24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials

5

THE BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR.

The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation

Blog

Disclosing OFAC Issues During Deals and Transactions

March 21, 2024 Uncategorized

When companies are considering mergers, acquisitions, investments, joint ventures, exports, financing transactions, or other business deals, it’s important to conduct thorough due diligence to uncover any sanctions-related issues. Failure to identify and address Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) compliance problems prior to closing a deal can lead to significant legal risks and penalties down the road.

OFAC administers U.S. economic sanctions programs and maintains lists of sanctioned individuals, entities, and countries. U.S. persons, including companies subject to OFAC jurisdiction, are prohibited from conducting unauthorized transactions or dealings with sanctioned parties. This means U.S. companies need to screen their business partners, vendors, customers, and transactions to ensure they don’t inadvertently violate OFAC regulations.

While OFAC due diligence is standard practice for U.S. companies, many deals end up running into OFAC compliance problems that weren’t caught during the initial review process. This article will examine common pitfalls in OFAC due diligence, best practices for identifying and remediating OFAC issues pre-closing, and options for voluntary self-disclosure when violations are discovered post-closing.

Common Pitfalls in OFAC Due Diligence

When evaluating a potential deal or transaction, there are several areas where inadequate OFAC due diligence frequently occurs:

  • Not screening all relevant parties – Failure to conduct OFAC searches on all entities involved, including subsidiaries, parents, affiliates, partners, key executives, board members, major shareholders, etc.
  • Focusing only on the target company – Conducting OFAC diligence only on the target asset or entity being acquired, rather than all involved parties.
  • Failing to identify hidden owners – Not uncovering concealed beneficial owners who may be sanctioned parties.
  • Not checking for blocked property – Neglecting to identify whether the target company has any property or interests subject to OFAC blocking requirements.
  • No post-signing verification – Not re-screening for OFAC issues between signing and closing to catch any new designations or compliance problems.

While these examples reflect common missteps, there are many other potential gaps that can lead to OFAC violations if not properly addressed before completing a transaction.

Conducting Comprehensive OFAC Diligence

To avoid overlooking OFAC concerns, companies need to take a rigorous, systematic approach when evaluating deals. Here are some best practices for OFAC due diligence:

  • Develop a detailed OFAC screening procedure and checklist.
  • Screen all parties involved in the transaction, including entities, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, partners, key executives, major shareholders, board members, etc. Cast a wide net.
  • Verify identities through government IDs, passports, or other documentation.
  • Research names, addresses, jurisdictions, relationships, and background information for red flags.
  • Run all names through OFAC’s Search Tool and other sanctions lists.
  • Conduct negative news searches to identify any problematic activities, relationships, or allegations involving the parties.
  • Review transaction history and client lists for any high-risk patterns.
  • Perform due diligence at multiple stages – before signing agreements, before closing deal, right before finalizing transaction.
  • Ask partners to certify they have conducted OFAC searches and not identified any prohibited parties or transactions.
  • Include OFAC representations and warranties in transaction documents.
  • Maintain detailed documentation of all OFAC due diligence efforts.

This level of scrutiny requires significant time and resources. However, it’s essential for properly identifying potential OFAC issues, allowing them to be addressed upfront rather than unexpectedly surfacing down the road.

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
2024-03-21
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
2024-03-18
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
2024-03-18
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
2024-03-15
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
2024-03-15
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
2024-03-12
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
2024-03-12
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
2024-02-28
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
2024-02-24
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

Remediation Options for OFAC Concerns

When OFAC diligence uncovers sanctions-related issues prior to closing a deal, companies have several options to consider:

  • Obtain an OFAC license – Apply for a specific license from OFAC to authorize the transaction if it involves a sanctioned party or prohibited activity.
  • Remove problem parties – If beneficial owners, key executives, or other non-essential parties raise OFAC concerns, remove them from the deal.
  • Isolate entity/assets – Separate and exclude any subsidiaries, assets, or operations that are linked to OFAC issues.
  • Unwind/terminate deal – If OFAC concerns are pervasive and unresolvable, unwind the transaction pre-closing.
  • Delay closing – Postpone finalizing deal until OFAC problems can be addressed and resolved.

The appropriate remediation plan will depend on the specific circumstances. In some cases, relatively simple steps like removing a concerning party from the transaction or divesting a small subsidiary may be sufficient. However, if sanctions issues are extensive, terminating the deal altogether prior to closing may be the best option to avoid future OFAC violations.

Self-Disclosure of Post-Closing OFAC Violations

If improper or inadequate due diligence results in OFAC issues being discovered after a deal has closed, companies must evaluate whether to make a voluntary self-disclosure to OFAC. Potential sanctions violations can be self-reported using OFAC’s online form.

According to OFAC’s Enforcement Guidelines, voluntary self-disclosure is considered a mitigating factor that may reduce potential penalties. However, the decision whether to self-disclose is complex:

  • Weigh potential penalty reduction against legal costs of internal investigation required for disclosure.
  • Consider likelihood of OFAC uncovering the violation independently.
  • Assess damage to reputation and share price from public disclosure.
  • Determine whether disclosure will lead to additional scrutiny and consequences from OFAC or other agencies.
  • Evaluate ability to remediate or exit problematic activities and partners to prevent future violations.

Recent OFAC enforcements indicate that companies allowing violations to continue after closing often receive harsher penalties compared to those who voluntarily self-disclose and take corrective actions. However, the incentives around disclosure can be ambiguous. Engaging legal counsel to perform a detailed risk assessment is key.

OFAC Penalties and Enforcement Actions

Under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, civil penalties for OFAC violations can reach up to $302,584 per violation, with each prohibited transaction counting as a separate violation. Criminal penalties can also apply in certain cases, with fines up to $1 million and up to 20 years imprisonment for willful violations.

In recent years, OFAC has aggressively pursued enforcement actions related to sanctions violations uncovered during mergers, acquisitions, and other deals:

  • In 2019, OFAC reached a $8.3 million settlement with Cobham Holdings for acquiring a company with ongoing business in sanctioned jurisdictions which continued post-acquisition.
  • In 2014, OFAC penalized Zimmer Biomet Holdings $6.5 million for importing dental implants from a distributor partially owned by a sanctioned Cuban company.
  • In 2010, OFAC imposed a $2 million penalty against Natco Group for sales of petrochemical equipment to a distributor with ties to an Iranian company.

These cases illustrate OFAC’s willingness to hand down substantial fines even when violations arise indirectly through a counterparty’s misconduct rather than a company’s own active sanctions evasion. Thorough due diligence and remediation efforts are essential.

Mitigating OFAC Compliance Risks in Deals

With proper precautions, companies can significantly reduce the likelihood of encountering OFAC issues on transactions:

  • Develop and follow detailed OFAC screening procedures.
  • Conduct extensive due diligence on all parties associated with the deal.
  • Continuously re-screen for new OFAC designations prior to closing.
  • Review transaction history for any high-risk patterns.
  • Isolate any sanctioned subsidiaries or partners.
  • Obtain OFAC licenses where required.
  • Include OFAC representations in deal documents.
  • Consult legal counsel when issues arise to assess disclosure risks.

Uncovering and resolving OFAC problems proactively, before completing transactions, is the best way companies can avoid becoming subject to OFAC enforcement actions and penalties down the road.

 

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile

RALPH P. FRANCHO, JR

Associate

view profile

JEREMY FEIGENBAUM

Associate Attorney

view profile

ELIZABETH GARVEY

Associate

view profile

CLAIRE BANKS

Associate

view profile

RAJESH BARUA

Of-Counsel

view profile

CHAD LEWIN

Of-Counsel

view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now