Your New Jersey Criminal Defense Lawyers The Spodek Law Group is an elite law…
Service Oriented Law Firm
WE'RE A BOUTIQUE LAW FIRM.
Over 50 Years Experience
TRUST 50 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE.
Multiple Offices
WE SERVICE CLIENTS NATIONWIDE.
WE'RE A BOUTIQUE LAW FIRM.
TRUST 50 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE.
WE SERVICE CLIENTS NATIONWIDE.







Stark Law contains a set of U.S. federal laws, with a focus on healthcare abuse and fraud. The law prohibits doctors from referring patients to a specific health care provider that is paid for by Medicare if they have a financial arrangement or will otherwise benefit financially. Given the potential broad interpretation of a financial arrangement, the government has actually defined it as the referring physician having either a direct or indirect investment interest or ownership. This interpretation includes any of the physician’s family members.
Since Stark Law isn’t a criminal statute, there are several agencies that can pursue civil action if it’s violated. This is something that is generally pursued by Health and Human Services through the Inspector General and can result in thousands of dollars in monetary penalties for each one of the services billed to Medicare. There are other penalties associated with this violation that could potentially triple the penalty.
Stark Law contains a set of U.S. federal laws, with a focus on healthcare abuse and fraud. The law prohibits doctors from referring patients to a specific health care provider that is paid for by Medicare if they have a financial arrangement or will otherwise benefit financially. Given the potential broad interpretation of a financial arrangement, the government has actually defined it as the referring physician having either a direct or indirect investment interest or ownership. This interpretation includes any of the physician’s family members.
| Type of Financial Arrangement | Definition |
|---|---|
| Direct Investment Interest | Physician has direct ownership or investment in the healthcare provider |
| Indirect Investment Interest | Physician has indirect ownership through another entity or arrangement |
| Ownership Interest | Any form of equity or ownership stake in the healthcare provider |
| Family Member Interests | Financial arrangements held by physician’s immediate family members |
When a claim is brought against a physician for violating Stark Law, the practitioner’s attorney will generally have to defend them against Medicare, Medicaid, the Inspector General, and the Department of Justice. The charge is that the physician violated Stark Law, when intentional or unintentional.
Since Stark Law isn’t a criminal statute, there are several agencies that can pursue civil action if it’s violated. This is something that is generally pursued by Health and Human Services through the Inspector General and can result in thousands of dollars in monetary penalties for each one of the services billed to Medicare. There are other penalties associated with this violation that could potentially triple the penalty.
| Agency | Role in Stark Law Enforcement |
|---|---|
| Health and Human Services (HHS) | Primary agency pursuing civil action for Stark Law violations |
| Inspector General (OIG) | Investigates violations and assesses penalties |
| Medicare | Federal health insurance program affected by prohibited referrals |
| Medicaid | State and federal program affected by prohibited referrals |
| Department of Justice (DOJ) | Pursues civil action and coordinates with other agencies |
What’s tricky about Stark Law is that there is no requirement to prove that the physician intended to violate the law. This is because it’s a strict liability statute. In other words, a physician that made prohibited referrals and did so accidentally, can be found responsible for breaking the law. This means a physician can unknowingly break Stark Law and be subject to steep penalties. It’s worth noting that practitioners who violate the law with intent are subject to greater penalties.
| Violation Type | Intent Required? | Penalties |
|---|---|---|
| Unintentional Violation | NO – Intent not required for liability | Thousands of dollars per service billed to Medicare; potential treble damages |
| Intentional Violation | Intent proven | Greater penalties beyond standard strict liability penalties |
CRITICAL: A physician can unknowingly break Stark Law and be subject to steep penalties. This is because it’s a strict liability statute – the government does NOT have to prove intent.
Fortunately, there are Stark Law exceptions that offer a limited capacity in which a physician can refer patients to designated health services that are federally funded. For instance, they can make a referral for radiology or laboratory services. This often occurs when a physician is part of a medical group that offers these services. Another example is when there is a compensation agreement in writing that spells out what’s involved. This agreement should also satisfy the Anti-Kickback Statute. These are just two examples of multiple exceptions that an attorney would consider when defending a client accused of violating Stark Law.
| Exception | Description | Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| In-Office Ancillary Services | Referrals for radiology or laboratory services | Physician must be part of medical group that offers these services |
| Written Compensation Agreement | Formal written agreement spelling out compensation arrangement | Agreement must also satisfy the Anti-Kickback Statute |
| Other Exceptions | Multiple additional exceptions exist | Attorney can evaluate which exceptions apply to your situation |
These are just two examples of multiple exceptions that an attorney would consider when defending a client accused of violating Stark Law.
Enforcement of Stark Law can be severe. In fact, there have been cases of medical centers paying more than $80 million in penalties for violating the law. Specifically, there were instances of physicians having payment arrangements that clearly violated Stark Law. The severity of the penalties is one of many reasons why practitioners should consult with legal counsel concerning internal processes and practices.
Since Stark Law isn’t a criminal statute, there are several agencies that can pursue civil action if it’s violated. This is something that is generally pursued by Health and Human Services through the Inspector General and can result in thousands of dollars in monetary penalties for each one of the services billed to Medicare. There are other penalties associated with this violation that could potentially triple the penalty.
| Penalty Type | Amount/Description |
|---|---|
| Base Penalty | Thousands of dollars for each service billed to Medicare |
| Treble Damages | Penalties can potentially be tripled |
| Civil Monetary Penalties | Assessed by OIG for each violation |
| Enhanced Penalties for Intent | Practitioners who violate law with intent subject to greater penalties |
| Major Cases | Medical centers have paid $80+ million in penalties |
Enforcement of Stark Law can be severe. In fact, there have been cases of medical centers paying more than $80 million in penalties for violating the law. Specifically, there were instances of physicians having payment arrangements that clearly violated Stark Law.
Many physicians choose a proactive approach to ensuring compliance with Stark Law by having legal counsel review referral practices and provide training to practitioners. This approach is beneficial for many reasons, but it’s practical because penalties can be assessed even when the violation was an innocent mistake. It’s important for physicians to retain legal counsel that has experience actually responding to investigations conducted by the Department of Health and Human Service. It’s also prudent to secure counsel that has experience dealing with the Inspector General.
| Strategy | Why It’s Important |
|---|---|
| Legal Counsel Review | Have attorney review all referral practices |
| Practitioner Training | Provide training to physicians on Stark Law requirements |
| Written Policies | Implement procedures that specifically address Stark Law compliance |
| Regular Audits | Conduct internal audits to identify potential violations before government agencies do |
| Documentation | Ensure all compensation agreements are in writing and comply with law |
Many physicians choose a proactive approach to ensuring compliance with Stark Law by having legal counsel review referral practices and provide training to practitioners. This approach is beneficial for many reasons, but it’s practical because penalties can be assessed even when the violation was an innocent mistake.
If you are a physician and you do not currently have procedures in place that specifically address compliance with Stark Law, your attorney can help you both understand the law and ensure compliance through the implementation of best practices. The time and effort involved in preventing a violation is of significant value, especially as it relates to mitigating the potential costs of non-compliance.
It’s important for physicians to retain legal counsel that has experience actually responding to investigations conducted by the Department of Health and Human Service. It’s also prudent to secure counsel that has experience dealing with the Inspector General.
| Quality | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Experience with HHS Investigations | Must have experience responding to Department of Health and Human Services investigations |
| Inspector General Experience | Should have experience dealing with OIG investigations and enforcement |
| Stark Law Expertise | Deep knowledge of Stark Law exceptions and compliance requirements |
| Healthcare Law Background | Understanding of healthcare fraud and abuse laws including Anti-Kickback Statute |
| Proactive Compliance Services | Can implement best practices to prevent violations |
| Defending Multiple Agencies | Can defend against Medicare, Medicaid, OIG, and DOJ |
The severity of the penalties is one of many reasons why practitioners should consult with legal counsel concerning internal processes and practices. Many physicians choose a proactive approach to ensuring compliance with Stark Law by having legal counsel review referral practices and provide training to practitioners. This approach is beneficial for many reasons, but it’s practical because penalties can be assessed even when the violation was an innocent mistake.
| Approach | Cost/Outcome |
|---|---|
| Proactive Compliance | Time and attorney fees for compliance program |
| Violation Penalties | Thousands per service + potential treble damages = up to $80+ million |
| Value of Prevention | Significant savings compared to penalty costs |
The time and effort involved in preventing a violation is of significant value, especially as it relates to mitigating the potential costs of non-compliance.
When a claim is brought against a physician for violating Stark Law, the practitioner’s attorney will generally have to defend them against Medicare, Medicaid, the Inspector General, and the Department of Justice. The charge is that the physician violated Stark Law, when intentional or unintentional.
If you are a physician and you do not currently have procedures in place that specifically address compliance with Stark Law, your attorney can help you both understand the law and ensure compliance through the implementation of best practices. The time and effort involved in preventing a violation is of significant value, especially as it relates to mitigating the potential costs of non-compliance.
Given that Stark Law is a strict liability statute and that penalties can be assessed even for innocent mistakes, proactive compliance is not optional – it’s essential for protecting your practice and your livelihood.

Very diligent, organized associates; got my case dismissed. Hard working attorneys who can put up with your anxiousness. I was accused of robbing a gemstone dealer. Definitely A law group that lays out all possible options and best alternative routes. Recommended for sure.
- ROBIN, GUN CHARGES ROBIN
NJ CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS