Blog
Arguing Prosecutorial Misconduct on Federal Appeal
Arguing Prosecutorial Misconduct on Federal Appeal
Prosecutorial misconduct refers to improper, illegal, or unethical behavior by a prosecutor during a criminal trial. This can include suppressing evidence, improper examination of witnesses, improper closing arguments, and other actions that violate a defendant’s constitutional rights. If you believe prosecutorial misconduct occurred during your federal criminal trial, you may be able to raise this issue on direct appeal to challenge your conviction or sentence. However, appellate courts give a lot of deference to trial prosecutors and it can be difficult to succeed with a prosecutorial misconduct claim. Here’s an overview of how to identify and argue prosecutorial misconduct issues in a federal criminal appeal.
Identifying Prosecutorial Misconduct
The first step is to closely review the record from your trial and identify any statements or actions by the prosecutor that seemed improper. Some common examples of prosecutorial misconduct include:
- Withholding exculpatory evidence that is favorable to the defense
- Knowingly allowing perjured testimony from a prosecution witness
- Making improper comments during opening statement or closing argument
- Asking improper questions or making improper comments when examining witnesses
- Making inflammatory arguments designed to appeal to jurors’ emotions rather than facts
- Misstating the law or the burden of proof
- Vouching for credibility of prosecution witnesses
- Making derogatory comments about the defendant
If you identify any concerning statements or actions in the record, the next step is to research the applicable law to see if the prosecutor’s conduct violated any recognized constitutional rights or federal procedural rules. Some key sources to consult include:
- The Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Federal Rules of Evidence
- Relevant federal statutes
- U.S. Supreme Court and federal appellate opinions on prosecutorial misconduct issues
By comparing the prosecutor’s conduct to governing law, you can determine if there are solid grounds to allege prosecutorial misconduct on appeal. Also review any objections made by defense counsel during trial, as raising a timely objection is usually required to preserve the issue for appeal.
Making the Prosecutorial Misconduct Argument
In your appeal briefs, you will need to lay out a compelling argument explaining how the prosecutor’s actions violated your constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial. Here are some tips for crafting an effective prosecutorial misconduct argument:
- Clearly identify each instance of alleged misconduct and explain why it was improper under the law
- Cite relevant constitutional amendments, court rules, statutes, and case law to frame your legal argument
- Emphasize how the misconduct prejudiced you or negatively impacted your substantial rights
- Explain why any curative instructions from the judge were insufficient to remedy the misconduct
- Rebut any counterarguments the prosecution may raise to defend the prosecutor’s actions
- Argue that the conviction should be reversed because of the prosecutorial misconduct
When outlining your argument, focus on the prosecutor’s actions, not their motivations. Courts assume prosecutors act in good faith, so claims of intentional or malicious misconduct can backfire. Stick to arguing how the conduct objectively violated your rights.
Overcoming the Harmless Error Doctrine
One major hurdle in prosecutorial misconduct appeals is the harmless error doctrine. This provides that even errors of constitutional dimension do not require reversal if they were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. To overcome harmless error analysis, you must convince the appellate court that the prosecutor’s misconduct likely impacted the outcome of your case. For example, argue that improper witness vouching bolstered a weak prosecution witness whose testimony was essential for conviction. The stronger you can show the prejudicial effect of the misconduct, the better chance you have of reversal.
Using Case Law to Support Your Argument
Citing persuasive federal appellate opinions that found reversible prosecutorial misconduct in analogous circumstances can help demonstrate why the prosecutor’s actions in your case warrant a new trial. Some notable U.S. Supreme Court decisions include:
- Brady v. Maryland – Withholding exculpatory evidence violates due process
- Kyles v. Whitley – Prosecutors have duty to learn of and disclose exculpatory evidence known to police
- Berger v. United States – Prosecutors cannot misstate facts or improperly appeal to juror emotions
Lower federal appeals courts have also issued many opinions finding prosecutorial misconduct and reversing convictions when appropriate. Citing factually similar cases from your federal circuit can demonstrate the proper legal standards and show why reversal is warranted under binding precedent.
Requesting an Evidentiary Hearing
If the existing trial record is insufficient to fully prove your prosecutorial misconduct claims, consider requesting an evidentiary hearing on appeal. This allows you to present additional evidence about the prosecutor’s improper actions. For example, you may seek to offer new witness testimony or documents showing the prosecution suppressed exculpatory evidence. Make sure to specify in your briefs what additional evidence you would present and why a hearing is needed to develop your arguments.
Remedies for Prosecutorial Misconduct
There are several potential remedies available if an appellate court agrees prosecutorial misconduct occurred:
- New trial – Most common remedy; misconduct was prejudicial so conviction is reversed and case remanded for new trial
- Judgment of acquittal – Rare; court finds misconduct was so egregious that only permissible remedy is acquittal
- Sentencing rehearing – Granted if misconduct only impacted sentencing phase
The remedy depends on the nature and timing of the misconduct. The key is convincing the appellate court that the prosecutor’s actions were so improper that they rendered the trial or sentence unfair.
Avoiding Procedural Pitfalls
There are also some procedural requirements you must comply with to avoid having otherwise valid prosecutorial misconduct claims denied on technical grounds:
- File a timely notice of appeal within 14 days of judgment being entered
- Order complete trial transcripts to support your arguments
- Cite to specific pages in the record when describing the misconduct
- Make sure defense counsel objected during trial to preserve the issue
- Raise the claim in your opening appellate brief, not later filings
With careful trial review, compelling legal arguments, and attention to procedural details, you may be able to convince the appellate court that prosecutorial misconduct during your case entitles you to relief from your conviction or sentence. But keep in mind appellate courts are very deferential to prosecutors, so prosecutorial misconduct claims are often an uphill battle. Retaining an experienced federal criminal appeals lawyer can help maximize your chances of success. Don’t hesitate to reach out to a legal aid organization if you cannot afford counsel for your appeal.