A federal target letter is the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) way of letting you know you’re squarely on their radar. Essentially, it’s a notice that prosecutors believe they have substantial evidence linking you to a federal crime. It could relate to anything from alleged financial misconduct (like mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 or wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343) to a broader conspiracy charge under 18 U.S.C. § 371. The letter itself might invite you to testify before a grand jury or produce documents relevant to an ongoing investigation.
The term “target” is critical: In the eyes of federal authorities, you’re not just a person of interest—you’re potentially the focus of the entire investigation. In United States v. Myers (I recall it was in the mid-1970s, but don’t quote me on the exact year), the court discussed that being labeled a “target” typically means there’s a strong belief you’ve committed a crime. In other words, it’s a big deal.
There are loads of reasons the feds might consider you a target. Maybe you served as an executive at a company under scrutiny, or perhaps you were a participant in a group that’s now facing criminal conspiracy allegations. I’ve also seen cases where someone’s tangential involvement—like a casual text or email that looked suspicious—sparked a deeper investigation.
Under 18 U.S.C. § 371 (the federal conspiracy statute), all it takes is an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime, plus any overt act taken in furtherance of that plan. Even if your role seems minor—say you forwarded an email—federal prosecutors might still see you as part of the broader scheme. United States v. Lovasco was a landmark Supreme Court case clarifying due process concerns in federal prosecutions, emphasizing the government’s broad authority to investigate. Although that ruling centered on pre-indictment delays, it still highlights how thorough the feds can be when building a case.
If you read the letter word-for-word, you’ll probably notice formal language explaining that you’re a “target” or a “subject” of a federal grand jury investigation. Sometimes they’ll outline specific statutes—like 18 U.S.C. § 1956 for money laundering or 18 U.S.C. § 1029 for credit card fraud—if they suspect those violations. The letter often encourages you to speak with an attorney before responding and may provide a date by which you must contact them or show up for a grand jury appearance.
A federal target letter can also include warnings about lying to federal agents. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, lying to a federal investigator can be a separate crime, even if the underlying allegations end up going nowhere. So if the letter invites you for an “interview,” it’s crucial to have legal counsel present—trust me, the stakes are high, and it’s easy to misstep if you go it alone.
I totally understand that’s easier said than done, but panicking or trying to hide under a rock won’t make this letter vanish. In U.S. v. Bailey (again, I might be mixing up the exact date of that decision, but I believe it was in the early 1980s), the court recognized that defendants sometimes escalate their problems by ignoring legal documents or waiting too long to respond. If you ignore a target letter, you might be setting yourself up for a worst-case scenario—like an unexpected arrest, or losing a chance to negotiate a more favorable outcome.
I know it may seem self-serving for a lawyer to say “hire a lawyer,” but this is the most important step you can take right now. A seasoned attorney who’s dealt with federal investigations knows how to communicate with prosecutors, interpret the nuances of the letter, and guide you on your next move. Believe me, the sooner you have someone in your corner, the better chance you have of managing this situation.
If you decide to cooperate, you might need to provide documents, emails, or other evidence related to the investigation. Even if you choose not to cooperate (and that might be the right call in some cases), you still need to preserve anything the government could consider relevant. Destroying evidence can open you up to additional charges like obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 1519. The last thing you need is another layer of legal trouble.
Once you’ve got a legal team, you’ll work together to figure out the best approach. Sometimes, meeting with the prosecutors or providing voluntary statements might reduce the chances of a formal indictment—especially if you truly didn’t do anything wrong. Other times, you’ll want to hold off on talking until you see exactly what evidence the government claims to have. You might be offered a proffer session, which is a chance to speak candidly under certain protections, but only after talking it through in detail with your attorney.
Not necessarily. A target letter is a strong indication that the government has you in its sights, but it’s not a guarantee of an indictment. I’ve seen scenarios where, after a target letter was issued, evidence came to light that fully exonerated the individual. Prosecutors are people, too—they can change course if the facts don’t add up or if new information surfaces that points away from wrongdoing. However, it’s important to keep your expectations realistic: the DOJ usually doesn’t issue target letters on a whim.
In a lot of cases, if the government plans to arrest you, they’ll do so in a more organized fashion—unless they think you’re a flight risk or a danger to the community. Sometimes, responding appropriately to a target letter can actually help avoid a public arrest altogether. This is one reason it’s crucial to coordinate with your attorney. They can, in many cases, communicate with the authorities to arrange a self-surrender if charges are filed—much better than being surprised at your workplace or home.
Generally, I’d say no. It’s risky to sit down with federal agents on your own. Even innocent folks can inadvertently say the wrong thing and find themselves facing new counts of false statements under 18 U.S.C. § 1001. United States v. Brogan emphasized how just one slip can lead to separate legal trouble for lying to investigators—even if you didn’t mean to lie. Always have your attorney present during these conversations.
Yes, it can happen. If your attorney presents evidence refuting the government’s suspicions, or if the prosecutors realize the case against you is weak, they might decide not to move forward. Although this is the best-case scenario, you’ll still want to be prepared for the alternative.
If the evidence suggests some level of involvement on your end, you might be able to negotiate a plea deal, sometimes under seal. Let’s say you had a minor role in a conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371. Prosecutors might be willing to charge you with a less serious offense if you provide meaningful cooperation or if your role was truly peripheral.
In some circumstances, you could get indicted. That’s when the grand jury formally charges you with a crime. If you go to trial, the government has to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Depending on the nature of the charges, you could be facing significant prison time, fines, or other penalties. Don’t lose hope, though: every federal trial is a complex procedure, and there are legal defenses that might apply to your case—like arguing lack of intent, entrapment, or insufficient evidence.
Listen, I’ve walked clients through some extremely tense moments—getting a federal target letter ranks high on that list. Try to lean on a support system if you can. Talk to friends, family, or a counselor. The process can be long and nerve-wracking, but you don’t have to shoulder it all by yourself.
I recall reading that in 2021 the DOJ updated some of its policies regarding prosecutorial discretion, but I might be mixing up the exact date. The takeaway is that every administration slightly adjusts how aggressively they pursue certain crimes. Whether you’re suspected of white-collar offenses or drug-related charges, federal prosecutors rarely let things languish. They’ll keep building a case, and the more time you give them without a proactive response, the better prepared they are to catch you off-guard.
Receiving a federal target letter can feel like a punch to the gut. It’s intimidating, no question about it. But it doesn’t always mean you’re bound for a federal prison cell. Sometimes, it’s an early opportunity to resolve misunderstandings, present exculpatory evidence, or negotiate a more favorable arrangement. The key is to approach it smartly, with a clear head and sound legal guidance.
If you remember anything from this, let it be this: don’t ignore the letter, and don’t try to handle it on your own. The federal criminal justice system is complicated, and you deserve someone who knows how to navigate it. If you take the right steps now—like consulting an experienced attorney, preserving relevant documents, and cautiously deciding how (and if) to respond to government questions—you’ll be in a stronger position to protect your future.
(Again, this article is just general guidance, not a substitute for individualized legal advice. If you’re facing a federal target letter, please contact a lawyer right away.)
You’re not alone. Let’s take this one step at a time. You have rights. You have a voice. Now’s the time to use them—strategically and with good counsel by your side.
Todd Spodek - Nationally Recognized Criminal Attorney