24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196




When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Inadequate Internal Controls and SEC Enforcement: Investigation Risks

Inadequate Internal Controls and SEC Enforcement: Investigation Risks

When companies fail to implement adequate internal controls over financial reporting, they expose themselves to significant risks of SEC enforcement actions. Recent cases highlight how inadequate controls can lead to accounting errors, misstatements, and even fraud going undetected for years. Companies and executives who ignore internal control weaknesses or fail to prioritize remediation face stiff civil penalties, charges of negligence, and damage to their reputations.

Internal Control Requirements

Public companies are legally required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to maintain internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and to evaluate their effectiveness annually[1]. The SEC defines internal controls as processes designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of financial statements[2]. This includes having sufficient staffing, policies, training, and oversight in areas like:

  • Revenue recognition
  • Expense authorization
  • Inventory counts
  • Reconciliations
  • Segregation of duties

When companies identify material weaknesses in ICFR, they must disclose them and explain the specific remediation plans. The SEC expects prompt action to fix control gaps, not delays of months or years[3].

Common SEC Charges for Control Failures

The SEC frequently brings enforcement actions against public companies that fail to implement or maintain adequate internal controls. Recent charges involve:

  • Books and records violations – Inaccurate financial records due to weak controls[1].
  • Failure to evaluate ICFR – Not completing required annual ICFR evaluations[3].
  • Deceptive disclosures – Misleading investors about control weaknesses[5].
  • FCPA violations – Bribery and corruption resulting from poor compliance controls[4].

The SEC often charges both companies and individuals like CEOs or CFOs who had responsibility for controls[5].

Investigation Triggers

Certain events tend to spur SEC investigations into internal controls, such as[6]:

  • Restatements – Correcting serious errors in financial reports due to control failures.
  • Whistleblower tips – Complaints to the SEC about accounting irregularities or excessive pressure to meet targets.
  • Bankruptcies – Companies collapsing soon after giving clean control opinions.
  • M&A activity – Control problems coming to light during due diligence.

In addition, the SEC uses data analytics to spot red flags like unusual revenue trends, suspicious patterns in disclosures, or frequent auditor changes.

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

Investigation Process and Defenses

The SEC enforcement investigation process typically involves[2]:

  1. Document requests – Demanding emails, financial records, policies, board minutes, etc.
  2. Executive testimony – Interviewing or deposing senior managers about controls.
  3. Wells notices – Formally warning targets they may face charges.
  4. Settlements – Resolving charges before litigation by paying fines and penalties.
  5. Litigation – Filing civil complaints in federal court.

Companies have several potential defenses against charges of inadequate controls[2]:

  • Showing controls were reasonable and documented, even if they failed.
  • Blaming lapses on rogue employees circumventing controls.
  • Arguing control weaknesses were disclosed properly to investors.
  • Demonstrating diligent remediation efforts.
  • Highlighting reliance on competent external auditors.

However, companies should be aware that merely having written policies is insufficient if they are not applied rigorously. And the SEC often counters that the “tone at the top” encouraged aggressive accounting or discouraged transparency.

Penalties and Reputational Damage

When control failures lead to charges, companies face harsh penalties even if they settle cases. Recent SEC settlements include[1] [3] [5]:

  • Fines from $1 million to over $100 million.
  • Executive clawbacks of compensation.
  • Mandated improvements to ICFR.
  • Multi-year monitoring by an independent consultant.
  • Admissions of wrongdoing.

In addition to direct costs, companies suffer significant reputational damage. Customers, investors, and business partners lose trust after learning about accounting improprieties and negligent oversight. Regulators also often force governance changes like director resignations and stronger committee oversight.

Best Practices for Robust Controls

Given the severe consequences, public companies should take all necessary steps to implement and monitor robust internal controls[6]:

  • Perform thorough ICFR risk assessments.
  • Maintain adequate staffing in key functions like accounting.
  • Document all policies; review and update regularly.
  • Rigorously test controls; investigate failures.
  • Foster a culture of transparency and compliance.
  • Provide frequent ICFR training.
  • Rotate staff to avoid conflicts.
  • Welcome whistleblowers and address concerns.
  • Report control weaknesses promptly; remediate quickly.

While mistakes happen at times, companies should show regulators they take financial reporting seriously and act responsibly when issues arise. A pattern of neglecting internal controls poses unacceptable risks in the current enforcement environment.


[1] SEC Charges Andeavor for Inadequate Controls Around Authorization of Stock Buyback Plan

[2] Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Enforcement Enforcement Manual

[3] SEC Charges Four Public Companies With Longstanding ICFR Failures

[4] SEC Enforcement Actions: FCPA Cases

[5] SEC Charges The Kraft Heinz Company and Two Former Executives for Engaging in Years-Long Accounting Scheme

[6] Enforcement Overview

Schedule Your Consultation Now