Fort Worth PPP Loan Fraud Lawyers

Fort Worth PPP Loan Fraud Lawyers

You took out a PPP loan during the pandemic. Your business needed help. Or maybe you saw an opportunity and took it without thinking too hard about the consequences. That was 2020 or 2021. Now your seeing news stories about prosecutions across Texas, hearing about neighbors and business associates getting indicted, and wondering if your next.

Welcome to Spodek Law Group. Our goal is to explain exactly whats happening with PPP fraud prosecutions in the Northern District of Texas – the federal court that covers Fort Worth, Dallas, and most of north Texas. This isnt the sanitized legal information you find on other websites. This is what were actualy seeing in federal court right now. And if you took a PPP loan with any irregularities, you need to understand whats coming before it arrives at your door.

Heres the uncomfortable truth that most Fort Worth business owners dont realize: the investigation into your loan has already happened. The SBA didnt distribute $800 billion and hope people would be honest. They built sophisticated data analytics systems that cross-referenced every single application with IRS records, state employment data, bank statements, and social security information. If there was a discrepency – any discrepency at all – your file got flagged. That flag has been sitting in a federal database for years. The only question is wheather prosecutors have gotten to your file yet.

The Texas Problem

OK so heres something unique about PPP fraud in Texas that defendants in other states dont face. Texas has one of the largest concentrations of small businesses in America. The combination of no state income tax, a pro-business environment, and an entrepreneurial culture created millions of PPP applications. More applications means more opportunities for fraud. And federal prosecutors in the Northern District of Texas have been methodicaly working through the flagged files for years.

The Northern District of Texas has become one of the most aggressive districts in the country for PPP fraud prosecution. The U.S. Attorneys office in Fort Worth and Dallas have dedicated resources specificaly to pandemic fraud cases. They have specialized units focused on nothing but COVID relief fraud. And they have years of data showing exactly which applications dont match the underlying documentation.

In 2024, multiple Fort Worth area residents were sentenced for PPP fraud schemes. One defendant recieved over 5 years in federal prison for obtaining fraudulent loans totaling more than $1.5 million. Five years in federal prison. And heres the part that should concern you: prosecutors traced every single application, every bank transfer, every fake employee. The digital trail was completley visible to investigators from day one.

If you used any kind of loan broker, consultant, or online service to help with your PPP application, the government probly already has records of that relationship. These services kept logs. They retained customer data. And when federal investigators came with grand jury subpoenas, they handed everything over. Your “anonymous” application wasnt anonymous at all.

How They Actually Build Cases in the Northern District

The Northern District of Texas follows a methodical approach to PPP fraud prosecution that most defendants dont understand untill its too late. Heres how these cases actualy come together.

First, the SBA Office of Inspector General runs data analytics across every PPP application. They compare what you claimed on the application against what you reported to the IRS, what your Texas Workforce Commission records show, and what your bank records actualy reflect. If the numbers dont match, your file gets flagged. This happens automaticaly. No human being needs to look at your application for it to end up in an investigation queue.

Second, the flags get prioritized. Bigger dollar amounts go first. Applications with multiple red flags go first. Cases connected to known fraudsters go first. But they dont stop there. Every cooperating defendant provides more names. Every successful prosecution reveals more patterns. The net keeps expanding across the DFW metroplex and beyond.

Third, grand jury subpoenas start going out. Your bank recieves a subpoena for your records. Your accountant might get one. Your business partners might get called to testify. You wont know about any of this. Grand jury proceedings are completley secret. The first indication your in trouble might be FBI agents at your door or a target letter arriving at your home.

Todd Spodek tells clients the same thing about this process: “By the time federal agents contact you, the investigation is essentialy complete. Theyve already obtained your bank records, your tax returns, and possibly statements from people you worked with. The question isnt wheather they have evidence. The question is what your going to do about it.”

Heres what makes the Northern District particularley dangerous for defendants. Texas recieved more PPP loan money than almost any other state. Dallas-Fort Worth alone had billions of dollars in PPP disbursements. The sheer volume of cases means prosecutors have seen every scheme, every excuse, and every defense. They know exactley how to prove fraud using documents you cant explain away.

Real Fort Worth Sentences

Lets talk about what actualy happens when PPP fraud cases go to sentencing in the Northern District of Texas. Not hypotheticals. Real cases with real consequences.

A Fort Worth man recieved 63 months in federal prison for a PPP fraud scheme totaling $1.8 million. He submitted fraudulent applications for multiple businesses, created fake payroll records, and fabricated employee documentation. The government found everything. Bank records showed were the money actualy went – luxury vehicles, real estate, personal expenses. Sixty-three months – thats more than five years.

In Dallas, a defendant was sentenced to 70 months for orchestrating a $3 million PPP fraud scheme. He had recruited others to submit fraudulent applications and took a percentage of each loan. The scheme involved dozens of fake businesses across the metroplex. Every single one got traced back to him through bank records, phone records, and cooperating witnesses.

A Tarrant County woman recieved 46 months for obtaining $900,000 in fraudulent PPP and EIDL loans. She created fake businesses with fake employees and submitted fabricated tax documents. Forty-six months – thats almost four years in federal prison. Plus restitution. Plus supervised release. Plus a felony record that follows her forever.

The pattern is clear. Federal judges in the Northern District are handing down serious prison sentences for PPP fraud. The “everyone was confused during COVID” defense dosent work anymore. Judges have heard every excuse. Theyre tired of it. Now theyre sentencing accordingly.

According to the U.S. Sentencing Commission, the average federal sentence for fraud offenses involving government benefits was 29 months in fiscal year 2024. But PPP fraud cases involving larger amounts or aggravating factors are running significantley higher. The defendants who organized schemes, recruited others, or used sophisticated methods are looking at 5-7 years. Some are getting more.

The Cooperation Paradox

Heres the thing about cooperation that most defendants get completley wrong. They think cooperation means confessing and hoping for mercy. Thats not how it works. Cooperation in federal court means providing valuable information the government dosent already have. And by 2025, the government has already extracted most of that information from earlier cooperators.

Think about the timeline. PPP loans were distributed in 2020 and 2021. The first wave of prosecutions began in 2022. The first cooperators – the ones who came forward early – got the best deals. They named names. They explained schemes. They testified against co-conspirators. In exchange, they recieved significantley reduced sentences.

But every cooperator provided information about other people. Every guilty plea generated more evidence. Every successful prosecution taught prosecutors what patterns to look for. By now, the government has accumulated years of cooperation agreements and thousands of pages of evidence.

So if your thinking about cooperating now, the question is: what can you tell them that they dont already know? If your offering information theyve already obtained from three other cooperators, your cooperation has limited value. If you can provide information about someone higher up the chain who they havent caught yet, your cooperation might still be valuable.

The window for valuable cooperation has largely closed. The defendants who had the most to offer cooperated years ago. Whats left now is a narrower path that requires strategic thinking about what you actualy have to trade.

What SBA Data Analytics Already Knows

The SBA didnt just collect applications and hope people were honest. They built systems specificaly designed to catch fraud after the fact. These systems have been running for years. If your application had problems, they know.

Heres what the cross-referencing looks like in practice. Your PPP application claimed a certain number of employees and a certain average payroll. The SBA compares those numbers to what you reported on your quarterly tax filings and your annual returns. If you claimed 15 employees making $80,000 average salary on your PPP application, but your 2019 tax filings show 3 employees making $45,000, thats a flag. Not a “they might investigate someday” flag. A “your file is in the prosecution queue” flag.

The IP address you used to submit your application? Logged and analyzed. If your application came from a residential address but claimed a business with 50 employees and a commercial location, investigators noticed. If multiple applications came from the same IP address, they know exactley which ones and who submitted them.

Your bank account activity before and after recieving PPP funds? Cross-referenced against your claimed expenses. The analytics compare your deposits and withdrawals. If you deposited PPP funds and immediately transferred them to a personal account, bought a truck, or made payments that clearly werent payroll, the pattern is visible. Every transaction is documented.

The SBA identified specific indicators they use to flag applications. Duplicate EINs across multiple applications. Payroll numbers that dont match IRS records. Applications from newly created businesses with no operating history. Bank accounts opened right before the loan was obtained. Phone numbers or addresses shared across multiple applications. If your application triggered any of these flags, your file has been sitting in an investigation queue for years.

Pre-Indictment Intervention: Your Narrowing Window

If you havent been contacted by federal authorities yet, you still have options. If youve already recieved a target letter or been arrested, those options have narrowed significantley. Understanding the difference could save you years.

Pre-indictment intervention means approaching the government before they approach you. Through an experianced federal defense attorney, you can explore wheather voluntary disclosure and cooperation might resolve the matter without charges. This only works under specific circumstances: you havent been contacted yet, you have something valuable to offer, and you approach it correctly.

The benefits of pre-indictment intervention include credit for acceptance of responsibility, potentially avoiding the most serious charges, and demonstrating good faith that can influence sentencing if prosecution proceeds anyway. Prosecutors look more favorably on defendants who come forward then those who had to be hunted down.

But heres what most attorneys wont tell you about pre-indictment intervention: it carries risks. You might draw attention to yourself that wouldnt have otherwise materialized. You might provide information in a proffer that gets used against you if negotiations fail. You might incriminate yourself without recieving anything in return. This is why you need an attorney who understands exactley how Northern District of Texas prosecutors operate.

What Actually Happens If Your Charged

OK so lets walk through what actualy happens if your charged with PPP fraud in the Northern District of Texas. Not the theoretical version. The reality.

First, you get arrested or you self-surrender on a warrant. Either way, you go through processing at the federal courthouse in Fort Worth or Dallas depending on where your case is filed. You get fingerprinted, photographed, and held untill your initial appearance before a magistrate judge.

Second, bail. In most PPP fraud cases, defendants are released on conditions. But those conditions can be restrictive. Travel limitations. Passport surrender. Financial reporting requirements. Sometimes home detention or GPS monitoring. If you have significant assets or connections outside the country, the government might argue your a flight risk. Texas defendants with international business ties face particularley close scrutiny.

Third, discovery. The government produces the evidence against you. In PPP cases, this usualy includes your loan application, bank records, tax returns, and any communications related to the application. Reviewing this evidence is how you understand exactley what theyre alleging and how strong their case actualy is.

Fourth, plea negotiations or trial preparation. The federal conviction rate is over 90%. Most cases end in guilty pleas. Trials are rare. Acquittals are rarer. The negotiation focuses on which charges you plead to and what sentencing recommendations the parties will make.

Fifth, sentencing. Federal sentencing follows the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Your sentence depends on the dollar amount involved, your role in the offense, your criminal history, wheather you accepted responsibility, and various other factors. Sentences in the Northern District have ranged from probation for the smallest cases to 7+ years for organized schemes.

At Spodek Law Group, weve handled federal cases across the country, including in the Northern District of Texas. We understand how these prosecutions unfold and what strategies actualy work. Call us at 212-300-5196 for a free consultation.

The Clock Is Running

The 10-year statute of limitations for bank fraud means the government has untill 2030 to prosecute loans taken in 2020. Untill 2031 for loans taken in 2021. Every month that passes, prosecutors work through more flagged applications. Every cooperating defendant provides more names. The investigation pipeline keeps moving forward.

Most defendants wait to act untill theyve recieved a target letter or been arrested. By then, most options have dissappeared. The time for pre-indictment intervention has passed. The cooperation window has closed. All thats left is damage control.

Heres the reality that should keep you up at night. Your PPP application has already been analyzed. If there were problems, your file is already flagged. The only question is wheather investigators have gotten to your case yet – and what you do before they do.

Why DFW Defendants Face Unique Risks

Heres something specific to Fort Worth and the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex that defendants elsewhere dont face. The DFW area has one of the largest concentrations of small businesses, construction companies, and oil and gas service companies in America. All of these industries applied heavily for PPP loans. And all of them are now under scrutiny.

The construction industry in Texas created thousands of PPP applications that are now being examined. Contractors, subcontractors, and construction companies applied for loans based on employee counts that sometimes didnt match their actual payroll records. The seasonal and project-based nature of construction work made it easy to inflate numbers. But the IRS has those real numbers, and prosecutors are using them.

The oil and gas industry created similar vulnerabilities. Service companies that worked the oil patch applied for PPP based on boom-time employment levels. But many had already laid off workers when oil prices crashed. The applications claimed employees who werent on payroll anymore. Prosecutors are treating those discrepencies as fraud.

If you inflated your employee count or payroll numbers on your PPP application, the government can prove it with documents you cant explain away. Your Texas Workforce Commission records show who you actualy employed. Your IRS filings show what you actualy paid them. The numbers either match or they dont. And if they dont, you have a federal fraud problem.

This is why so many DFW defendants are particularley vulnerable. The boom-and-bust nature of Texas industries meant many businesses had fluctuating employee counts. The temptation to use peak employment numbers rather than actual numbers led to thousands of applications that dont match the underlying documentation.

The Federal Sentencing Reality

Federal sentencing for PPP fraud follows the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which calculate recommended sentences based on several factors. The most important factor is the dollar amount involved. A $50,000 fraud produces a very different guideline range than a $500,000 fraud.

For fraud amounts under $40,000, the base offense level starts relatively low. But enhancements add up quickly. If you used sophisticated means – fake documents, multiple entities, identity theft – thats an enhancement. If you obstructed justice – lied to agents, destroyed evidence – thats another enhancement. If you were an organizer or leader of a scheme involving others, expect significantley more time.

The acceptance of responsibility reduction gives you three levels off your offense level, but only if you plead guilty early and dont waste the governments time preparing for trial. If you fight the case and lose, you get nothing. If you go to trial and get convicted, your facing the maximum guideline range.

Heres what this means in practical terms. A defendant who stole $200,000 through PPP fraud, used relatively simple methods, has no criminal history, and pleads guilty early might face 18-24 months. The same defendant who used sophisticated means, involved others, or fought the charges unsuccessfuly could face 36-60 months. Same dollar amount. Very different outcomes.

This is why having an experianced federal defense attorney matters so much. The difference between pleading to one charge versus another, the difference between getting acceptance of responsibility credit or not, the difference between arguing for a variance or not – these decisions determine wheather you serve 2 years or 5 years. Todd Spodek and the team at Spodek Law Group understand how to navigate these decisions. Call us before you make choices that cant be undone.

The investigation has already happened. Your loan has already been scrutinized. The evidence has already been preserved in federal databases. The only variable is what you do now. Call Spodek Law Group before the government calls you.