Virginia enacted one of the earliest commercial financing disclosure laws in the country and maintains a usury framework that applies to recharacterized MCAs. The state’s legal tools for MCA borrowers are substantial and well-established.
Virginia’s diverse economy — government contracting, technology, healthcare, hospitality, construction, and professional services in Northern Virginia, Richmond, Hampton Roads, and across the state — generates significant demand for small business working capital. MCA companies target Virginia businesses with products that carry costs far exceeding traditional financing, and the daily withdrawals strain the businesses the advances were supposed to support.
Virginia’s legal framework is among the more protective in the mid-Atlantic region, with a specific commercial financing disclosure law, a usury statute, and a consumer protection act that provides meaningful remedies for business owners harmed by deceptive practices.
The Legal Landscape in Virginia
Virginia’s Commercial Financing Disclosure law requires providers of commercial financing, including MCAs, to disclose standardized terms before the transaction is consummated. The required disclosures include the total amount financed, the total payment amount, the term, the payment schedule, and the annualized rate. Virginia was among the first states to adopt such requirements, and the law creates an enforceable standard. A funder that failed to provide accurate disclosures has violated Virginia law, and the violation is both an independent claim and evidence of the funder’s broader pattern of non-disclosure.
Virginia’s usury statute, Va. Code § 6.2-303, limits interest to 12% per annum for most transactions. Criminal usury provisions apply at higher thresholds. While certain commercial lending exemptions may apply to licensed lenders, a recharacterized MCA made by an entity not qualifying for the exemption is subject to the statutory limits. The effective APRs of recharacterized MCAs — typically 100% to 300% — exceed Virginia’s 12% cap by an order of magnitude.
Virginia’s Consumer Protection Act, Va. Code § 59.1-196 et seq., prohibits deceptive practices in commercial transactions and provides for actual damages, attorney’s fees, and in egregious cases, treble damages. The statute covers the marketing, pricing, servicing, and collection of commercial financing products. A broker who misrepresented the cost of the advance, a funder who refused reconciliation while claiming the transaction was a purchase, and a collector who threatened criminal prosecution for a civil debt are all exposed to CPA liability.
Virginia does not permit confessions of judgment. Va. Code § 8.01-432 renders any cognovit provision void and unenforceable. This prohibition provides Virginia business owners with full due process protection and ensures that MCA funders must litigate their claims through conventional proceedings.
Recharacterization and Usury
Virginia courts can apply the substance-over-form analysis to determine whether an MCA is a loan. The national framework — examining risk, reconciliation, guarantees, and collection mechanisms — provides the analytical tools. If the funder bore no genuine risk of loss, the MCA is a loan subject to Virginia’s usury and lending regulations.