24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

New Jersey Section 2C:35-29 – Definitions relative to industrial use of certain chemicals; not deemed a CDS, certain; inferences.

New Jersey Law Provides Exemptions for Industrial Use of Certain Chemicals

New Jersey has a law, Section 2C:35-29, that provides exemptions for the industrial use of certain chemicals that would otherwise be considered controlled dangerous substances (CDS). This law aims to avoid criminalizing legitimate industrial uses of chemicals while still restricting the use of these substances for illegal purposes.

Background on Controlled Substances

New Jersey, like other states, has laws prohibiting the unauthorized manufacture, distribution, dispensing and possession of substances classified as CDS. This includes drugs like heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine and prescription medications with a potential for abuse. The intent of CDS laws is to curb drug abuse and addiction by tightly controlling access to these substances.

However, some chemicals used illegally as drugs also have legitimate industrial applications. For instance, red phosphorus is used to illicitly manufacture methamphetamine but it also has uses in pesticides and incendiary devices. Without exemptions, blanket bans on CDS could inadvertently criminalize lawful industries that rely on these chemicals.

Exemptions for Legitimate Industrial Uses

To avoid this, Section 2C:35-29 specifically exempts certain chemicals from being classified as CDS when used for industrial purposes. This prevents criminal prosecution for possession, distribution or use of these substances when done lawfully.

The law states that any chemical whose only use is for industrial purposes, and is not used to produce a drug, is not considered a CDS even if it is chemically similar to illegal drugs. For example, pseudoephedrine is a key ingredient in methamphetamine but is also found in many over-the-counter cold medications. The law exempts possession of pseudoephedrine by companies that produce those cold medications, so they can’t be prosecuted for CDS possession.

The law also exempts chemicals that have both illicit drug uses and legitimate industrial uses. Substances like red phosphorus or iodine are used in manufacturing but are also precursors for meth and other illegal drugs. Under Section 2C:35-29, companies can legally obtain these chemicals for industrial uses like manufacturing fertilizers, flares or pharmaceuticals.

Protections for Lawful Use

The law specifies that exempt chemical substances cannot be considered CDS provided they are possessed or distributed:

  • In a manner authorized by state and federal law
  • As part of lawful industrial or manufacturing purposes
  • Without intent to use them for producing, preparing or synthesizing illegal drugs

So companies that obtain these chemicals legitimately, follow proper licensing and regulations, and don’t use them for illegal ends are protected.

However, someone trying to obtain the same chemicals without proper licensing or with intent to manufacture drugs would still be subject to criminal charges. So the law does not provide a loophole for illegal use of these substances.

Burden of Proof

Because some of these chemicals have dual uses, Section 2C:35-29 also discusses the burden of proof. It states that possession of exempt chemicals alone does not prove intent to use them illegally.

Prosecutors cannot claim someone possessed a chemical in order to manufacture drugs based solely on the substance itself. They must provide additional evidence of criminal intent and use. This prevents lawful industries from being prosecuted solely for possessing dual-use substances.

However, in cases where illegal use is proven, possession of larger-than-normal quantities of an exempt substance can be used as corroborating evidence of intent. But quantity alone is not enough to prove a crime without other evidence.

Implications

Section 2C:35-29 provides important protections for legitimate companies that rely on chemicals also used in drug manufacturing. Without these exemptions, lawful industries could face criminal charges simply for possessing necessary compounds and ingredients. This would severely hamper sectors like agriculture, pharmaceuticals, and manufacturing.

However, critics note that exemptions also make it easier for individuals to obtain precursor chemicals for illegal use by masking it as industrial purposes. Law enforcement has to meet a higher burden of proof to show intent to manufacture drugs rather than just possession of a CDS.
But on balance, the exemptions seem necessary to avoid over-criminalization. And the law still allows charges for exempt chemicals when intent and illegal use can be established. This helps preserve public safety while enabling beneficial industrial activities. Other states may want to consider similar exemptions as a way to balance interests of industry and law enforcement.
Overall, Section 2C:35-29 represents a reasonable compromise that promotes economic activity while still working to restrict drug abuse. The exemptions allow industries that need these chemicals to operate lawfully in New Jersey. And by including standards around intent and use, the law still provides means to prosecute those who try to exploit the exemptions for nefarious purposes.
Schedule Your Consultation Now