FEDERAL CRIMINAL DEFENSE

Federal Appeals

Experienced appellate advocacy in federal courts of appeals and the United States Supreme Court.

10,000+ Cases Handled
50+ Years Experience
Former Prosecutors
24/7 Availability

Understanding Federal Appeals

A federal criminal conviction does not have to be the final word. The federal appellate process provides an important mechanism for challenging convictions and sentences that resulted from legal errors. Our appellate attorneys have extensive experience before the United States Courts of Appeals and are skilled at identifying and presenting the legal issues that can result in reversed convictions, vacated sentences, and new trials.

The Federal Appeals Process

Federal criminal appeals are filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which the conviction occurred. A notice of appeal must be filed within 14 days of the judgment. The appellate process involves a thorough review of the trial record, identification of legal errors, preparation of written briefs, and in many cases, oral argument before a panel of three circuit judges. The standard of review varies depending on the type of error alleged, with some issues reviewed de novo and others for abuse of discretion or plain error.

Common Grounds for Federal Appeals

Federal criminal appeals can be based on a wide range of legal errors, including constitutional violations (Fourth Amendment search and seizure issues, Fifth Amendment self-incrimination issues, Sixth Amendment right to counsel issues), evidentiary errors (improper admission or exclusion of evidence), instructional errors (incorrect jury instructions), prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance of counsel, sentencing errors (misapplication of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, procedural unreasonableness, substantive unreasonableness), and sufficiency of the evidence. Each ground requires different analysis and briefing strategies.

Post-Conviction Relief

In addition to direct appeals, our firm handles post-conviction motions under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255, which allows federal prisoners to challenge their convictions or sentences based on constitutional violations, jurisdictional errors, or sentences in excess of the maximum authorized by law. Section 2255 motions are the primary vehicle for raising claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, newly discovered evidence, and retroactive changes in the law. We also handle compassionate release motions under 18 U.S.C. Section 3582(c)(1)(A).

Appellate work requires different skills than trial advocacy. Our appellate attorneys are skilled legal writers and researchers who know how to frame issues persuasively for appellate judges. If you or a loved one has been convicted in federal court, contact us to discuss your appellate options.

Potential Penalties

Offense Level Penalties
Direct Appeal Timeline Notice of appeal due within 14 days of judgment
Section 2255 Motion 1-year filing deadline from final judgment
Possible Outcomes Reversal, remand, new trial, resentencing, or sentence reduction
Compassionate Release No filing deadline; available when extraordinary circumstances exist

Defense Strategies We Use

Comprehensive review of the trial record for legal errors
Challenging constitutional violations at trial and sentencing
Attacking improper evidentiary rulings and jury instructions
Raising ineffective assistance of counsel claims
Challenging Federal Sentencing Guidelines calculations
Filing compassionate release motions for eligible clients

Frequently Asked Questions

You must file a notice of appeal within 14 days of the entry of judgment. This deadline is strictly enforced. For Section 2255 post-conviction motions, the deadline is generally one year from the date the conviction becomes final. Contact an appellate attorney immediately after sentencing to preserve your rights.
Generally, appellate courts review only the record from the trial court and do not consider new evidence. However, newly discovered evidence can be raised through a post-conviction motion under Section 2255 or a motion for a new trial under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Under the Sixth Amendment and the Supreme Court's decision in Strickland v. Washington, you have the right to effective legal representation. To prove ineffective assistance, you must show that your attorney's performance was deficient and that the deficiency prejudiced the outcome of your case. These claims are typically raised in Section 2255 motions.

Todd Spodek in the Media

Watch our managing partner discuss criminal defense strategy on major news networks.

Why Clients Trust Spodek Law Group
Todd Spodek — Federal Appeals Process
CNN: Federal Appellate Court Explained
Legal Commentary: Winning Federal Appeals
Post-Conviction Relief Options
Todd Spodek — Are You Garbage Podcast

Fighting Federal Appeals Charges?

Don't face these serious charges alone. Our experienced attorneys are available 24/7 to discuss your case.

Call (212) 300-5196