How Can I Speak to a Federal Healthcare Fraud Defense Attorney Directly
The most direct path to speaking with an attorney about a federal healthcare fraud matter is through a direct phone call to the attorney’s office, a request for an initial consultation through the attorney’s website, or a referral from a trusted colleague or professional contact who has worked with the attorney previously.
The initial contact should be made promptly. The factors that determine the quality of the defense in a federal healthcare fraud investigation are substantially time-dependent. Pre-indictment intervention is available only before the indictment. Administrative proceedings have their own deadlines. The preservation of records must begin immediately. The sooner the initial consultation occurs, the more of the available options remain open.
What to Prepare for the Initial Call
The initial consultation with a federal healthcare fraud defense attorney is most productive when the practitioner arrives with a basic account of the situation: the nature of the contact that prompted the consultation, the approximate time period of the conduct at issue, the agencies involved if any contact has occurred, the approximate volume of controlled substance prescribing and the specialty in which the prescribing occurred, and any specific documents that have been received, such as subpoenas, target letters, or administrative orders.
The practitioner does not need to have reviewed every potentially relevant record before the initial call. They do not need to have assessed their own exposure. They do not need to have reached any conclusions about the strength or weakness of their position. The attorney’s task in the initial consultation is to elicit the relevant information and provide an initial assessment, not to receive a pre-packaged analysis from the practitioner.
The Attorney-Client Relationship From the First Call
The attorney-client privilege attaches from the first communication in which the practitioner consults the attorney for the purpose of obtaining legal advice. The first phone call, if it involves a substantive discussion of the practitioner’s situation and a request for legal guidance, is a privileged communication. The practitioner need not worry that what is said in the initial inquiry will be disclosed to investigators or used in any proceeding.
Need Help With Your Case?
Don't face criminal charges alone. Our experienced defense attorneys are ready to fight for your rights and freedom.
- 100% Confidential
- Response Within 1 Hour
- No Obligation Consultation
Or call us directly:
(212) 300-5196The initial consultation typically results in one of three outcomes: a determination that the matter warrants ongoing representation and a discussion of the representation’s terms; a determination that the matter does not currently require formal representation but that the practitioner should monitor specific indicators and re-contact if they appear; or a referral to a different attorney whose specific experience is better matched to the specific demands of the matter. Each outcome provides value, and none of them is available without the initial contact.
Urgency and the Response Timeline
Certain circumstances require that the first contact occur within hours rather than days. The execution of a search warrant at the practice, the receipt of an immediate suspension order, the receipt of a target letter with a short response window, or the service of a grand jury subpoena with an imminent return date are circumstances in which the initial consultation cannot be deferred to a convenient appointment time. Attorneys experienced in federal healthcare fraud defense understand that these circumstances arise and are generally available to accept urgent calls in genuine emergencies.
Todd Spodek
Lead Attorney & Founder
Featured on Netflix's "Inventing Anna," Todd Spodek brings decades of high-stakes criminal defense experience. His aggressive approach has secured dismissals and acquittals in cases others deemed unwinnable.
The practitioner who makes the call on the day the agents appear is the practitioner whose options are still largely intact. The practitioner who makes the call three weeks later, after having spoken to the agents, produced records informally, and discussed the matter with colleagues, has made decisions in those three weeks that may have narrowed the options in ways that the consultation will need to address before it can look forward.
The First Step
There is no elaborate preparation required before making the initial call. There is no threshold of certainty about the severity of the situation that must be reached before the call is appropriate. The call is appropriate as soon as there is reason to believe that a federal agency has an interest in the practice’s controlled substance prescribing. That reason may be indirect, tentative, and uncertain. It is sufficient. The consultation will provide the information necessary to assess whether the reason is well-founded and what the appropriate response is. The call is the first step, and the first step is available now.