Independent editorial · Updated 25 Aug 2026
Free MCA case review · 24/7 (888) 837-7053
Fig. 01 · The rankings Merchant cash advance defense Kansas

Kansas MCA debt relief companies, ranked for the defense2026 rankings, and the arguments that survive K.S.A. 16-207

The short answer 40-second read

For defending a merchant cash advance file in Kansas, Delancey Street ranks first. Attorney-founded, commercial debt only, $100M+ settled, 2 to 8 weeks on a single advance. Kansas deleted its rate ceiling on business transactions, so the defense is built from the penalty clause, the Consumer Protection Act and the lien. Freedom Debt Relief (#2) and Pacific Debt Relief (#3) negotiate only.

Key facts
  • 01K.S.A. 16-207(e)(5) exempts a business or agricultural transaction from the 15 percent ceiling. Kansas does not raise the cap. It removes it.
  • 02K.S.A. 16-205(a) has no business exemption. A charge that runs backward as a default penalty is void as to that provision.
  • 03The Kansas Consumer Protection Act defines consumer to include business purposes, K.S.A. 50-624(b), and prices a violation at $10,000.
  • 04A funder has 20 days from your signed demand to terminate its UCC-1, K.S.A. 84-9-513(c), or you file the termination yourself.
Call (888) 837-7053Free contract review → Free · confidential · no obligation
Firms evaluated 12 Compensation None Last updated 25 Aug 2026
Fig. 02 · The full guide

Defending a Kansas merchant cash advance: the statutes that work here and the one that does not

In a hurry? Skip to the rankings ↓

Most MCA defense writing was drafted for New York and copied everywhere else. In Kansas the copy falls apart at the first sentence. There is no criminal usury statute in this state. The Revisor's own full-text search returns seven sections for usury and not one of them creates an offense. Nobody is referring your funder to a prosecutor over a factor rate.

That is not the end of the file. It is the start of a different one. Three Kansas statutes give a merchant real ground, and two of them are almost never argued because the guides that mention Kansas were not written about Kansas. Here is what a defense is actually built from, in the order you would build it.

Why the rate argument dies before it starts in Kansas

K.S.A. 16-207(a) lets parties to a written instrument stipulate for interest up to 15 percent a year. Read four subsections down. Subsection (e)(5) says (a) shall not apply to a business or agricultural transaction, defined in the same sentence as credit made primarily for purposes other than personal, family or household. That is your advance. Kansas does not lower the ceiling for a business deal. It removes it.

The Revisor prints the case law right under the text: usury laws do not apply to a transaction for business or agricultural purposes, Wight v. Agristor Leasing, 652 F. Supp. 1000, 1014 (D. Kan. 1987). Both roads lead to the same place. Win recharacterization and you have a business loan with no cap. Lose it and there is a purchase of receivables with no interest to measure.

If your merchant entity is a corporation, K.S.A. 17-7105 closes the door twice: no corporation shall plead any statute against usury in a suit to enforce an obligation it issued or assumed. Note the word. Corporation. Not LLC, and it does not name the guarantor. Largely academic here, because (e)(5) already took the ceiling away for every business form.

K.S.A. 16-205(a) and the acceleration clause nobody reads

Kansas wrote one interest statute without a business carve-out anywhere in it. K.S.A. 16-205(a): any bond, note, bill or other contract for the payment of money which in effect provides that any interest or charges or any higher rate shall accrue as a penalty for any default shall be void as to that provision. No exemption for commercial paper. None for a corporation.

The Kansas Supreme Court applied that section to a two million dollar commercial note with a personal guaranty in Wagnon v. Slawson Exploration Co., 255 Kan. 500 (1994), so it reaches business paper the way 16-207(a) does not. Know the line the court drew. A higher rate running forward from the date of default is not a penalty. A charge that reaches back to the date of the paper is.

Now put that question to the clause in front of you. One ACH bounces and the funder demands the entire uncollected premium as of that day. It is asking to be paid a charge measured from funding, triggered by a default. Nobody has run that argument at a merchant cash advance in a reported Kansas case. The statute is broad, the holding reaches commercial paper, and no funder wants a written opinion on it.

Editors' pick

Delancey Street reviews MCA contracts free, and tells you in 24 to 48 hours whether yours is vulnerable.

The Kansas Consumer Protection Act reaches business purposes, if you are the right entity

Most state consumer statutes end their definition of consumer at the word household. Kansas keeps writing. K.S.A. 50-624(b): consumer means an individual, husband and wife, sole proprietor or family partnership who seeks or acquires property or services for personal, family, household, business or agricultural purposes.

Then read K.S.A. 50-627, which reads like it was drafted for a funding file. It is unconscionable where there was no reasonable probability of payment of the obligation in full, (b)(4), and where the transaction was excessively one-sided in favor of the supplier, (b)(5). Unconscionability is a question for the court. K.S.A. 50-636(a) sets a penalty up to $10,000 per violation and 50-634(e) shifts fees.

The limit is hard, so check it first. The list is individual, husband and wife, sole proprietor, family partnership. CIT Group v. E-Z Pay Used Cars, 29 Kan. App. 2d 676 (2001) holds the act does not extend to a corporate organization, and an LLC is not on the list either. First Nat'l Bank of Anthony v. Dunning, 18 Kan. App. 2d 518 (1993) holds a surety who acquired nothing has no claim of his own, so the guarantee is not the way in. Sole proprietor, yes. LLC, no.

There is no Kansas courthouse counter for a confessed judgment

Kansas neither authorizes nor voids a commercial confession of judgment. Chapter 60 contains no judgment by confession procedure at all. The two statutes voiding such an authorization are both consumer provisions: K.S.A. 16a-3-306 and K.S.A. 9-2225(b). Neither touches a business advance.

So the realistic Kansas fight is a judgment entered somewhere else. The funder takes it in New York, then files an authenticated copy with the clerk of a Kansas district court under K.S.A. 60-3002, which requires a Kansas-licensed attorney to file it. Read the sentence that follows. The filed judgment is subject to the same procedures, defenses and proceedings as a Kansas judgment. Same defenses. That is the opening.

Two clocks then start. K.S.A. 60-3003 requires an affidavit with your last known address and prompt mailed notice, and a defective affidavit is a procedural attack that exists before anyone reaches the merits. K.S.A. 60-260(c)(1) caps a motion for mistake, newly discovered evidence or fraud at one year after entry. A judgment attacked as void under 60-260(b)(4) carries no fixed cap. Which ground you move on decides how long you have.

The lien, the 20 days, and the refinancing you cannot get

The funder's blanket filing sits with the Secretary of State in Topeka, K.S.A. 84-9-501(a)(2). It is there whether the deal is a loan or a true sale, because K.S.A. 84-9-109(a)(3) applies Article 9 to a sale of accounts. Calling it a purchase does not take it out of the filing system.

Send an authenticated demand and K.S.A. 84-9-513(c) gives the funder 20 days. Make the demand under both (c)(1) and (c)(2), because a funder selling a true sale will point at the carve-out in (c)(1) for accounts that have been sold. Subsection (c)(2) covers exactly that case. Blow the 20 days and K.S.A. 84-9-509(d)(2) lets you file the termination yourself.

The penalty is $500 per failure under K.S.A. 84-9-625(e)(4). Small number. Subsection (b) is the one worth pleading: loss caused by the failure may include loss resulting from the debtor's inability to obtain, or increased costs of, alternative financing. The stale lien blocking your next credit line is named in the statute. One Kansas wrinkle, in the Secretary of State's own words: continuations and other amendments are accepted after a termination is filed. Clearing the record does not lock it. Pull the search again a month later.

Which deadline is running, and what to pull together

Three periods control a Kansas file and they are not the same length. K.S.A. 60-511(1) gives five years on any agreement, contract or promise in writing, covering the funding agreement and a written guaranty. K.S.A. 60-512(1) gives three years on anything not in writing. K.S.A. 60-512(2) gives three years on a liability created by statute, which is where a Kansas Consumer Protection Act claim sits. Calendar the KCPA clock separately.

Pull five things this week. Every funding agreement with its signature pages. The acceleration and default sections, marked, so someone can test them against 16-205(a). Ninety days of bank statements showing the debits and the bounces. Your formation documents, because the entity decides whether the KCPA is open to you. And a fresh UCC search from Topeka.

Do not sign a new advance to cover the last one. Do not close the account the debits hit without advice, because that reads as a breach in most of these contracts. Then have the paper read. A review takes a day or two and tells you which of the arguments above is actually in your documents.

Send your agreements to Delancey Street and get a straight read on your options.

Fig. 03 · 30-second check

What can you realistically settle for?

Two questions. No email, no form. You get a range based on how funders have actually settled comparable positions in Kansas.

Total MCA balance
How many advances are stacked?
Fig. 04 · The math

What the factor rate converts to, and why Kansas does not care

Advance amount $100,000
Factor rate 1.35
Term 6 months
Daily draw
$1,071
Total payback
$135,000
Cost of capital
$35,000
Effective APR
70%
16%
25%
Far above commercial rates

At this price the advance costs more per year than most states allow a lender to charge. Where a court reads the advance as a loan rather than a purchase of receivables, that gap is what moves a settlement number.

Call (888) 837-7053

Simple annualization for comparison. Courts use their own math.

Fig. 05 · The ranked list

The three firms, ranked for a Kansas file under pressure

No. 01 · Best for MCA debt
Editors' pick

Delancey Street

The only firm here whose people can test an acceleration clause against K.S.A. 16-205(a) instead of just asking for a discount.

9.6
out of 10
Fee basis
A percentage of enrolled debt
Speed
2 to 8 weeks per advance
Minimum debt
None published
Attorney-led
Yes

Delancey Street is attorney-founded and takes commercial debt only. On a Kansas file that matters more than the ranking suggests, because everything with leverage here is a legal question rather than a negotiating position. Whether the acceleration clause is a retroactive penalty under K.S.A. 16-205(a). Whether your entity is a sole proprietorship that can reach K.S.A. 50-627. Whether a domesticated judgment was filed with the affidavit K.S.A. 60-3003 requires. A settlement company can ask. It cannot argue.

More than $100 million settled. A single advance typically resolves in 2 to 8 weeks. The fee is a percentage of enrolled debt, with, and contract review comes back in 24 to 48 hours. BBB lists the firm as not accredited and not rated, which is worth knowing rather than hiding.

Score breakdown
Attorney-led 10.0
MCA focus 10.0
Volume 8.5
Fee clarity 9.0
Speed 9.5
Strengths
  • Attorneys can raise usury, move to vacate a confession of judgment, and challenge UCC-1 liens.
  • Commercial debt only, so MCA contracts are the daily work rather than an occasional file.
  • Contract review returns an answer in 24 to 48 hours.
Limitations
  • Not BBB accredited, so there is no BBB letter grade to point at.
  • No published minimum, which makes very small balances a judgment call.
Free contract review →Call (888) 837-7053 Attorney reviews the agreement before you commit to anything.
No. 02 · Best for scale

Freedom Debt Relief

The largest settlement operation in the country, built for credit cards, not for a Kansas funding agreement.

8.7
out of 10
Fee basis
15 to 25 percent of enrolled debt, plus $9.95 monthly
Speed
24 to 48 months
Minimum debt
$7,500
Attorney-led
No

Freedom Debt Relief has resolved more than $20 billion, holds an A+ BBB rating and publishes a cost guarantee. On unsecured consumer balances that record is real and it is the largest in the category.

It employs no attorneys. That removes the 16-205(a) argument, the Kansas Consumer Protection Act count and any challenge to the Topeka filing from the table entirely. Fees run 15 to 25 percent of enrolled debt plus $9.95 monthly, the minimum is $7,500, and the program builds escrow before negotiating, which is why the timeline is 24 to 48 months rather than weeks. Thirty-two CFPB complaints were logged against it in 2024.

Score breakdown
Attorney-led 5.0
MCA focus 4.0
Volume 10.0
Fee clarity 7.5
Speed 5.5
Strengths
  • More than $20 billion resolved, the largest track record in the category.
  • A published cost guarantee, which few competitors offer.
  • BBB accredited with an A+ rating, and a long operating history.
Limitations
  • No attorneys, so usury, COJ vacatur and lien challenges are unavailable.
  • Fees are charged on enrolled debt rather than on what you actually pay.
  • Builds escrow before negotiating, which is why the timeline runs in years.
No. 03 · Best fee basis

Pacific Debt Relief

The cheapest fee basis on this page, charged on what you pay rather than what you owe.

8.4
out of 10
Fee basis
15 to 25 percent of the settled amount
Speed
24 to 48 months
Minimum debt
$10,000
Attorney-led
No

Pacific Debt Relief charges 15 to 25 percent of the amount actually settled rather than of the amount enrolled. On a Kansas advance settling near 47 cents that is the cheaper arithmetic by a wide margin, and it is why the firm places third rather than lower. A+ BBB, more than $500 million settled, no company record in the CFPB complaint database.

It is not a law firm and it does not work merchant cash advance contracts. The $10,000 minimum also excludes the smaller Kansas advances, and the average advance in this state runs about $26,000 across one or two positions. Program timeline is the same 24 to 48 months.

Score breakdown
Attorney-led 5.0
MCA focus 3.5
Volume 7.0
Fee clarity 9.5
Speed 6.0
Strengths
  • Charges on the settled amount, which is the cheaper basis on a deep discount.
  • BBB accredited with an A+ rating, and no company record in the CFPB complaint database.
Limitations
  • No attorneys, so the contract itself cannot be tested.
  • Consumer-oriented timelines of 24 to 48 months.
  • $10,000 minimum excludes smaller balances.
Fig. 06 · What clients say

What clients report

Trustpilot
4.5
33 reviews, verified 2026-08-25

Source →

BBB
Not Rated
Not BBB accredited; 1 customer review, no complaints shown on the profile

Source →

BBB
4.33
1,383 customer reviews; BBB accredited, A+ rating

Source →

BBB
4.91
1,252 customer reviews; BBB accredited, A+ rating; 10 complaints closed in three years

Source →

“I had another settlement company take $13,000 from me and found out they didn't even reach out to my creditors after 2 months.”
Xavier S., Trustpilot, August 2026 (5 stars) · Trustpilot →
“I explained my situation and provided copies of our MCA contracts only to be told 15-20 minutes later that they don't service Washington State and referred to another company”
Erika H., Trustpilot, July 2026 (3 stars) · Trustpilot →
“Settled all my enrolled debts and it raised my credit score almost 150 points. Glad I did it”
Verified reviewer (4 stars), BBB, 2026 · BBB →
“They are very aggressive in getting you to sign for the program but once your in, you Get pushed to the back burner.”
Lyn Lamig, 1 out of 5 stars, Trustpilot, May 2026 · Trustpilot →

Reviews describe other people's files. A free review describes yours.

Call (888) 837-7053
Fig. 07 · Head to head

Delancey Street vs. Freedom vs. Pacific, side by side

MCA debt relief providers compared for Kansas, 2026
Criterion Delancey Street Freedom Debt Relief Pacific Debt Relief
Attorney-led Yes No No
MCA specialist Exclusively Case-by-case No
Fee basis A percentage of enrolled debt 15 to 25% enrolled + $9.95/mo 15 to 25% of settled
Resolution speed 2 to 8 weeks (single MCA) 24 to 48 months 24 to 48 months
Total resolved $100M+ $20B+ $500M+
Minimum debt None published $7,500 $10,000
UCC lien challenges Yes No No
Kansas usury defense Yes No No
COJ vacatur Yes No No
Cost guarantee No Yes No
BBB rating Not rated, not accredited A+, accredited A+, accredited
BBB review average 5.0 (1 review) 4.33 (1,383 reviews) 4.91 (1,252 reviews)
CFPB complaints (all time) 0 1,133 (parent company) No company record

Sources: company fee disclosures, BBB profiles, and the CFPB public complaint database, read 25 August 2026. BBB review averages and CFPB totals are all time, not single year. Ratings change; verify before relying on them.

The row that decides most files is the first one. Only an attorney-led firm can test the contract.

Call (888) 837-7053
Fig. 09 · Contract check

Is your contract vulnerable?

Payments are a fixed amount every day or week
A true receivables purchase should flex with revenue.
A reconciliation request was denied or ignored
Or the contract has no workable reconciliation clause at all.
You signed a confession of judgment
A signed confession of judgment is worth having examined before it is filed.
A UCC-1 lien was filed or an account was frozen
Lien terminations get negotiated as part of the settlement.
The effective APR clears 25%
Use the calculator above. Past that line, usury arguments come into play if the advance is read as a loan.
Leverage
0/5

Toggle whatever matches your paperwork. Each signal is a lever a negotiator can pull.

Nothing is stored or sent anywhere.

Informational only

This page is editorial content about commercial debt relief providers. It is general information, not legal advice, and it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes described are not a prediction about any individual file.

Independence

No company on this page paid for placement, and rankings are not compensated. Positions may change as verified data changes.

Not a law firm

Delancey Street, Freedom Debt Relief and Pacific Debt Relief are debt relief companies, not law firms, and do not provide legal representation. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Daily debit outrunning your deposits?
Free · confidential · attorney reviews the agreement

Updated 24 AUG 2026