Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Being served with a federal subpoena for police misconduct records can be an intimidating and concerning experience. As a police department or municipality, you have an obligation to cooperate, but you also need to protect sensitive information and the rights of your officers. This article provides an overview of federal subpoenas, what they entail, available defenses to fight or limit them, and steps to take if you receive one.
A federal subpoena is a written order requiring you to provide documents, records, testimony or physical evidence relevant to a federal criminal investigation or trial. They are issued under the authority of the court.Subpoenas can request a wide range of records related to police misconduct allegations, including:
Failure to comply can result in civil or criminal contempt of court charges. However, there are certain defenses available.
While federal subpoenas carry serious weight, there are defenses available to fight or limit them:
While these defenses can limit disclosure in some cases, courts tend to favor enforcement if relevance to the case is clear.
If your department receives a federal subpoena for police misconduct records, here are important steps to take:
Having an action plan prepared can help you appropriately respond while protecting sensitive records.
Working with an attorney experienced with federal subpoenas is highly recommended. They can:
Getting expert legal advice can give you the best chance of protecting sensitive records and limiting disclosure.
There have been many cases where police departments have successfully fought against overbroad federal subpoenas requesting misconduct records:In U.S. v. City of New York, the NYPD challenged a subpoena requesting all civil lawsuit documentation against officers over a 5-year period. They argued it was too burdensome and irrelevant. The court limited the scope to documents directly related to the civil rights claim.The Seattle Police Department fought a request for 15 years worth of records related to police violence during protests. Again citing overbreadth, the court narrowed the subpoena to use of force reports occurring within a 1-month timeframe.These cases demonstrate that while challenging federal subpoenas is difficult, the right legal strategy can help limit disclosure.
Receiving a federal subpoena for police misconduct records or investigative materials is serious business. While departments have an obligation to cooperate, several defenses allow fighting overbroad or unduly burdensome requests. Working closely with legal counsel, narrowing the scope where possible, and appropriately redacting protected information is key to balancing disclosure and confidentiality when responding. With the right strategy, departments can produce required materials while preventing unnecessary invasion of sensitive records and personnel privacy.
Overview of federal subpoenas: https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladviceofftopic/comments/f1x14t/how_do_federal_subpoenas_work/Types of records requested: https://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/what-is-a-federal-subpoenaSubpoena defenses: https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-defenses-one-can-raise-to-resist-a-federal-subpoenaAttorney assistance: https://www.findlaw.com/litigation/legal-system/responding-to-a-subpoena-request.htmlU.S. v. City of New York:
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2008mc00347/321396/39/Seattle Police Department subpoena challenge:
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.