Blog
Ohio Child Pornography Defense Lawyers
Contents
The Complex History and Uncertain Future of Federal Child Pornography Sentencing
Child pornography is undoubtedly a serious crime that causes significant harm. However, federal sentencing guidelines for non-production child pornography offenses have become increasingly severe over time, often driven more by emotional reactions and political pressures rather than empirical evidence. This has resulted in confusion, inconsistencies, and unduly harsh punishments that many argue are disproportionate to the culpability of offenders. Reforming these flawed guidelines will require nuanced conversations and a willingness to analyze tough issues objectively.
The Origins of Harsh Sentencing Enhancements
In the early 2000s, changes were made to the federal sentencing guidelines for child pornography offenses, increasing the recommended penalties. According to analysis from federal public defender Troy Stabenow, these reforms were not motivated by careful research, but rather by a perception that the existing guidelines were too lenient. There was a sense that viewers of child pornography posed an underappreciated risk of committing contact sex offenses against children, although the empirical support for this belief was questionable.Media stories also stoked public fears, like NBC’s “To Catch a Predator” series, which depicted child sex stings. This led to political pressures to “get tough” on child pornography crimes. The PROTECT Act of 2003 directly instructed the United States Sentencing Commission to increase penalties. The Commission complied by adding more sentencing enhancements related to the number and type of images possessed.
The Resulting Flaws in the Child Pornography Guidelines
Over time, the child pornography sentencing guidelines became increasingly disconnected from principles of sound policymaking. According to an analysis from the Sentencing Commission itself, the scheme does not adequately distinguish between offenders based on danger or culpability. The enhancements meant to target the most egregious crimes often apply broadly, regardless of actual harm.For example, an offender can receive a two-level enhancement for images depicting sadistic conduct, which sounds reasonable. But this enhancement applies whenever any image depicts this content, even if it is a small portion of a large collection. The enhancement related to the number of images has also led to confusion and inconsistencies. Prosecutors have incredible discretion in deciding what constitutes the “total number” of images.There are also enhancements that feel disconnected from culpability, like those related merely to the type of technology used in the offense. Ultimately, the sentencing ranges recommended by the guidelines frequently lack credibility among judges. Data shows federal judges are varying from the guidelines in about 70 percent of child pornography cases.
The Need for More Nuanced Reform Conversations
There seems to be growing recognition that reforming child pornography sentencing laws is needed. Some proposed legislation focuses narrowly on giving judges more discretion to depart from guidelines in individual cases. However, broader reforms likely require a willingness to dive deeper into the complex social and ethical issues surrounding child pornography crimes.For example, what does appropriate punishment look like for those who possess abusive images but have not directly abused children themselves? To what extent does viewing child pornography actually correlate with or predict contact offenses? How do we weigh factors like a defendant‘s likelihood of recidivism versus their potential for rehabilitation? Reasonable people can disagree in good faith on these difficult questions.Creating sentencing schemes that are fair, consistent, and proportionate requires analyzing the empirical research and having open discussions about the ethical principles at stake. This dialogue needs to happen not just among judges and policymakers, but also among the general public.
The Complications Around Recidivism and Risk Assessment
Proponents of harsh sentencing often argue these punishments are necessary because those who possess child pornography pose a high risk to public safety if they reoffend. However, the recidivism data on this population is complex and incomplete.A 2021 report from the Sentencing Commission provides one of the only detailed federal recidivism studies of child pornography offenders. It found that 7.4% were rearrested for a sex offense within five years. This includes those re-arrested for child pornography possession as well as contact sex crimes.The report has limitations – it only tracks arrests, not convictions, and only includes those released from prison, not those who received probation. But it provides some of the best current data. Some analysis suggests these numbers are fairly low compared to other offense types. However, others argue that even a small number of reoffenses is troubling given the serious harm of sex crimes.
There are also important ethical issues around using risk assessment tools to determine sentences. Statistical models can predict behavior generally, but cannot determine what any specific individual might do. Civil liberties groups have raised concerns about relying too heavily on recidivism predictions in sentencing decisions. But policymakers also have a duty to protect public safety when possible.There are good arguments on multiple sides of these issues. But finding solutions requires moving past political rhetoric and having evidence-based debates on the merits of different policy proposals.