24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials

5

THE BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR.

The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation

Blog

How Sentencing Guidelines Impact Federal Drug Cases in New York

March 21, 2024 Uncategorized

 

How Sentencing Guidelines Impact Federal Drug Cases in New York

The sentencing guidelines have had a huge impact on federal drug cases in New York and across the country. The guidelines establish a complex system of offense levels and criminal history categories that determine the sentencing range for federal crimes. For drug offenses, the guidelines take into account the type and quantity of drugs involved. This has led to long mandatory minimum sentences for many drug defendants.

Lets take a look at how this plays out for some examples. Say someone is convicted of selling 50 grams of meth. Under the guidelines, that amount of meth carries a base offense level of 32. If they have no criminal history, that puts them in Category I, so their sentencing range would be 121-151 months under the guidelines. The judge would have very little discretion to go lower than 121 months.

For a heroin case involving 100 grams, the base offense level is 26. So for a first time offender in Category I, the range is 63-78 months. Again, the judge cannot go lower unless the prosecutor files a motion for a downward departure based on substantial assistance.

These mandatory minimums have really limited judicial discretion. Back in the day before guidelines, a judge could sentence how they saw fit based on the circumstances. Now their hands are tied by the rigid structure of the sentencing table. And because the drug quantities trigger mandatory minimums, the impact is huge.

There are some exceptions. Such as the “safety valve” provision that allows judges to go below mandatory minimums for low level first time offenders who meet certain criteria. But those cases are few and far between.

Impact on Low-Level Offenders

The guidelines have hit low level drug offenders particularly hard. Even defendants with minor roles get stuck with long sentences because the guidelines are driven so much by drug type and quantity. For example, look at the case of Alfonso Allen. He was a first time offender who drove a friend to a drug deal as a favor. He didn’t know much about the deal and wasn’t going to get paid. But 9 ounces of crack were involved, so Allen got sentenced to life in prison.

There are countless cases like this where low level mules or girlfriends get sentenced based on the whole drug quantity, even if their role was minimal. The guidelines don’t really account for role in the offense. So you have all these bit players doing decades while the kingpins skate if they cooperate.

And the stacking provisions make it worse. Under 841 and 924, you can face consecutive sentences for the drug charge plus a gun enhancement. So you get hit with double mandatory minimums when it was really the same basic conduct.

Impact of Drug Type

The guidelines also have huge disparities based on drug type that many criticize as unfair. The most glaring example is the 100 to 1 crack versus powder cocaine ratio. Under the guidelines, it takes 100 times as much powder cocaine to trigger the same sentences as crack. This had a huge disproportionate impact on minority defendants who were more likely to be charged with crack. A typical case would be 500 grams of powder would yield around 2 years, while only 5 grams of crack gets you 10 years. This contributed to mass incarceration of African Americans and finally got reduced to 18 to 1 with the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. But sentences are still much harsher for crack across the board.

Heroin and meth also face harsher sentences than powder cocaine. The 2016 guidelines amendment tried to reduce the disparity between heroin and cocaine offenses. But there is still work to be done on reducing disparities between drug types.

Safety Valves and Exceptions

There are some exceptions in the guidelines that give judges a bit more flexibility in drug cases. The main one is the “safety valve” provision in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) and §5C1.2 of the guidelines. This allows the judge to sentence below a mandatory minimum if the defendant meets all these requirements:

  • First time offender with 1 criminal history point or less
  • Did not use violence or possess a weapon
  • Played a minor role in the offense
  • Cooperated with the prosecution

If they meet all that, the judge can disregard the mandatory minimums and guidelines to sentence how they see fit. This provides a useful exception for truly low level first timers. But the requirements are still fairly strict.

Another small reprieve is the Drugs Minus Two amendment. This allows judges to reduce the offense level by 2 points if the defendant meets the 5C1.2 safety valve criteria. So it slightly reduces the sentencing range but doesn’t override mandatory minimums.

Prosecutors can also file motions for downward departures under §5K1.1 of the guidelines if the defendant provides substantial assistance. This is how most mandatory minimums get waived in return for cooperation.

But outside of cooperation, the exceptions are fairly narrow. The safety valve and Drugs Minus Two only help certain first time offenders. The drug type and quantity still drives most sentences.

Calls for Reform

There is growing recognition that the harsh sentencing guidelines have gone too far and need reform. Mandatory minimums leave little room for judicial discretion and rehabilitation. Here are some of the main criticisms and calls for change:

  • Repeal most or all mandatory minimums – gives judges flexibility
  • Reduce disparity between drug types like crack vs. powder
  • Account for role in the offense, not just quantity
  • Add more exceptions like safety valve that reduce severity
  • Make guidelines fully advisory rather than presumptive
  • Reduce offense levels for drug quantities
  • Increase availability of diversion programs as an alternative to incarceration

There has been some progress with reforms like the Fair Sentencing Act. But many advocates argue the guidelines remain too rigid and harsh in drug cases. As we see rising calls for criminal justice reform, sentencing policies will continue to be scrutinized.

Conclusion

The sentencing guidelines have transformed federal drug sentencing and contributed to mass incarceration. By setting drug quantities and types to mandatory minimums, they have limited judicial discretion. This has resulted in long sentences for many low level and minority defendants based on formulaic guidelines. While some reforms have been achieved, advocates argue much work remains to create a more just and flexible sentencing system.

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile

RALPH P. FRANCHO, JR

Associate

view profile

JEREMY FEIGENBAUM

Associate Attorney

view profile

ELIZABETH GARVEY

Associate

view profile

CLAIRE BANKS

Associate

view profile

RAJESH BARUA

Of-Counsel

view profile

CHAD LEWIN

Of-Counsel

view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now