a profound impact on sentences for certain charges. Understanding how mandatory work is critical for anyone facing charges in New York’s criminal justice system.
How New York’s Rockefeller Drug Laws Set the Stage for Mass Incarceration – Reddit discussion
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.