When Does the Clock Start Running on PPP Fraud Charges?

Welcome to Federal Lawyers. Our goal is to help you understand exactly when your PPP exposure actually ends—because it’s probably not when you think. If you’re here calculating dates and trying to figure out when you’re finally “safe,” you need to understand something that changes everything.

Here’s what most people get wrong: they assume the 10-year statute of limitations starts from when they received their PPP loan. April 2020 loan means April 2030 exposure, right? That would be logical. That would be simple. And that would be completely wrong for most borrowers.

The clock doesn’t start from when you got the money. It starts from your LAST fraudulent act related to that loan. For most people, that wasn’t the application—it was the forgiveness application they filed in 2021 or 2022. You filed for forgiveness to END your PPP chapter. But that forgiveness application—with its certifications under penalty of perjury—became your last fraudulent act. The exit you thought would save you actually extended your exposure by one to two years.

The Forgiveness Trap: Why Your Clock Started Later Than You Think

Heres the thing most people completely misunderstand about how the statute of limitations works for PPP fraud.

When you recieved your PPP loan in 2020, you signed certifications. You made representations about your business, your employees, your payroll. If those were false, thats when your fraud began. But fraud dosent stop there. Its a continuing offense under federal law, which means every subsequent false statement restarts the clock.

Then came the forgiveness phase. Maybe six months later, maybe a year later, maybe even in 2022. You filed that forgiveness application becuase you wanted the loan converted to a grant. You wanted the chapter closed. You wanted to move on with your life. You probly thought getting forgiveness would end your legal exposure. The exact opposite is true.

That forgiveness application required new certifications. You had to certify that you used the funds apropriately. That you maintained payroll at the required levels. That you followed all the program rules. Each of those certifications was a statement under penalty of perjury—a federal crime if false.

If your original loan application was fraudulent, your forgiveness certifications were necessaraly false too. You certified you used funds properly when you hadn’t. You certified you maintained payroll when maybe you didnt have employees to begin with. You certified compliance when there was nothing legitimate to comply with.

Your forgiveness application—not your loan application—likely determines when your exposure ends. Think about the timeline. If you got your loan in April 2020 but didnt file for forgiveness until September 2021, your statute of limitations runs from September 2021. Thats September 2031—not April 2030. You just added seventeen months to your exposure without realizing it.

And heres the irony that should keep you up at night: the harder you worked to get forgiveness, the longer the government has to prosecute you. Diligent borrowers who filed forgiveness quickly after there funds ran out gave prosecutors MORE time, not less. The thing designed to close the chapter actually extended it.

The Last Act Rule: Federal Fraud Law 101

OK so understanding why this works requires knowing something about how federal fraud statutes actually operate.

Federal fraud statutes operate on whats called the “last act” rule. The statute of limitations dosent begin when you commit your first fraudulent act. It begins when you commit your last one. This exists because fraud is considered a continuing offense—each false statement, each use of fraudulent funds, each false certification restarts the clock. The system is designed so you can never outrun fraud by committing it early and then waiting.

The governments position is straightforward: your fraud wasnt complete when you submitted your application. It wasnt complete when you recieved the funds. It wasnt complete when you spent the money. Your fraud was complete when you submitted that final forgiveness application with its false certifications. Everything before that was preperation. The forgiveness application was the culmination.

The DOJ Criminal Resource Manual explicitely addresses this. For fraud schemes involving multiple acts, the statute runs from the last overt act in furtherence of the fraud. Your forgiveness application was definitely an overt act. It was in furtherence of the fraud. And for most people, it was there last one.

You cant calculate your safe date with certainty unless you know exactly when your last fraudulent act occured. Most people assume it was the loan application. But the government will argue it was the forgiveness application—and theyve got a strong argument. The certifications in that forgiveness application are seperately chargeable offenses, which gives prosecutors flexibility in determining the relevant date.

At Federal Lawyers, weve seen clients who thought they were months away from safety only to discover there exposure extends years into the future. The forgiveness trap catches almost everyone who dosent understand how the last act rule works. Its not that people are stupid—its that this rule is counterintuitive. You would naturally assume the clock starts when you first do something wrong. The law says otherwise.

Three Clocks You Might Be Running: Loan, Forgiveness, Conspiracy

Let that sink in for a moment. The situation is more complicated then most people realize. You might not be running one clock. You might be running three separate clocks simultaneously.

Clock One: The Original Loan

If you never filed for forgiveness—if you just repaid the loan in full—your clock probly started from your last use of fraudulent funds or your last false statement to the lender. That might be sometime in 2020. But almost nobody took this path. The whole point of PPP was forgiveness. Repaying a forgiveable loan is like leaving money on the table.

Clock Two: The Forgiveness Application

DEFENSE TEAM SPOTLIGHT

Todd Spodek

Lead Attorney & Founder

Featured on Netflix's "Inventing Anna," Todd Spodek brings decades of high-stakes criminal defense experience. His aggressive approach has secured dismissals and acquittals in cases others deemed unwinnable.

NY Bar Admitted Multi-State Licensed Federal Courts

Meet the Full Team

This is were most people are. You filed for forgiveness sometime between late 2020 and 2022. Your clock starts from that forgiveness date, not your loan date. If you filed in March 2022, your looking at March 2032 exposure. Thats still aproximately seven years away from now.

Clock Three: The Conspiracy Clock

Legal Scenario: What Would You Do?

Scenario

You submitted a PPP loan application during COVID and now realize some employee count numbers may have been inaccurate.

Could this be considered fraud?

Attorney's Answer

Inaccuracies in PPP applications can trigger federal fraud charges carrying up to 20 years in prison. However, honest mistakes differ from intentional misrepresentation. Documentation of your good-faith efforts is critical to your defense.

This is general information only. Contact us for advice specific to your situation.

If you conspired with anyone, their actions after your loan extend your statute of limitations. This is the one that absolutely destroys people who thought they acted alone.

You dont have to think of yourself as a conspirator for the government to treat you as one. You dont have to have made a formal agreement. If you worked with a preparer who submitted multiple fraudulent applications, you might legaly be part of a conspiracy. If a friend referred you to someone who “helped” with applications, you might be part of a conspiracy. If a lender employee pushed through questionable applications, everyone they helped might be connected in the governments eyes.

In conspiracy cases, the statute of limitations runs from the LAST overt act by ANY conspirator. Not your last act. Any conspirators last act. If someone you worked with submitted there own fraudulent forgiveness application in 2022, your exposure might extend to 2032—based on there actions, not yours.

Think about the Nieto case. He created 87 fake payroll checks for forgiveness applications. Everyone whose application he touched is potentialy connected. There clocks dont run from there individual applications. There clocks run from his last act in the conspiracy. One persons actions extended dozens of peoples exposure.

What Counts as a “Fraudulent Act”?