24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials

5

THE BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR.

The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation

Blog

18 U.S.C. § 2421 – Transportation of individuals for illegal sexual activity

March 21, 2024 Uncategorized

What is 18 U.S.C. § 2421 and Why Should I Care?

Hey there! Have you heard about 18 U.S.C. § 2421? It’s a law that makes it illegal to transport someone across state or national borders for the purpose of having illegal sex. I know, that sounds kind of intense and scary. But don’t worry – I’m here to break it all down for you in simple terms so you can understand what it means.

First off, let’s talk about what this law actually says. The official legal mumbo-jumbo is that 18 U.S.C. §: It’s illegal to drive or fly someone from one state or country to another if you’re planning to have them take part in prostitution or any other kind of illegal sexual activity once you get there. Prostitution means paying someone for sex. Illegal sexual activity could be stuff like underage sex, forced sex, etc. – anything that could get someone arrested.

So for example, if Bob drove Jane from California to Nevada with the plan to have Jane work as a prostitute once they got to Vegas, Bob could be charged under 18 U.S.C. § 2421. Or if Sara flew Luis from Mexico to Texas intending to force him into having sex, Sara could also be charged under this law.

Why Was This Law Created?

The main reason 18 U.S.C. § 2421 exists is to give federal authorities a way to crack down on human trafficking operations. Traffickers often transport victims across state or national borders as part of their criminal schemes. So this law helps take away one of the tools traffickers use to commit their crimes.

The law can also be used to prosecute people who transport consenting adults across borders for illegal sexual purposes. The government has an interest in preventing the spread of illegal sex work like prostitution, even when it involves adults who seem to be willingly participating.

There’s a lot of debate around whether this law goes too far in some cases. Like, should it really be a federal crime if two adults decide to travel somewhere to engage in prostitution? We’ll get into those pros and cons a bit later.

What Are the Penalties?

If you’re convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2421, you can face some pretty tough penalties:

  • Up to 10 years in federal prison
  • Fines of up to $250,000
  • Having to register as a sex offender

Judges have a lot of discretion in sentencing though. The punishment really depends on the specific facts of each case. For example, trafficking a child across borders for sex would likely result in a harsher sentence than transporting a consenting adult prostitute.

What Are Some Examples of Prosecutions Under This Law?

There have been a number of high-profile cases where 18 U.S.C. § 2421 has been used to convict human traffickers:

  • In 2011, a man from Mexico was sentenced to 15 years in prison for trafficking young women into the U.S. and forcing them to work as prostitutes in New York and New Jersey.
  • In 2019, the CEO of a modeling agency was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 2421 for luring aspiring models from Brazil and forcing them into prostitution. He was sentenced to 6 years in prison.
  • In 2020, a man from Minnesota got 10 years in prison for driving two teenagers across state lines and pimping them out for sex.

The law has also been used in cases involving consenting adults. For example, in 2015 a man from Iowa was convicted after driving three adult prostitutes from Iowa to Nebraska to engage in prostitution. He got 2 years in federal prison.

What Are Some Criticisms of This Law?

There’s a lot of debate around whether 18 U.S.C. § 2421 goes too far in criminalizing consensual adult prostitution that happens to cross state lines. Some of the criticisms include:

  • The law can be used to unfairly target sex workers who are just trying to make a living consensually.
  • It impedes a woman’s right to choose what to do with her own body.
  • It’s a waste of federal resources that could be better used fighting non-consensual trafficking.
  • It drives willing sex workers underground and makes their work more dangerous.

However, there are good counterarguments too. For example, prostitution can lead to exploitation even when it looks “consensual.” And illegal sex work often goes hand-in-hand with other criminal activity that the government has an interest in stopping. There are good points on both sides of this issue.

What Are Some Legal Defenses People Use?

There are a few common legal defenses that defendants accused of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2421 try to use:

  • Lack of intent – The defendant argues they didn’t actually intend for the person to engage in prostitution or illegal sex once transported across borders.
  • Entrapment – The defendant claims they were unfairly persuaded or tricked by law enforcement into committing a crime they wouldn’t have otherwise.
  • Duress – The defendant says they were forced or coerced into transporting the person for illegal sex purposes.

These defenses argue the defendant isn’t actually morally culpable, even if they did transport someone across state lines who then engaged in illegal sex. But it’s often difficult to prove lack of intent or coercion. So these defenses don’t always work.

How Does This Law Intersect with Human Trafficking?

There’s a lot of overlap between 18 U.S.C. § 2421 and laws against sex trafficking:

  • Trafficking someone across borders for forced prostitution can be charged under both 18 U.S.C. § 2421 and sex trafficking laws.
  • 18 U.S.C. § 2421 helps enable trafficking prosecutions in cases where it’s hard to prove actual force or coercion.
  • Sections of the TVPA make it a crime to benefit financially from trafficking that violates 18 U.S.C. § 2421.

So 18 U.S.C. § 2421 provides an important tool for punishing and deterring human traffickers – even when it’s applied to cases involving consenting adults. There’s a compelling argument that reducing demand for paid sex of any kind will help reduce exploitation.

Should Prostitution Be Legal Instead?

Some people think the solution is to just make prostitution completely legal. That would eliminate 18 U.S.C. § 2421 prosecutions for consenting adults. But legalizing prostitution is controversial too:

  • Some research suggests legal prostitution increases human trafficking inflows.
  • Legalization could make it easier for minors to be exploited.
  • There are concerns about increased public health risks like HIV transmission.

There are also arguments that legalization could make conditions safer for sex workers, reduce stigma, and curb illegal activity. Like most public policy issues, there are reasonable points on both sides!

The Bottom Line

I know this law involves some complex issues. But the key takeaways are:

  • It’s a federal crime to transport someone across state or national borders for prostitution or illegal sex.
  • Penalties can include years in prison and sex offender registration.
  • The law helps enable trafficking prosecutions but also affects consenting adults.
  • There’s debate around whether it does more harm or good in consensual cases.

I hope this overview helped explain 18 U.S.C. § 2421 in simple terms! Let me know if you have any other questions.

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile

RALPH P. FRANCHO, JR

Associate

view profile

JEREMY FEIGENBAUM

Associate Attorney

view profile

ELIZABETH GARVEY

Associate

view profile

CLAIRE BANKS

Associate

view profile

RAJESH BARUA

Of-Counsel

view profile

CHAD LEWIN

Of-Counsel

view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now