Free Consultations & We're Available 24/7
WE'RE A BOUTIQUE LAW FIRM.
TRUST 50 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE.
WE SERVICE CLIENTS NATIONWIDE.
Welcome to Spodek Law Group. If you’re reading this, something has already gone wrong – or you sense it’s about to. Maybe FINRA contacted you. Maybe your firm’s compliance department asked questions that felt different from the usual routine. Maybe you’re trying to understand what happens if this investigation goes sideways. Whatever brought you here, the standard explanations of FINRA bars and suspensions treat them as regulatory outcomes you can prepare for and manage. That’s not how any of this actually works.
The reality Todd Spodek has seen repeatedly in his practice is far more troubling: a FINRA bar isn’t a regulatory sanction. Courts have called it “the securities industry equivalent of capital punishment.” That’s a direct quote from federal court decisions. And unlike actual capital cases, you don’t get the protections of the criminal justice system. You don’t get “beyond reasonable doubt.” You don’t get a jury. You get FINRA’s process, FINRA’s rules, and FINRA’s decision about whether your career survives.
Most people assume that FINRA bars are reserved for the worst actors – the fraudsters, the Ponzi schemers, the brokers who steal client money. That’s the comforting story we tell ourselves. The data tells a different story entirely. More than one-third of people FINRA bars aren’t barred for fraud. They’re barred for Rule 8210 violations – for how they responded to an investigation, not for the underlying conduct being investigated. The process of investigation itself ends more careers than any specific category of actual misconduct.
Heres a number that should concern anyone in the securities industry: over the last two years, FINRA barred more than 730 people from the industry. Thats an average of one person every twenty-four hours losing there career permanantly. Not suspended. Not fined. Barred. Gone. The number is staggering when you actualy sit with it. Every day, somewhere, someones career in securities ends forever.
Before 2015, FINRA was imposing roughly 300 bars per year. The rate has fluctuated since then – dropping to an average of around 150 since 2020 according to some analyses. But heres the thing about those numbers that dosent get discussed: the rate may have dropped, but the consequenses havnt changed. A bar in 2024 destroys your career just as completley as a bar in 2014. The sanctions are the same. The disclosure is the same. The career death is the same.
In fiscal year 2024, FINRA settled approximately 523 disciplinary actions through Letters of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent – what the industry calls AWCs. About 70 percent were filed against individuals. The average fine was $362,547. The median fine was $125,000. These numbers sound managable until you understand that fines often come alongside bars. You dont just pay money. You pay money AND lose your ability to work in the industry. The fine is almost a afterthought compared to the career destruction.
One person every twenty-four hours is losing there career permanantly through FINRA bars. Thats not a statistic burried in a annual report. Thats the operating reality of securities regulation. And unlike criminal sentancing, theres no parole. Theres no early release for good behavior. Theres no time served that counts toward anything. When FINRA bars you, your barred until they decide otherwise – which, as we’ll discuss, almost never happens.
OK so heres were the system gets genuinley disturbing. Rule 8210 is FINRA’s information-gathering rule. It requires associated persons to provide information and documents to FINRA during investigations and to appear for on-the-record testimony when requested. Its a procedural rule about cooperation. Its not about fraud. Its not about stealing client money. Its not about unauthorized trading. Its about responding to requests.
Between 2020 and 2022, more brokers were barred from the securities industry for Rule 8210 violations then for any other single rule violation. Let that sink in for a moment. The most common reason for losing your career permanantly wasnt that you defrauded clients. It wasnt that you ran a Ponzi scheme. It wasnt that you made unsuitable recommendations that destroyed retirement accounts. The most common reason was that you didnt respond properly to FINRAs investigation.
A former FINRA Senior VP and Midwest Regional Director stated publicaly that “the most common reason for being barred was a failure to respond to an 8210 request.” This isnt speculation. This is someone who was inside the system describing how it actualy operates. The process of investigation ends more careers then the underlying conduct being investigated.
Think about what this means practicaly. FINRA opens an investigation. Maybe its about something you actualy did wrong. Maybe its about something that was a misunderstanding. Maybe its about something a disgruntled customer fabricated. It dosent matter – because if you fail to respond to the 8210 request, if you miss the deadline, if you dont appear for testimony, your barred. Not for whatever they were investigating. For the procedural violation. The investigation itself becomes the career-ending event, regardles of what triggered it.
Heres the part that makes defense attorneys lose sleep: FINRA will argue that most 8210 bars involve suspicions of serious underlying misconduct – fraud, conversion, egregious behavior. Thats probly true in many cases. But its unknowable from the public record becuase by the time someones barred for an 8210 violation, FINRA often hasnt actualy proven the underlying conduct. The bar happens before the facts come out. Your career ends based on your failure to participate, not on proven wrongdoing.
People confuse suspensions with bars. The words get used interchangably in casual conversation. They are not the same thing. The difference is the difference between a pause and an ending.
A suspension is temporary. It prevents you from acting in a registered capacity for a defined period – typicaly anywhere from ten business days to several months depending on the conduct. You can be suspended for failing to update your Form U4, for using unapproved communication channels, for executing unauthorized trades. The suspension ends. You return to work. Your career continues.
A bar is permanant. Its not a lengthy suspension. Its not a time-out. Its the end. FINRA Rule 8311 specifies that if your barred, no FINRA member firm can allow you to associate with it “in any capacity that is inconsistant with the sanction imposed.” This dosent just mean you cant be a broker. It means you cant work at a FINRA member firm in any capacity whatsoever – not as a trader, not as an advisor, not as an administrator, not even as a clerk.
The bar follows you in ways suspension dosent. BrokerCheck shows your disciplinary history to anyone who searches your name. A suspension eventualy becomes history. A bar is your permanant professional identity. Future employers in any finance-adjacent field will see it. Clients who google you will see it. The disclosure never goes away becuase the bar never goes away.
Heres the thing about suspensions that people misunderstand: there often a warning shot. FINRA suspends people for violations that, if repeated or escalated, could lead to a bar. A suspension is FINRA saying “we see you, and next time will be worse.” If your suspended and you continue the same conduct, or if you fail to address whatever triggered the suspension, a bar becomes much more likely. The suspension was your chance to correct course. The bar is what happens when you didnt.
Federal courts have called a FINRA bar “the securities industry equivalent of capital punishment.” That phrase appears in actual court decisions. Its not hyperbole from defense attorneys trying to win sympathy. Its how judges describe the severity of what were talking about.
But heres the paradox that makes the system genuinley troubling: if FINRA bars are capital punishment for securities careers, why dont barred individuals get capital-case protections? In a criminal capital case, the prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. You get a jury of your peers. You get extensive appellate review. You get multiple layers of protection against wrongful conviction becuase the stakes are ultimate.
FINRA proceedings use preponderance of the evidence – basically “more likely then not.” Your career can be permanantly destroyed based on FINRA proving that wrongdoing probly happened. Not that it definately happened. Not beyond reasonable doubt. Just more likely then not. Thats the standard for ending someones professional life forever.
You dont get a jury. FINRA disciplinary proceedings are heard by FINRA hearing panels. The people deciding your fate work within the FINRA system. There independent in theory. There also part of an organization that brought the charges against you. The structural dynamic is unavoidable: FINRA is both prosecutor and judge.
Think about what this means for the person facing a bar. The stakes are as high as they can be – permanant career destruction. The protections are lower then criminal courts provide. The decision-makers are part of the organization prosecuting you. And if you lose, you have 25 days to file an appeal notice. Miss that deadline and your appeal rights are gone completley. Twenty-five days to decide wether to spend years and hundreds of thousands of dollars fighting.
Lets talk about the appeal process, becuase this is were the system gets particularley perverse. If FINRA bars you, you have the right to appeal. That sounds like due process. That sounds like protection. The reality is something else entirely.
Your first appeal goes to the National Adjudicatory Council – the NAC. The NAC reviews initial decisions from FINRA hearing panels. Heres the thing about the NAC that most people dont understand until there already in the process: the NAC is part of FINRA. Your appealing a FINRA decision to FINRA. The organization that barred you is deciding wether they were wrong to bar you.
The NAC can affirm the bar – meaning it stands. The NAC can modify the bar – meaning maybe it becomes a suspension or maybe the conditions change. The NAC can reverse the bar – meaning you win. But heres what keeps defense attorneys up at night: the NAC can also increase sanctions. Your appeal can make things worse. You came in barred and you could leave with a bar plus additional fines, additional conditions, additional consequences. The appeal process itself is a risk.
If you lose at the NAC, you can appeal to the SEC. If you lose at the SEC, you can appeal to the federal courts. People have successfuly reversed FINRA bars at each of these levels. It happens. Its not impossible. But “success” in this context often means seven years of litigation. It means hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees. It means your career sitting frozen in limbo the entire time – you cant work while your bar is being appealed, but you also cant move on becuase the appeal hasnt resolved.
Heres another reality about appeals that nobody discusses openly: very few people actualy appeal. The statistics on appeal success rates are incomplete becuase most barred individuals never enter the appeal process. They dont have the resources. They dont have the years to spare. They dont have the stomach for fighting FINRA from within FINRA’s system. They accept the bar and try to build a different life. The appeal right exists. Using it is another matter.
Think about what happens during those years of appeals. Your barred, so you cant work in the industry. But your also fighting the bar, so your professional identity remains tied to securities. You cant fully transition to a new career becuase your still litigating the old one. You cant tell prospective employers “I used to work in securities” becuase the conversation immediatly becomes about the bar, the appeal, the uncertainty. Your stuck in professional limbo – not in the industry, not out of it, just waiting. Waiting for the NAC. Waiting for the SEC. Waiting for the courts. Waiting for your life to start again while years disappear.
A FINRA bar dosent just end your securities career. It radiates outward, destroying opportunities in directions you didnt anticipate.
The bar appears on your CRD record. Your CRD record is public through BrokerCheck. Anyone who searches your name – prospective employers, prospective clients, prospective business partners, reporters, competitors, anyone – can see that FINRA barred you. The disclosure dosent explain context. It dosent distinguish between someone barred for massive fraud and someone barred for missing an 8210 deadline. It just shows that you were barred.
State securities regulators see your FINRA bar. State insurance regulators see it. The Certified Financial Planner Board sees it. If you held a CFP designation, your bar affects that status. If you had state insurance licenses, your bar affects those licenses. Adjacent financial careers that you might have pursued instead – investment advisory without a FINRA member firm, insurance sales, financial planning – all become dramaticaly harder becuase the bar follows you across regulatory boundries.
Banks see it. If you were thinking of transitioning into banking, your FINRA bar appears on background checks. Private equity firms see it. Hedge funds that use FINRA member firms as prime brokers see it. The financial services industry is interconnected, and your bar radiates through every connection.
Heres what makes the radiation particularley cruel: employers in adjacent fields often wont take the risk. Even if your bar was for something technical – a paperwork failure, an 8210 issue, something that has nothing to do with fraud or client harm – the employer sees “FINRA BAR” and assumes the worst. They dont investigate the details. They dont want to explain to there board why they hired someone who was barred. They move on to the next candidate. The bar signals risk, and risk-averse institutions avoid risk.
The consequence cascade extends to relationships. Professional contacts who might have helped you transition to new opportunities distance themselves. Nobody wants to be associated with someone who was barred. The professional network you spent years building evaporates becuase people are afraid of the association. The colleagues who used to return your calls dont return them anymore. The mentors who used to provide guidance suddenly become unavailable. The bar dosent just end your career – it ends professional relationships that took decades to build.
Technicaly, FINRA bars are not absolutley permanant. The FINRA Rule 9520 Series establishes eligibility proceedings through which someone subject to statutory disqualification can apply to reenter the industry. This creates hope. That hope is almost always false.
Reentry requires finding a FINRA member firm willing to sponsor you. This firm must agree to supervise you under a detailed supervisory plan. The firm must be willing to associate itself with a barred individual – to tell FINRA “yes, we want this person despite there history.” Heres the reality: almost no firm is willing to do this. Firms worry about there own reputation. They worry about regulatory scrutiny. They worry about being labeled a “bad boy” firm for hiring barred individuals. The sponsorship you need to apply for reentry is almost impossible to obtain.
Even if you find a sponsor, FINRA’s eligibility proceedings require you to demonstrate “extraordinary circumstances” and “substantial evidence of behavioral reform.” This is a high bar – apropriately, given what were talking about. You must convince FINRA that the person they barred has fundamentaly changed and that allowing reentry serves the public interest. Most applicants fail. The statistics on successfull reentry are depressing.
Spodek Law Group has worked with individuals exploring every possible avenue after a bar. The harsh truth is that for most barred individuals, reentry is a fantasy that prevents them from moving on. The years spent pursuing reentry could have been spent building a new career outside securities. The resources spent on reentry applications could have been invested in new opportunities. Sometimes the kindest advice is the hardest to hear: the bar is permanant in practice even if not in theory.
This dosent mean you should give up without fighting. If FINRA is threatening a bar, the time to fight is before the bar happens – not after. Once your barred, the uphill battle becomes almost vertical. Before your barred, you have options. You have defenses. You have the ability to negotiate, to explain, to demonstrate why a bar is disproportionate. After your barred, all of that becomes exponentialy harder.
If your facing a FINRA investigation that could result in a bar, or if your already confronting bar proceedings, Spodek Law Group represents securities professionals who understand that surviving these situations requires more then legal competence – it requires understanding how the system actualy operates, not how its supposed to operate. Call us at 212-300-5196.
Very diligent, organized associates; got my case dismissed. Hard working attorneys who can put up with your anxiousness. I was accused of robbing a gemstone dealer. Definitely A law group that lays out all possible options and best alternative routes. Recommended for sure.
- ROBIN, GUN CHARGES ROBIN
NJ CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS