MCA Debt Relief Options in Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania’s usury statute is straightforward, its consumer protection law is aggressive, and its courts have the procedural tools to address confessions of judgment directly. The legal environment favors the prepared business owner.

Pennsylvania’s diverse small business economy — spanning Philadelphia’s service sector, Pittsburgh’s healthcare and technology industries, and the state’s manufacturing, construction, retail, and agricultural sectors — produces consistent demand for working capital. MCA companies target Pennsylvania businesses with products that carry costs far higher than traditional financing and far higher than the terms suggest at signing.

Pennsylvania’s legal framework provides meaningful protections for MCA borrowers. The state’s usury law applies to commercial transactions, its consumer protection statute provides for treble damages, and its courts have well-established procedures for addressing confessions of judgment — a mechanism that MCA funders use aggressively in Pennsylvania.

The Legal Landscape in Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania’s usury statute, 41 P.S. § 201, limits interest on loans to 6% per annum unless a higher rate is authorized by statute. The criminal usury threshold, under 18 Pa.C.S. § 911, applies to loans with rates exceeding 25% per annum. A criminally usurious loan subjects the lender to criminal prosecution and renders the loan potentially voidable. The 25% threshold mirrors New York’s criminal usury cap and is easily exceeded by recharacterized MCAs carrying effective rates of 100% or more.

Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, 73 P.S. § 201-1 et seq., is one of the most aggressive consumer protection statutes in the mid-Atlantic region. It provides for treble damages for violations, plus attorney’s fees and costs. The statute applies to commercial transactions and covers deceptive practices in the marketing, pricing, and collection of financial products. MCA brokers who misrepresent costs, funders who refuse reconciliation while claiming the transaction is a purchase, and collectors who threaten criminal prosecution for civil debts are all exposed to UTPCPL liability.

Pennsylvania is one of the states that permits confessions of judgment under its Rules of Civil Procedure. This means MCA funders can and do file confessions of judgment in Pennsylvania courts. However, Pennsylvania’s procedures for opening and striking confessions of judgment provide meaningful remedies for business owners who have had judgments entered against them. The motion to open a confession of judgment requires the defendant to demonstrate a meritorious defense and a reasonable explanation for any delay in seeking relief — standards that are achievable when the underlying MCA is challengeable on usury or fraud grounds.

Recharacterization and Usury

The recharacterization argument in Pennsylvania proceeds on the same basis as in other jurisdictions. The court examines whether the MCA funder bore genuine risk of loss. If the funder insulated itself through fixed payments, personal guarantees, confessions of judgment, and non-functional reconciliation clauses, the transaction is a loan regardless of the label on the contract.

When the recharacterized loan’s effective APR exceeds 25%, the criminal usury statute applies. Pennsylvania’s framework mirrors New York’s in this respect: the criminal usury threshold is the same, and the consequence of exceeding it is the potential voidability of the loan and criminal liability for the lender. MCAs recharacterized as loans routinely produce effective APRs of 100% to 300%, far exceeding the 25% threshold. The gap between the threshold and the actual rate is not close. It is vast.

The recharacterization also affects the enforceability of the confession of judgment. If the underlying agreement is void as usurious, the confession of judgment contained within it has no legal foundation. A motion to strike the confession of judgment on the basis of the underlying agreement’s voidness attacks the root of the funder’s enforcement mechanism.

Your Relief Options

Usury defense. A recharacterized MCA exceeding 25% APR triggers Pennsylvania’s criminal usury statute. The defense can void the obligation or, at minimum, eliminate the interest component. The criminal liability exposure for the funder creates powerful settlement leverage independent of the civil claim.

UTPCPL claims with treble damages. Misrepresentation of costs, failure to disclose material terms, deceptive collection practices, and failure to honor reconciliation obligations are actionable under the UTPCPL. The treble damages and fee-shifting provisions create significant economic incentive to pursue claims and significant economic pressure on the funder to settle.

Motion to open or strike confessions of judgment. Pennsylvania’s Rules of Civil Procedure provide a framework for challenging confessions of judgment. A motion to open the judgment allows the court to consider the defendant’s defenses, and if those defenses are meritorious — including usury, fraud, and unconscionability — the judgment is opened and the dispute proceeds on the merits.

DEFENSE TEAM SPOTLIGHT

Todd Spodek

Lead Attorney & Founder

Featured on Netflix's "Inventing Anna," Todd Spodek brings decades of high-stakes criminal defense experience. His aggressive approach has secured dismissals and acquittals in cases others deemed unwinnable.

NY Bar Admitted Multi-State Licensed Federal Courts

Meet the Full Team

Settlement negotiation leveraging usury exposure, UTPCPL treble damages, and the cost of litigating confession-of-judgment motions provides meaningful incentive for funders to resolve Pennsylvania disputes at a significant discount. The funder’s preference for quick enforcement through confessions of judgment is disrupted when the borrower challenges the judgment and asserts affirmative claims.

Practical Steps

Assemble your documents and calculate the effective annual percentage rate of your MCA. Compare the rate to Pennsylvania’s 25% criminal usury threshold. If the rate exceeds the threshold, you have a powerful legal argument that goes to the enforceability of the entire agreement.

If a confession of judgment has been entered against you in Pennsylvania, the timeline for action is important. Consult a Pennsylvania attorney experienced in commercial financing disputes immediately. Pennsylvania’s combination of usury law, the UTPCPL’s treble damages provision, and its confession of judgment procedures creates a legal environment with multiple avenues for relief. The optimal strategy depends on your specific agreement, the procedural posture of the case, and the funder’s conduct.