Service Oriented Law Firm
WE'RE A BOUTIQUE LAW FIRM.
Over 50 Years Experience
TRUST 50 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE.
Multiple Offices
WE SERVICE CLIENTS NATIONWIDE.
WE'RE A BOUTIQUE LAW FIRM.
TRUST 50 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE.
WE SERVICE CLIENTS NATIONWIDE.







When someone is arrested in New York, a judge can decide to release them before their trial under certain conditions known as “bail.” Bail is basically a promise that the defendant will return to court when they are supposed to. If they don’t show up, they lose their bail money. There are a bunch of different types of bail and conditions which can be set – let’s break it down:
This is probably what most people think of when they hear “bail.” The judge sets a dollar amount, and the defendant has to pay that amount to get out of jail. If they show up to court, they get the money back at the end of the case. If they miss court, they lose the money. Cash bail is basically like a security deposit you put down to make sure you don’t skip town.
Cash bail is controversial. Due to it means poor people often get stuck in jail pretrial while rich people can just buy their way out. That’s why New York reformed its bail laws in 2019 to reduce cash bail for minor crimes. More on that later!
With a bond, the defendant doesn’t have to put up the full bail amount. Instead they pay a bail bondsman a percentage – usually around 10% – and the bondsman puts up the full amount. At the end of the case, the bondsman gets the full bail amount back from the court and keeps the percentage the defendant paid. If the defendant misses court, the bondsman is on the hook for the full bail amount.
One common type of bond is a surety bond – that’s when the bail bondsman is backed by an insurance company. Bail bondsman have to be licensed by the state.
This is kind of a hybrid of cash bail and bond. The defendant puts up part of the full bail amount themselves as a cash deposit. Then they pay a bail bondsman a percentage fee to put up the rest. It’s kind of like putting 20% down on a house, and getting a mortgage for the rest.
With an unsecured bond, the defendant doesn’t have to put up any money or collateral. They just sign a promise that they’ll pay the full bail amount if they miss court. The judge has to trust them at their word – hence “unsecured.”
Instead of bail, a judge can release someone with non-monetary conditions. Like:
Electronic monitoring (ankle bracelet). Curfew. Drug testing. Mandatory check-ins. Travel restrictions. Staying in a halfway house.
These allow the court to keep tabs on the defendant without locking them up or making them pay money.
Judges can also just release defendants with no bail and no conditions. This is called ROR or release on own recognizance. The judge trusts the defendant to come back to court voluntarily.
In 2019, New York State passed a law reforming its bail system. The big change was eliminating cash bail for most misdemeanors and non-violent felonies. Now judges can’t set cash bail for those minor crimes – they have to use non-monetary conditions instead.
The idea was to keep poor people from getting stuck in jail for small-time offenses just because they’re poor. But some people has argued the reform went too far. And New York has rolled back parts of it since.
The 2019 bail reform eliminated cash bail for nearly all misdemeanor, and non-violent felony charges. This means judges is required to release defendants on the least restrictive conditions necessary. The law also required faster discovery sharing, and set time limits for trial readiness.
Critics argued that this led to an increase in crime. Due to dangerous individuals being released without bail. Supporters pointed out that the reforms reduced pretrial detention for people who hadn’t been convicted of anything.
Bail reform debates tend to boil down to a tradeoff between public safety and civil liberties. When someone is accused but not convicted of a crime, do we treat them like they’re innocent until proven guilty? Or do we lock them up if we think they could be dangerous?
Opponents of reform say judges should consider public safety when setting bail. But reformers argue that goes against the presumption of innocence – we can’t punish people preemptively before they’re convicted.
There are good-faith arguments on both sides. Perhaps judges could be given more discretion to weigh public safety in some cases. While still reducing excessive pretrial detention overall?
Bail reform is still evolving in New York and it remains controversial. The debate will likely continue playing out in the state legislature for years to come. Both sides make important points about balancing public safety, racial justice, and civil liberties.
There are also ideas out there like abolishing cash bail altogether, using risk assessment tools to help judges, or having more robust pretrial services to monitor defendants in the community. Lots of options on the table!
Various reforms has been proposed to address concerns about the current bail system. Including:
Risk assessment tools which help judges determine which defendants pose a flight risk or danger to the community. Pretrial services programs that provide supervision, and support for defendants released before trial. Expanded use of non-monetary conditions instead of cash bail. And greater judicial discretion to consider public safety factors in certain cases.
At the end of the day, the bail system involves incredibly high stakes. People’s lives can be ruined by even a few days in jail pretrial. But crime victims also deserves consideration. There are no easy answers. Which is why thoughtful reform is so important but so difficult.
Pretrial detention can have devastating consequences which extends far beyond the immediate loss of freedom. People who is held in jail before trial often:
Lose their jobs, and income. Face eviction from their homes. Lose custody of their children. Are more likely to plead guilty even if they’re innocent. Due to the pressure to get out of jail. Experience mental health crises. And face difficulty rebuilding their lives even after acquittal.
These consequences is particularly harsh for people who was later found not guilty or has charges dismissed.
If you or a loved one has been arrested in New York, having an experienced attorney at your bail hearing is critical. A skilled lawyer can:
Present evidence of your ties to the community. Demonstrate that you’re not a flight risk. Challenge the prosecution’s arguments for high bail or detention. Propose appropriate non-monetary conditions. And advocate for your release on recognizance.
The bail decision can determine whether you spend weeks or months in jail before trial. Or whether you’re able to return home to your family, and job while preparing your defense. Don’t try and navigate this alone.
If you’re facing criminal charges in New York and need help with a bail hearing or bail review, contact Spodek Law Group immediately. We has extensive experience arguing for favorable bail conditions, and securing the release of our clients.
Don’t let yourself or a loved one sit in jail due to excessive bail. Let our experienced criminal defense team fight for your release. We understand New York’s bail laws, and we know how to present compelling arguments to judges. Call us 24/7 for immediate assistance. Your freedom is too important to wait.

Very diligent, organized associates; got my case dismissed. Hard working attorneys who can put up with your anxiousness. I was accused of robbing a gemstone dealer. Definitely A law group that lays out all possible options and best alternative routes. Recommended for sure.
- ROBIN, GUN CHARGES ROBIN
NJ CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS