24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196




When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Responding to DNA & Lab Testing Fraud Allegations

Responding to DNA & Lab Testing Fraud Allegations

DNA and other lab testing has become a crucial part of many criminal cases and allegations of testing fraud can have serious ramifications. As a defense attorney, promptly investigating any hints of impropriety and building a strong response is essential. This article provides an overview of common DNA/lab testing fraud issues and defense strategies to consider.

What is DNA & Lab Testing Fraud

DNA/lab testing fraud refers to manipulation or misrepresentation of testing processes or results. Some examples include:

  • Contamination – Adding DNA from another source to a sample to achieve a desired result
  • Tampering – Physically altering a sample to change test findings
  • False reporting – Deliberately recording incorrect test results
  • Procedural violations – Not following established testing protocols

Other types of lab testing like drug or alcohol tests can face similar fraud problems.

While rare, such fraud threatens the integrity of the justice system. Even minor procedural mistakes can render results inadmissible regardless of accuracy. Understanding the common forms of lab fraud helps inform investigation and response.

Investigating Testing Fraud Allegations

The first step when hints of testing impropriety arise is conducting a thorough independent investigation. Possible avenues to pursue include:

Obtain Full Testing Documentation – Get copies of all lab paperwork including chain-of-custody logs, testing bench notes, machine printouts, etc. Compare to testing protocols to identify any deviations.

Interview Testing Personnel – Speak with the analyst(s) involved to understand processes followed and probe any areas of concern. Also talk to other lab staff familiar with procedures and equipment used.

Consult Independent Experts – Retain qualified third-party specialists to examine documentation and provide expert opinions regarding testing methods, results, and conformity to scientific standards. They can also re-run samples if available using proper protocols.

Assess Testing Lab & Analyst Credentials – Research the qualifications, certifications, past errors, and reputation of the lab where testing occurred. Also look into credentials, training record, and history of the specific analyst(s) involved. Any red flags could indicate sloppy practices or fraudulent intent.

Meticulously investigating the precise nature of alleged errors or improprieties provides the foundation for building an effective response.

Responding to DNA/Lab Testing Fraud Allegations

If investigation reveals testing deficiencies, several legal remedies may apply depending on case specifics:

File Motion to Suppress Evidence – Testing non-compliance with established scientific standards or legal testing protocols can form grounds to file a motion arguing results should be ruled inadmissible.

Allege Constitutional Rights Violation – Manipulation violating standards of due process could support a claim that constitutional rights were infringed, also justifying suppression.

Dispute Chain-of-Custody – Lapses in evidence handling logs or doubts about sample integrity could undermine the admissibility of results.

Challenge Analyst Credentials – Lack of proper analyst training/certification or history of past errors could be cited to dispute reliability of results.

Rebut Specific Findings – Independent expert findings contradicting results can be presented to refute accuracy. Or demonstrate test methodology deviations impacting reliability.

Request Additional Testing – Flaws found by independent review may warrant petitioning the court for additional testing by an accredited lab following proper protocols.

Allege Negligence – Clear lab/analyst negligence might support a civil claim regardless of criminal case outcome.

The remedies above provide a menu of options to leverage in response. Multiple approaches can be combined for the strongest case. And keep in mind that even the hint of impropriety without definitive proof may still raise enough doubt to achieve desired ends.

Avoiding Testing Fraud Problems

Mistakes and misconduct happen even in the most professional environments. However, proactive steps by both prosecution and defense can reduce risks:

Demand Accredited Labs & Certified Analysts – Insist testing only be performed by appropriately accredited labs with trained, certified technicians to reduce errors.

Require Confirmation Testing – Request additional confirmatory testing by an independent lab to identify any discrepancies indicating possible issues.

Carefully Track Chain-of-Custody – Meticulously document every transfer of evidence to spot any breaks threatening integrity.

Allow Observation Rights – Seek right for defense experts to observe testing firsthand to ensure proper methods are followed.

Fully Document All Processes & Procedures – Labs should comprehensively log all protocols, safeguards, equipment settings & outputs to enable after-the-fact review if questions arise later.

While mistakes still occur, fraud allegations can be weakened by consistent reliance on accredited facilities plus transparent and welI-documented procedures.

Final Thoughts

DNA and lab testing plays an expanding role in the justice system, but like all human endeavors it is not immune to error or even deliberate fraud. As a defense attorney, fully investigating any indications of testing improprieties provides the basis for responding. Whether flaws indicate sloppy practices or intentional misconduct, several legal remedies can be pursued to protect client rights in light of unreliable results. And upfront insistence on accredited labs, certified analysts, transparent procedures and documentation works to limit problems down the road. Understanding testing vulnerabilities and responses when issues gain traction remains an important capability for effective counsel.

I aimed to provide an overview of lab testing fraud issues and responses with empathy for those accused. Please let me know if you would like any sections expanded or additional specifics covered. I can update and refine as needed to assist with your article.

Schedule Your Consultation Now