Blog
How does asset forfeiture relate to money laundering charges?
Asset forfeiture is a legal process that allows law enforcement to seize assets, like cash or property, that are connected to criminal activity. It’s a powerful tool used in conjunction with money laundering charges. But how exactly does asset forfeiture work with money laundering cases? Let’s break it down.
Contents
What is Asset Forfeiture?
Asset forfeiture allows police and prosecutors to take possession of assets linked to criminal activity through civil or criminal procedures. There are a few types of asset forfeiture:
- Civil asset forfeiture – Police can seize assets without charging someone with a crime if they believe the assets are tied to illegal activity. The owner must file a claim on the assets, essentially forcing them to prove the assets are “innocent.”
- Criminal forfeiture – Assets can be seized after someone is convicted of a crime. The assets are part of the criminal sentence.
- Administrative forfeiture – Assets worth less than $500,000 can be seized administratively by law enforcement without judicial oversight.
The idea behind asset forfeiture is to disrupt criminal enterprises by taking away tools and proceeds of crime. Forfeited assets either go back to victims or into law enforcement budgets.
Asset Forfeiture in Money Laundering Cases
Money laundering involves concealing the source of illegally obtained money to make it appear legitimate. It allows criminals to enjoy profits from illegal activities.Asset forfeiture is a natural partner to money laundering charges. Seizing assets helps take away the incentives for laundering money in the first place.Prosecutors often pursue both money laundering charges and asset forfeiture in these types of cases. The assets seized are usually things like:
- Cash from drug sales or other crimes
- Bank accounts where laundered money is kept
- Businesses used to commingle legal and illegal money
- Real estate purchased with laundered funds
- Vehicles, boats, jewelry, etc. bought with dirty money
To get a conviction on money laundering charges, prosecutors must prove the money came from specified criminal activity, like drug trafficking, fraud, or organized crime.Asset forfeiture relies on similar evidence. The government has to establish a link between the seized assets and criminal activity. This nexus is easier to prove if someone is convicted of money laundering.
How Forfeiture Relates to the Charges
There are a few ways asset forfeiture complements money laundering charges:
Follows the Money Trail
Following the money trail is key in prosecuting money laundering and understanding the web of criminal activity. Asset forfeiture helps “follow the money” by seizing assets along the way.Investigators can track assets as they move through bank accounts, businesses, real estate, etc. Asset forfeiture disrupts the money flow at key chokepoints.
Deprives Criminals of Illicit Profits
In addition to prison time, forfeiture deprives criminals of their illicit profits. This helps eliminate incentives for illegal activity.Letting criminals keep profits from crime even after convictions undermines deterrence. Forfeiture allows prosecutors to “take the profit out of crime.”
Develops Evidence for Charges
Evidence gathered for forfeiture proceedings often supports criminal charges as well. Records tracing assets can help prove the underlying criminal activity.This evidence can establish probable cause for charging money laundering and trigger criminal forfeiture upon conviction.
Expands Tools for Prosecution
Prosecutors have more tools at their disposal with both criminal charges and civil asset forfeiture. Not all cases neatly fit into either category.For instance, civil forfeiture can target assets linked to money laundering without meeting the criminal burden of proof. And criminal charges allow forfeiture through sentencing.Having both options expands prosecutors’ ability to disrupt criminal enterprises and take away incentives.
Forfeiture Rules and Limits
Of course, there have to be rules and limits on asset forfeiture to protect civil liberties and property rights. A few key principles:
- There must be a substantial connection between the assets and criminal activity. Assets only remotely linked to money laundering cannot be seized.
- Forfeiture should be proportional to the offense. Seizing a car for a minor drug crime would likely be excessive.
- Seizure practices must balance law enforcement needs with due process rights. Critics argue civil forfeiture lacks sufficient protections for property owners.
- Forfeiture should not be solely about funding law enforcement budgets. Generating revenue must be secondary to public safety.
Conclusion
Asset forfeiture and money laundering charges go hand-in-hand. Forfeiture follows the money trail, deprives criminals of profits, gathers evidence, and expands prosecution tools. But there must be limits on government seizure power to protect civil liberties. When applied responsibly, asset forfeiture can bolster anti-money laundering efforts. But as a far-reaching law enforcement tool, it requires oversight and reform to prevent abuse.
Resources
Videos
Articles
- Tainted Cash or Easy Money? Exploring Civil Asset Forfeiture
- Asset Forfeiture Abuse
- Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering: Taking the Profit Out of Crime