Federal Defense

Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Healthcare Fraud (18 USC 1347)

Todd Spodek, Managing Partner

Prominently Featured In:

CNN
Netflix
Newsweek
Business Insider
Time

Welcome to Federal Lawyers. We are a NYC based criminal defense firm that has spent over a decade defending healthcare professionals facing federal fraud charges. Our goal is to give you the information that other sites will not provide – the real sentencing data, the actual numbers from federal court, and the strategic realities that determine whether you lose your license or your freedom. If you are reading this because you just learned about healthcare fraud charges, you need to understand something that will immediately change how you think about your situation.

The statutory maximum for healthcare fraud under [18 USC 1347](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1347) is 10 years. Every charging document mentions it. Every prosecutor emphasizes it at every hearing. Every defendant with a medical license lies awake calculating what 10 years means for their career, their family, their life. But heres the truth that the [USSC sentencing data](https://www.ussc.gov/research/quick-facts/health-care-fraud) reveals: the average actual sentence for healthcare fraud in fiscal year 2024 was 27 months. Not 10 years – twenty-seven months. The statutory maximum is 4.4 times the average sentence actually imposed.

And heres the number thats even more revealing. Only 2.8% of healthcare fraud defendants faced mandatory minimum penalties at all. And of that tiny percentage, more than half were relieved of those minimums. The system isnt designed to imprison doctors for decades. Its designed to extract guilty pleas through fear of maximums that almost no one recieves.

When Billing Becomes Crime

Heres were most healthcare professionals make there first mistake. They think healthcare fraud requires intent to steal. It dosent. Under [18 USC 1347](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1347), the government only needs to prove you knowingly executed or attempted to execute a scheme to defraud a healthcare benefit program. The critical word is “scheme.” Prosecutors define scheme broadly – very broadly.

our lead attorney has defended physicians who provided legitimate medical care to real patients with genuine conditions. The patients got better. The insurance paid. Everyone seemed satisfied. Then years later, prosecutors reviewed the billing codes and decided the services werent “medically necessary.” That retroactive determination – made by lawyers, not doctors – transformed routine medical practice into federal healthcare fraud.

OK so heres the part that catches most doctors off guard. Medical necessity has no objective definition. Its not like a blood test were you either meet the threshold or you dont. Medical necessity is judgment – your clinical judgment as a physician. But prosecutors get to second-guess that judgment years after the fact, with hindsight, with cherry-picked expert witnesses, with unlimited resources to build there case. Your documented medical reasoning becomes evidence of a “scheme.”

FREE CONSULTATION

Need Help With Your Case?

Don't face criminal charges alone. Our experienced defense attorneys are ready to fight for your rights and freedom.

  • 100% Confidential
  • Response Within 1 Hour
  • No Obligation Consultation

Or call us directly:

(212) 300-5196

The ambiguity is the trap. Every doctor who bills insurance makes judgement calls about medical necessity. Every billing code involves interpretation. The line between aggressive billing and criminal fraud exists – but prosecutors draw that line, not physicians. And they draw it after reviewing your billing patterns, after identifing outliers, after decideing that you should have known better.

The Loss Table That Controls Everything

The [loss calculation under USSG 2B1.1](https://www.ussc.gov/guidelines/primers/loss-calculation) determines your sentence more then any other factor. More then your criminal history. More then the judges personal philosophy. More then your years of legitimate medical practice. The prosecutors number – the loss amount they calculate – is the most important number in your entire case.

Healthcare fraud starts with a base offense level of 7. Then the loss table adds levels:

Todd Spodek
DEFENSE TEAM SPOTLIGHT

Todd Spodek

Lead Attorney & Founder

Featured on Netflix's "Inventing Anna," Todd Spodek brings decades of high-stakes criminal defense experience. His aggressive approach has secured dismissals and acquittals in cases others deemed unwinnable.

NY Bar Admitted Multi-State Licensed Federal Courts
Meet the Full Team
  • $6,500 or less: +0 levels 
  • $15,000 to $40,000: +4 levels 
  • $95,000 to $150,000: +8 levels 
  • $250,000 to $550,000: +12 levels 
  • $550,000 to $1,500,000: +14 levels 
  • $1,500,000 to $3,500,000: +16 levels 
  • $3,500,000 to $9,500,000: +18 levels 

The cliff effects are absolutley brutal. Going from $549,999 to $550,001 – a difference of two dollars – triggers a 2-level increase. That can mean 6-12 additional months in prison. Two dollars. Half a year. Prosecutors know exactley were these cliffs are. There loss calculations almost allways land just above a threshold. The final number is never $540,000. Its $560,000. Never $1.4 million. Always $1.6 million.

And heres the calculation that destroys healthcare defendants who thought there billing was legitimate. Under the guidelines, loss includes “intended loss” – not just actual loss. What does this mean practicaly? Every allegedly fraudulent bill you ever submitted over years of practice gets added to the loss calculation. Even if patients recieved real care. Even if insurance actualy paid correctly. Even if no one complained. The prosecutors add up every questionable bill and call the total “intended loss.”

193 Defendants in One Day

Share This Article:
Todd Spodek
ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Todd Spodek

Managing Partner

With decades of experience in high-stakes federal criminal defense, Todd Spodek has built a reputation for aggressive, strategic representation. Featured on Netflix's "Inventing Anna," he has successfully defended clients facing federal charges, white-collar allegations, and complex criminal cases in federal courts nationwide.

Bar Admissions: New York State Bar New Jersey State Bar U.S. District Court, SDNY U.S. District Court, EDNY
View Attorney Profile

Community Discussion

Real questions and discussions from readers about this topic.

52
RD retired_DEA_agent Former Federal Agent 2w ago

Former investigator perspective on this topic

Retired OIG special agent here. Spent 18 years on the enforcement side. Reading this article and the comments — I want to offer some perspective from the other side of the table.

Most investigations start with data, not complaints. PDMP data, Medicare billing data, pharmacy purchasing records. By the time an agent contacts you, they've usually been looking at your numbers for months. That's why having good documentation matters — the data will flag you, but the documentation either explains the data or doesn't.

57
FF former_fed_investigator Former Federal Agent 2w ago

Talking. Hands down. Doctors who talked to agents without a lawyer — trying to explain their way out of it — gave us 80% of the evidence we needed. Every single time. Get a lawyer first. Always.

46
FM fed_med_lawyer Attorney 2w ago

Seconding this emphatically. I've represented dozens of healthcare providers. The ones who called me BEFORE talking to agents had dramatically better outcomes than the ones who called AFTER. It's not about having something to hide — it's about having your rights protected from the start.

31
WP worried_physician Physician 2w ago

This is incredibly valuable perspective. Can you share — what's the single biggest mistake you saw doctors make when they first learned they were being investigated?

37
SP small_practice_MD Solo Practitioner 2w ago

How much does a federal healthcare fraud attorney actually cost?

I need to talk to someone but I'm a solo practitioner. I don't have a hospital legal department behind me. What does it actually cost to retain a federal healthcare defense attorney? Just a consultation vs. ongoing representation? Can I even afford this?

50
FM fed_med_lawyer Attorney 2w ago

Typical ranges:

- Initial consultation: Free to $500. Many firms offer free phone consultations.
- Pre-investigation advisory/compliance review: $3,000–$10,000
- Responding to a subpoena: $5,000–$15,000
- Full investigation representation: $25,000–$75,000+
- Trial defense: $100,000–$500,000+

The earlier you engage, the less it costs. A $5,000 consultation that prevents a $50,000 investigation is the best money you'll ever spend. Most attorneys will work out payment plans for solo practitioners.

28
SI survived_investigation Physician — Investigated & Cleared 2w ago

I paid about $35k total for my defense over 18 months. Was it painful? Yes. Would I do it again? In a heartbeat. The alternative — trying to handle it myself or hiring a cheap general attorney — would have cost me my license and my freedom.

36
WP worried_physician Physician 2w ago

Going through exactly what this article describes — anyone else?

Just read this article about "Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Healthcare Fraud (18 USC 1347)" and it hit close to home. I'm a internal medicine doctor and I've been losing sleep over this. A colleague in my practice group just got investigated. I haven't been contacted directly by any agency yet but the anxiety is crushing. Anyone been through something similar?

57
FM fed_med_lawyer Attorney 2w ago

First: do NOT speak to any federal agent without counsel. Period. Not the DEA, not the OIG, not the FBI. You have the right to counsel and exercising that right cannot be held against you.

Second: get a consultation NOW, before anything formal happens. Pre-investigation counsel is dramatically more effective (and less expensive) than post-indictment defense. Many healthcare fraud defense attorneys offer free initial consultations.

Third: do NOT alter any records. Do NOT destroy any documents. Do NOT discuss this with staff beyond what's necessary for patient care. Any of those actions can become separate criminal charges (obstruction, evidence tampering) even if the underlying prescribing was entirely legitimate.

39
BT been_there_doc Physician — Investigated & Cleared 2w ago

Went through a DEA investigation 3 years ago. It was the worst 18 months of my life but I came out clean. Best advice: get a lawyer who specifically handles federal healthcare cases (not a general criminal attorney), follow their instructions to the letter, and keep practicing medicine. The investigation itself is not a conviction and most of your patients still need you.

19
PC pharma_compliance PharmD 2w ago

If you haven't already, start documenting everything meticulously going forward. Every prescribing decision should have clear clinical justification in the chart. This protects you regardless of whether an investigation materializes.

35
KC ketamine_clinic_owner Ketamine Provider 2w ago

Anyone running a ketamine clinic dealing with these issues?

I operate a ketamine-assisted therapy practice and the regulatory landscape feels like it changes monthly. My state medical board issued new ketamine prescribing guidelines. How are other ketamine providers navigating this?

33
HD healthcare_defense_atty Attorney 2w ago

Ketamine clinics are an emerging enforcement target. The Schedule III classification gives you more flexibility than Schedule II, but the "legitimate medical purpose" standard still applies. The biggest risk areas I see: (1) inadequate patient screening, (2) lack of follow-up care, (3) advertising that makes medical claims beyond what's supported, (4) corporate practice of medicine violations if non-physicians have ownership stakes. Get a compliance review done proactively.

24
AC anesthesia_colleague Anesthesiologist 2w ago

Running a ketamine clinic since 2021. The key is airtight protocols and documentation. We have:
- Written treatment protocols for every indication
- Informed consent that specifically addresses off-label use
- Pre-treatment screening including psychological evaluation
- Monitoring during and after infusion
- Follow-up documentation
- Clear exclusion criteria

The DEA has been more interested in compounding pharmacies than individual clinics so far, but that could change. Stay current with ASA and APA guidelines.

31
SO spouse_of_doc 1w ago

My spouse is a doctor and I’m terrified after reading this

My spouse is a pain management specialist and a colleague's practice was raided and now we're worried ours could be next. We have two young kids. I don't know anything about criminal defense. How do we even start? How much does this cost? Can they take our house?

51
HD healthcare_defense_atty Attorney 1w ago

I understand the fear. Here's what you need to know:

1. Attorney fees: Federal healthcare fraud defense typically costs $25,000-75,000 depending on the stage and complexity. Pre-investigation work is on the lower end.

2. Your home: In most states, homestead exemptions protect your primary residence. Federal forfeiture requires a direct connection between the property and the alleged criminal activity — simply being a doctor who's investigated doesn't put your house at risk.

3. First step: Call a federal healthcare fraud defense attorney this week. Not a general lawyer. Someone who has handled DEA/OIG cases before. Most will do a free phone consultation to assess the situation.

4. Don't panic: Investigation ≠ charges. Charges ≠ conviction. Many investigations are closed without action.

31
BT been_there_doc 1w ago

I'm the spouse of a physician who went through a 2-year DEA investigation. It was resolved favorably. The emotional toll is real — please consider therapy for both of you. We found a support group for medical professionals under investigation that helped enormously. You're not alone in this.

31
PO pharmacy_owner_worried PharmD 3w ago

Pharmacist perspective on “Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Healthcare Fraud”

Running an independent pharmacy and this topic affects us directly. Our state board just issued new guidelines that seem to conflict with DEA expectations. It feels like there's no right answer sometimes. Any other pharmacists dealing with this?

34
HD healthcare_defense_atty Attorney 3w ago

Pharmacists are increasingly being named in federal healthcare fraud cases. Your documentation is your shield. Invest in a compliance program if you don't have one — it's far cheaper than a defense. And know that you DO have the right to refuse to fill prescriptions you believe are not for a legitimate medical purpose. That right is explicitly recognized in federal regulation.

27
CP chain_pharmacist_anon PharmD 3w ago

You're not alone. The "corresponding responsibility" doctrine puts us in an impossible position. Document EVERYTHING — every conversation with a prescriber about a questionable script, every refusal, every verification call. If you have a compliance program, follow it religiously. If you don't have one, get one yesterday.

30
JG just_graduated_MD Resident 1w ago

Just started practice — is this something I should worry about from day one?

I just finished fellowship and started at a private pain clinic. Reading about "Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Health" is terrifying for someone just starting out. Should I be getting my own malpractice attorney from day one? What should I be doing differently as a new practitioner to protect myself?

40
SP senior_physician Physician — 20yr 1w ago

The fact that you're thinking about this early is a good sign. Three things:\n\n1. Document meticulously. Every prescribing decision should have clear clinical justification. "Patient reports pain" is not enough. Physical exam findings, functional assessments, treatment plans.\n\n2. Get familiar with your state PDMP and check it for every controlled substance prescription. Make it a habit from day one.\n\n3. Find a mentor in your practice who models good prescribing practices. Observe how they handle difficult patients, how they document, how they say no when needed.\n\nYou don't need a defense attorney on retainer, but knowing who you'd call if needed is smart.

22
HD healthcare_defense_atty Attorney 1w ago

I'll add: make sure your malpractice insurance includes regulatory defense coverage (not just civil malpractice). Many policies exclude coverage for DEA/licensing board actions. Ask your carrier specifically. If they don't cover it, supplemental regulatory defense insurance is available and relatively inexpensive for new practitioners.

23
CM clinic_manager_anon Practice Administrator 3w ago

What should clinic staff know about this topic?

I'm a practice manager at a pain management clinic. After reading about "Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Health" — what should front-line staff (receptionists, medical assistants, billing staff) know? We want to make sure we're not inadvertently creating problems. Should we be training staff differently?

21
HC healthcare_consultant Compliance 3w ago

Key things for staff:

1. Never alter medical records after the fact for any reason
2. If a federal agent shows up, be polite but say "I need to contact our attorney before providing any information"
3. Don't discuss patient cases with anyone outside the practice
4. Follow your office's prescription verification protocol exactly — no shortcuts
5. Document any patient behavior that seems concerning (doctor shopping, lost prescriptions, etc.)

Annual compliance training for all staff is worth every penny.

16
DD dental_doc DDS 3w ago

Does this apply to podiatrists too?

I'm a veterinarian with a DEA registration. Most of the articles I see focus on physicians and pain management. Are podiatrists really at risk for DEA scrutiny?

29
FM fed_med_lawyer Attorney 3w ago

Yes. Any DEA registrant who prescribes controlled substances is subject to the same federal standards. Dentists are increasingly scrutinized for opioid prescribing — the CDC's prescribing guidelines have been applied to dental practice. Veterinarians have seen a rise in diversion cases (drugs prescribed for animals being diverted to human use). The DEA does not distinguish by specialty — they look at prescribing patterns and whether they're consistent with legitimate medical practice.

Ask the Community

Schedule Your Free, No Cost, No Obligation Consultation Today

Every minute matters when you are facing criminal charges. Contact us immediately for a free, confidential consultation.

Federal Lawyers By The Numbers

36 Cases Handled This Year and counting
15,536+ Total Clients Served since 2005
95% Case Success Rate dismissals & reduced charges
50+ Years Combined Experience in criminal defense

Data as of February 2026

URGENT

Take Control of Your Situation

Our team is standing by to discuss your legal options

Get Advice From An Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyer

All You Have To Do Is Call (212) 300-5196 To Receive Your Free Case Evaluation.