What are the fines and penalties for Wire Transfer Scams?: Defenses, Laws, Innovative Defense Strategies

Introduction

Recieving an indictment for wire transfer scam is a serious matter. Todd Spodek from the Spodek Law Group uses a *white glove* approach, he also gained national attention from Netflix coverage of Anna Delvey. Under 18 U.S. Code § 1343, a person face up to 20 years in federal prison if convicted. We also have offices in NYC and Los Angeles, our digital portal let you see every update in your case.

Basic Penalties for Wire Transfer Scams

Convictions for wire transfer scam often result in restitution orders. The Federal Sentencing Guidelines (18 U.S.S.G. §2B1.1) can push sentencing ranges higher. In United States v. Blumeyer, 62 F.3d 1013 (8th Cir. 1995), the court upheld a lengthy prison term based on the scheme's wide financial harm. Todd Spodek leads our team at the Spodek Law Group with fierce advocacy, we investigate every angle of your case. We remain selective with clients to ensure total commitment.

Potential Fines and Timelines

Federal prosecutors request fines up to $1,000,000 for wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 3571. An indictment can happen once a grand jury hears probable cause evidence, that process unfolds in a matter of weeks. Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure allows us to file motions to dismiss defective charges. Todd Spodek leverage our digital portal, you can upload documents so we quickly review them.

Asserting Innocence Through Evidence Challenges

We see clients get accused on wire fraud because of miscommunication or an simple error. Rule 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence let us argue that unfairly prejudicial material should be excluded. Todd Spodek hunts for weaknesses in the prosecution's proof, we use sworn affidavits and depositions. Our firm stands by you around the clock, we keep you updated with calls and messages.

Negotiating Plea Deals to Reduce Sentences

Sometimes a strong negotiation can reduce prison terms if you agree to cooperate with investigators, U.S.S.G. §3E1.1 addresses acceptance of responsibility. Todd Spodek's approach includes pre-indictment talks with prosecutors. We advise quick decisions, a delayed defense lose leverage before the grand jury. Our nationwide presence let us handle these talks from any State.

Defensive Strategies Involving Lack of Intent

Wire transfer scam charges require a showing of intent to defraud under 18 U.S.C. §1343. If we prove you lacked fraudulent aim, then the judge can dismiss the matter under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29. Todd Spodek sifts through emails, texts, and bank records, we highlight innocent explanations. Our white glove approach means no detail is overlooked, the digital portal helps you see that thoroughness.

Asserting Duress or Coercion

Some defendants claim they were forced to send funds, People v. Odum, 31 N.Y.S.3d 163, confirmed duress can negate criminal liability. We gather witness statements and phone records, Todd Spodek frames that evidence to highlight your fear. The Spodek Law Group investigate relentlessly, we push prosecutors to see your innocence. We keep you in the loop with 24/7 access, so you remain confident.

Post-Conviction Options and Appeals

A conviction for wire transfer scam can be appealed under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. That rule sets strict filing deadlines. Our team reviews transcript errors, Todd Spodek launched successful appeals by pinpointing judge mistakes. We see courts sometimes reduce sentences after a thorough briefing under 18 U.S.C. §3742. Our digital portal let you follow every filing, we want you to know each development.

Next Steps and Contact

We handle your case with the same dedication we gave to high-profile matters featured by major outlets, Todd Spodek remains accessible day or night. We incorporate technology so you can track your matter, our "white glove" service revolve around transparency. Contact us to schedule a consultation, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5 ensures your prompt initial appearance in court. This article is not legal counsel, each matter carries unique facts requiring direct attorney advice.