The CFPB’s rule does not regulate MCA pricing. It does not cap rates. It does not ban confessions of judgment. What it does is far more fundamental: it creates visibility into a market that has operated in the dark for two decades.
Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act directed the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to collect data on lending to small businesses, including women-owned and minority-owned businesses. The CFPB’s final rule implementing Section 1071, issued in 2023, requires covered financial institutions to collect and report data on applications for credit from small businesses. The rule’s definition of “credit” includes merchant cash advances, bringing the MCA industry within the CFPB’s data collection framework for the first time.
What the Rule Requires
Covered institutions must collect data on each application for small business credit, including the type of product, the amount requested, the amount approved, the pricing terms, the action taken, and demographic information about the business owner. The data is reported to the CFPB and will be made publicly available in a manner that protects individual privacy.
For MCA companies, the rule means that for the first time, their origination volume, approval rates, pricing practices, and the demographic profile of their borrowers will be visible to regulators, researchers, advocates, and the public. The opacity that has characterized the MCA industry — the absence of reliable data on market size, pricing, default rates, and borrower outcomes — will be replaced by a comprehensive dataset that allows meaningful analysis and accountability.
Why Data Matters
Data is the prerequisite for effective regulation. Without data, regulators cannot identify patterns of discrimination, assess whether pricing is predatory, measure default rates, or evaluate the industry’s impact on small business communities. With data, all of these analyses become possible. The CFPB’s dataset will allow researchers to compare MCA pricing to the pricing of alternative products, identify geographic and demographic disparities in access and cost, and measure the correlation between MCA originations and business outcomes.
The data will also support individual borrowers. When a business owner challenges an MCA agreement, the CFPB data may provide context — how the pricing on their advance compares to the market, whether the funder’s pricing practices disproportionately affect certain communities, and whether the funder’s approval patterns suggest discriminatory or predatory targeting.
The Rule’s Limitations
The Section 1071 rule does not regulate MCA pricing, terms, or practices. It does not cap rates. It does not require reconciliation. It does not ban confessions of judgment. It is a data collection and reporting requirement, not a substantive regulation. The rule creates visibility. What regulators and legislators do with that visibility is the next chapter.