24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials

5

THE BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR.

The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation

Blog

Sentence Reduction Outcomes: Analyzing the Effects of Amendment 821 Retroactivity

March 21, 2024 Uncategorized

Sentence Reduction Outcomes: Analyzing the Effects of Amendment 821 Retroactivity

Hey there! I wanted to write this article to help explain the recent changes to federal sentencing guidelines under Amendment 821 and what it could mean for people currently incarcerated in federal prisons. This stuff can be really confusing, even for lawyers, so I’ll try to break it down in simple terms.

When the Commission changes the guidelines for how federal sentences get calculated, those changes are usually only for future cases. Making a change “retroactive” means it can apply to sentences that were already handed down under the old rules. So people who were sentenced before Amendment 821 took effect could now be eligible for lower sentences based on the new rules. Their cases can get re-opened for what’s called a “sentence reduction order.”

What Does Amendment 821 Do?

Amendment 821 makes a couple big changes to how criminal history points get calculated under the guidelines:

  • It gets rid of extra points for things like misdemeanor convictions or being on probation when the offense happened (called “status points”).
  • It creates a way for people with no criminal history points to get an additional 2-level reduction if their crime wasn’t violent or serious.

The idea is to only enhance sentences when someone has an actual pattern of repeat offenses. Status points and old convictions don’t necessarily mean someone is a career criminal.

Who Can Get a Sentence Reduction?

To get a reduction under the retroactive part of Amendment 821, you have to meet a few conditions:

  • You must have been sentenced before November 1, 2023 when the changes take effect.
  • Eliminating the status points you got has to lower your criminal history category.
  • If you have zero points, your crime can’t have involved violence, firearms, terrorism, or serious drug trafficking.

The court also has to consider factors like public safety, your post-sentencing conduct, and how much of your term you’ve already served. So even if you’re eligible, a judge may or may not grant a reduction.

What’s the Process for Getting a Sentence Reduction?

The February 2024 effective date means federal inmates will soon be able to petition courts for resentencing under Amendment 821. However, there’s still some uncertainty around how exactly it will work.

Based on other retroactive changes, we can expect a few key steps:

  1. The Bureau of Prisons will identify people eligible and notify them.
  2. You’ll have to file a motion asking the sentencing judge to reduce your term.
  3. The judge can hold a hearing before deciding whether to grant the reduction.
  4. If granted, the judge will issue an order lowering your sentence.

To have the best chance, it’s important to show how you’ve used your time productively and plan to continue that progress after release. Documenting your rehabilitation efforts through programs, jobs, education, etc. makes a difference.

What Are the Main Arguments Around This Change?

There’s been a lot of debate on whether Amendment 821 should apply retroactively. Here are some key points:

  • Pros: Fixes unfair sentences, saves taxpayer money, helps reduce overcrowding and racial disparities in prisons.
  • Cons: Early release jeopardizes public safety, undermines severity of offenses, burdens courts with petitions.

Conservative organizations like FreedomWorks opposed retroactivity, arguing it amounted to early release for dangerous criminals. Some members of Congress introduced bills to block the amendment, but none gained traction.

Prosecutors’ views were split, with some expressing public safety concerns while others welcomed recalibrating outdated guidelines. Many federal judges support the change. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor previously indicated too many people get excessive sentences due to flawed criminal history scoring.

What Does This Mean for Inmates and Their Families?

For inmates who meet the criteria, Amendment 821 retroactivity offers real hope of getting a second chance months or years sooner. The average reduction is estimated to be around 15 months. That’s huge for people at the end of long sentences.

The change also gives many families hope of reuniting with loved ones sooner. Groups like Families Against Mandatory Minimums say rebalancing sentences will help restore trust and fairness in the system.

That said, retroactivity isn’t a guarantee. Inmates will have to take action to petition the courts once the February 2024 effective date hits. There may be a flood of requests initially, so patience and persistence will be key.

Looking Ahead

While Amendment 821 retroactivity represents an important step forward, more reforms are still needed to create an effective and humane criminal justice system. Some ideas gaining support include:

  • Expanding diversion programs and alternatives to incarceration.
  • Increasing access to rehabilitation services for inmates.
  • Removing barriers to re-entry and employment after release.
  • Re-evaluating mandatory minimums and sentencing disparities.

What matters most is that sentences accurately reflect both the offense and offender. Inflexible rules often lead to excessive punishment. With Amendment 821, we’re starting to see a shift towards more nuanced, thoughtful policymaking. But there’s a lot of work left to do.

I know this was a lot of info! Let me know if you have any other questions. Wishing the best to all those impacted by these changes.

References

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile

RALPH P. FRANCHO, JR

Associate

view profile

JEREMY FEIGENBAUM

Associate Attorney

view profile

ELIZABETH GARVEY

Associate

view profile

CLAIRE BANKS

Associate

view profile

RAJESH BARUA

Of-Counsel

view profile

CHAD LEWIN

Of-Counsel

view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now