6 Signs Your MCA Funder Is About to File a Confession of Judgment Against You

The filing happens without you. That is the entire point.

A confession of judgment is not a lawsuit. It is the absence of one. You signed a document, probably on the same afternoon you signed everything else, that authorized the funder to walk into a courthouse and obtain a judgment against you and your business without a complaint, without a hearing, without notice, and without the inconvenience of allowing you to respond. By the time you discover what happened, the judgment is entered and your bank account is frozen. This is not a procedural accident. It is the designed outcome of the clause.

In 2019, New York restricted confessions of judgment for out-of-state merchants. The practice remains legal for businesses operating within the state. And for merchants everywhere, the signs that a filing is imminent follow a pattern that, once you recognize it, is difficult to misread.

The Funder Stops Calling

This is the sign most business owners misinterpret. After days or weeks of aggressive collection calls, the phone goes quiet. The emails cease. The funder, who was relentless in pursuing a resolution, suddenly has nothing to say.

Silence from a creditor is not mercy. It is preparation.

When the calls stop, the matter has typically moved from the collections department to the legal department. The funder has determined that negotiation is no longer the preferred path and has begun assembling the affidavit of default required to file the confession of judgment. In our experience, the gap between the last collection call and the filing is ten to twenty-one days. Sometimes less.

Multiple ACH Withdrawals Fail in a Compressed Window

The funder needs to establish default, and the contract defines default as a failure to remit payment. Each failed ACH attempt is documented. Each generates a record. The funder does not need many. In some agreements, a single failure is sufficient. In others, three consecutive failures within a specified period.

But here is the pattern: if the funder begins attempting withdrawals more frequently than the contract specifies (daily instead of weekly, or multiple times per day), they may be manufacturing a documentation trail for the affidavit. Seven of the contracts we reviewed in the past six months authorized the funder to attempt withdrawal at any time, not merely on the scheduled dates. That authorization turns your account into a testing ground for default.

The withdrawals were not intended to collect. They were intended to fail.

The Funder Requests Updated Financial Information

An MCA funder that suddenly asks for your most recent bank statements, tax returns, or accounts receivable aging report is not conducting a wellness check. They are assessing whether your assets justify the cost of enforcement.

A confession of judgment is only valuable if there is something to seize. Before filing, the funder (or, more precisely, the funder's attorney) evaluates whether your bank accounts hold sufficient funds to justify a restraining notice, whether your business assets are worth pursuing, and whether your personal guarantee is backed by assets the judgment can reach. The information request is the appraisal that precedes the seizure.

If you receive this request after you have already fallen behind on payments, the purpose is not reconciliation. It is reconnaissance.

Your Contract Contains a New York Choice of Law Provision

Pull your MCA agreement from the drawer. Read the dispute resolution section. If the contract specifies that disputes will be governed by New York law and adjudicated in New York courts, the funder has positioned itself to file the confession of judgment in the jurisdiction most favorable to that remedy.

New York remains, even after the 2019 reforms, the primary venue for confession of judgment filings in the MCA industry. The clerk's office in New York County processes these filings routinely. The mechanics are administrative: the funder's attorney presents the signed confession, an affidavit of default, and the required documentation. A clerk enters the judgment. No judge reviews the merits. No one contacts you.

Whether the court intended this streamlined process to serve the purposes it now serves is a question worth considering.

The Funder Contacts Your Payment Processor or Customers

When an MCA funder begins communicating with your credit card processor or contacts your customers to assert rights under the UCC-1 lien, they are doing two things simultaneously. The first is redirecting your revenue stream to recover the advance. The second is signaling that the relationship has moved past negotiation.

But the third purpose, the one that is rarely discussed, is evidentiary. The funder's communication with your processor or customers generates documentation of your financial position. If a customer confirms they owe you receivables, the funder now knows what assets are available post-judgment. If the processor redirects funds, the funder has demonstrated the enforceability of its contractual rights.

This is not collection. This is preparation for collection, which is a different and more concerning thing.

You Receive a Letter That Reads Like a Courtesy But Functions Like a Deadline

In some cases, the funder or its attorney will send a letter that appears conciliatory. It may reference the outstanding balance, note the default, and offer a final opportunity to resolve the matter. The letter may impose a response deadline, typically five to ten business days.

DEFENSE TEAM SPOTLIGHT

Todd Spodek

Lead Attorney & Founder

Featured on Netflix's "Inventing Anna," Todd Spodek brings decades of high-stakes criminal defense experience. His aggressive approach has secured dismissals and acquittals in cases others deemed unwinnable.

NY Bar Admitted Multi-State Licensed Federal Courts

Meet the Full Team

This letter is not an offer. It is a precondition. Some funders include this step to insulate the eventual filing from challenges based on good faith or procedural fairness. The letter creates a record: the merchant was notified, the merchant did not respond, the filing followed. Whether the letter satisfies any legal obligation depends on the jurisdiction and the specific contract, but its presence in the file strengthens the funder's position if the judgment is later contested.

If you receive this letter and do not respond with legal representation within the stated window, the next communication you receive will likely be from your bank, informing you that your account has been restrained.

The Filing You Do Not See

And here is what makes a confession of judgment different from every other legal consequence of MCA default: you do not get to respond before it happens. The entire procedure is designed to conclude before you are aware it has begun.

But the procedure is not unassailable. Confessions of judgment can be vacated. Motions under CPLR 5015 in New York have succeeded on grounds including fraud, misrepresentation, excusable default, lack of jurisdiction, and the invalidity of the underlying agreement. The Yellowstone Capital settlement demonstrated that confessions of judgment filed in connection with predatory MCA agreements do not survive scrutiny when scrutiny arrives.

The difficulty is timing. Once the judgment is entered and the restraining notice is served, every hour matters. An attorney who has filed these motions before, who understands the specific procedural requirements of the filing county, can move to vacate and lift the restraint in days. Not weeks. Days.

The first call is not a commitment. It is the step that determines whether the funder's filing is the end of the story or the beginning of a different one.