Independent editorial · Updated 25 Aug 2026
Free MCA case review · 24/7 (888) 837-7053
Fig. 01 · The rankings Merchant cash advance defense New Hampshire

Best business debt settlement companies in New Hampshire2026 rankings, scored on fee basis and legal reach

The short answer 40-second read

For New Hampshire business debt, Delancey Street ranks first. Attorney-founded, commercial debt only, $100M+ settled, 2 to 8 weeks per advance. Freedom Debt Relief (#2) has the largest platform, Pacific Debt Relief (#3) the cheapest fee basis. Neither employs attorneys, and here the statute worth citing is a disclosure statute.

Key facts
  • 01RSA 399-B:2 makes any person extending credit hand you a written finance charge statement at signing.
  • 02A willful RSA 399-B violation is a felony when the violator is not a natural person. RSA 399-B:4.
  • 03RSA 358-A damages start at actual or $1,000, and run 2 to 3 times for a willful violation.
  • 04You have three years to file. RSA 508:4, I. One of the shortest windows in the country.
Call (888) 837-7053Free contract review → Free · confidential · no obligation
Firms evaluated 12 Compensation None Last updated 25 Aug 2026
Fig. 02 · The full guide

Business debt settlement in New Hampshire: what it costs, what it buys, and which statute does the work

In a hurry? Skip to the rankings ↓

Settlement is a private negotiation with a creditor to take less than the balance and close the account. No filing, no hearing, no public record. What decides the number is not persuasion. It is what happens to that creditor if the file goes the other way.

In New Hampshire that answer is unusual. There is no usury cap to threaten anyone with. There is a disclosure statute almost nobody cites, a consumer protection act written to cover corporations, and a three year clock that runs faster than you expect.

What business debt settlement is, and what it is not

A settlement firm approaches each creditor and negotiates a reduced payoff. Nothing is filed. Nothing appears on a docket. The account closes as settled rather than paid in full, and the reduction is normally taxable, which is a conversation for your accountant before you sign anything.

What settlement is not: a program that tells you to stop paying and save into an escrow account for two years. That is the consumer model, and it is priced and paced for credit cards. On commercial paper with a daily draw, the escrow you are told to build is money the creditor is already taking out of the operating account.

Settlement is also not the answer when there is no business left to save. If revenue has stopped, if personal guaranty exposure exceeds anything the business could generate, or if a judgment has already been executed against your accounts, the honest conversation is about restructuring or a wind-down. A firm that never raises those options is selling a program.

RSA 399-B, the statute your funder probably ignored

This is the New Hampshire hook that is not limited to consumers, and it is the reason a Granite State file can be worth more than a neighboring state's.

RSA 399-B:2 says any person engaged in the business of extending credit shall furnish, concurrently with the transaction, a clear written statement of the finance charges, expressed in dollars, rate of interest, or monthly rate of charge, or a combination. RSA 399-B:1, I defines credit broadly enough to catch the deal you signed: it includes any loan, advance, or discount, plus any purchase or other acquisition of an obligation, and any transaction having a similar purpose or effect.

The only escape is RSA 399-B:2-a, and it runs the wrong way for a funder. It excuses a disclosure only in a consumer credit transaction as defined at RSA 358-K:1, V, and only when made in conformity with Regulation Z or Regulation M. A business advance gets no shelter at all.

RSA 399-B:3 then says no person shall extend credit in contravention of the chapter, and RSA 399-B:4 makes a willful violation a misdemeanor for a natural person and a felony for anyone else. Every funder is an anyone else. Pull your funding package and see whether a dollar figure for the finance charge is anywhere in it.

Editors' pick

Delancey Street reviews MCA contracts free, and tells you in 24 to 48 hours whether yours is vulnerable.

The Consumer Protection Act that is not limited to consumers

RSA 358-A:1, I defines person to include corporations, trusts, partnerships, incorporated and unincorporated associations, and any other legal entity. Your LLC is a person under this chapter. RSA 358-A:2 makes it unlawful for any person to use an unfair or deceptive act or practice in trade or commerce within the state.

RSA 358-A:10, I is where it gets expensive for the other side. Any person injured recovers actual damages or $1,000, whichever is greater, and if the violation was willful or knowing the court awards between two and three times that amount, plus costs and reasonable attorney's fees. The same paragraph says any attempted waiver of those damages is void and unenforceable, so the waiver buried in the funding agreement does not survive contact with the statute.

The exemption a funder will reach for is RSA 358-A:3, I, which carves out trade or commerce subject to the jurisdiction of the bank commissioner and similar regulators. Read it against the licensing chapter. RSA 399-A does not reach business advances, so an unlicensed funder is not under the bank commissioner's jurisdiction and has no regulated industry to hide behind. That reading rests on the statutory text; no New Hampshire decision confirming it was opened for this page.

What it costs, and why the basis beats the percentage

All three firms quote a similar percentage. They charge it on different things, and that is the entire cost difference.

  • Delancey Street. A percentage of enrolled debt. No published minimum.
  • Freedom Debt Relief. 15 to 25 percent of enrolled debt plus $9.95 monthly. $7,500 minimum. 24 to 48 months.
  • Pacific Debt Relief. 15 to 25 percent of the settled amount. $10,000 minimum. 24 to 48 months.

Run the arithmetic on a Concord file. Enroll $50,000, settle at 46 cents for $23,000. At 20 percent of enrolled debt the fee is $10,000. At 20 percent of the settlement it is $4,600. Same percentage, less than half the money.

That is Pacific's structural advantage and it is real. What it does not buy is a demand letter under RSA 399-B or a claim under RSA 358-A:10, because neither firm at #2 or #3 employs attorneys. Price the fee against what the file can actually be worth, not against the fee alone.

New Hampshire gives you three years, not six

RSA 508:4, I covers all personal actions except slander and libel and sets three years from the act or omission, with a discovery rule for injuries that could not reasonably have been found sooner. There is no longer separate period for written instruments here. A breach claim on a funding agreement runs on the same three years, and so does an RSA 358-A claim under RSA 358-A:3, IV-a.

Two carve-outs matter. RSA 508:5 gives twenty years on actions of debt upon judgments and contracts under seal, which is the period that runs against you once a judgment is domesticated. RSA 508:9 excludes from the count any period the defendant was absent from and residing outside the state, which is the ordinary posture of a New York funder and can extend your window rather than shorten it.

Three years cuts both ways in a negotiation. As a creditor's window narrows its appetite for a discount grows. As yours narrows, the disclosure and deceptive practice claims that give the file its value quietly expire.

Seven questions before you sign with anyone

  1. Is the fee charged on enrolled debt or on the settled amount. Get it in the agreement, not in an email.
  2. Is anything due before a settlement closes, and is there a monthly charge on top.
  3. What is the minimum enrolled balance. $7,500 and $10,000 rule out smaller files entirely.
  4. Are there attorneys, and will one of them sign a demand letter under RSA 399-B.
  5. Does the settlement document itself include UCC-1 termination language.
  6. What happens if a creditor sues while I am enrolled. Get the answer before it happens.
  7. How long, honestly, in weeks. Answer in months over twelve is a consumer program with a commercial label.

Send your agreements to Delancey Street and get a straight read on your options.

Fig. 03 · 30-second check

What can you realistically settle for?

Two questions. No email, no form. You get a range based on how funders have actually settled comparable positions in New Hampshire.

Total MCA balance
How many advances are stacked?
Fig. 04 · The math

What your advance actually costs per year

Advance amount $100,000
Factor rate 1.35
Term 6 months
Daily draw
$1,071
Total payback
$135,000
Cost of capital
$35,000
Effective APR
70%
16%
25%
Far above commercial rates

At this price the advance costs more per year than most states allow a lender to charge. Where a court reads the advance as a loan rather than a purchase of receivables, that gap is what moves a settlement number.

Call (888) 837-7053

Simple annualization for comparison. Courts use their own math.

Fig. 05 · The ranked list

The three firms worth calling in New Hampshire

No. 01 · Best for MCA debt
Editors' pick

Delancey Street

The only firm here that can put RSA 399-B and RSA 358-A behind a demand letter.

9.6
out of 10
Fee basis
A percentage of enrolled debt
Speed
2 to 8 weeks per advance
Minimum debt
None published
Attorney-led
Yes

Attorney-founded, and it takes commercial debt only. In New Hampshire that determines what a file is worth. RSA 399-B:2 is a disclosure duty a funder either satisfied or did not, and RSA 358-A:10 prices a willful violation at two to three times damages plus fees. Both are lawyer work. Neither is something a settlement company can put in a letter with a straight face.

More than $100 million settled, all commercial. Single advances close in 2 to 8 weeks, multi-funder stacks in 3 to 12 months. Fees are a percentage of enrolled debt.

The honest marks against it: BBB lists the firm as not accredited and Not Rated, its Trustpilot base is 33 reviews, and it declines files outside the states it works. One reviewer described providing MCA contracts and being told fifteen minutes later that her state was not serviced.

Score breakdown
Attorney-led 10.0
MCA focus 10.0
Volume 8.5
Fee clarity 9.0
Speed 9.5
Strengths
  • Attorneys can raise usury, move to vacate a confession of judgment, and challenge UCC-1 liens.
  • Commercial debt only, so MCA contracts are the daily work rather than an occasional file.
  • Contract review returns an answer in 24 to 48 hours.
Limitations
  • Not BBB accredited, so there is no BBB letter grade to point at.
  • No published minimum, which makes very small balances a judgment call.
Free contract review →Call (888) 837-7053 Attorney reviews the agreement before you commit to anything.
No. 02 · Best for scale

Freedom Debt Relief

The largest settlement platform in the country, built for credit cards rather than for commercial paper.

8.7
out of 10
Fee basis
15 to 25 percent of enrolled debt, plus $9.95 monthly
Speed
24 to 48 months
Minimum debt
$7,500
Attorney-led
No

Freedom Debt Relief has resolved more than $20 billion, holds an A+ BBB rating with 4.33 across 1,383 customer reviews, and publishes a cost guarantee no competitor matches. Its acceleration loans genuinely compress the escrow build.

For a New Hampshire business the fit is the problem. Fees run 15 to 25 percent of enrolled debt plus $9.95 monthly, the minimum is $7,500, and the timeline is 24 to 48 months. No attorneys, so no RSA 399-B demand, no RSA 358-A claim, no UCC-1 challenge. The right tool for mixed personal and unsecured balances, not for a funding agreement.

Score breakdown
Attorney-led 5.0
MCA focus 4.0
Volume 10.0
Fee clarity 7.5
Speed 5.5
Strengths
  • More than $20 billion resolved, the largest track record in the category.
  • A published cost guarantee, which few competitors offer.
  • BBB accredited with an A+ rating, and a long operating history.
Limitations
  • No attorneys, so usury, COJ vacatur and lien challenges are unavailable.
  • Fees are charged on enrolled debt rather than on what you actually pay.
  • Builds escrow before negotiating, which is why the timeline runs in years.
No. 03 · Best fee basis

Pacific Debt Relief

The cheapest arithmetic on the page, and the shallowest legal reach.

8.4
out of 10
Fee basis
15 to 25 percent of the settled amount
Speed
24 to 48 months
Minimum debt
$10,000
Attorney-led
No

Pacific Debt Relief charges its 15 to 25 percent on the settled amount, which on a deep discount is roughly half the alternative. Client satisfaction is the strongest on this page: 4.91 across 1,252 BBB reviews, A+ and accredited, 4.8 on Trustpilot across 2,547 reviews. More than $500 million settled.

Also not a law firm. The $10,000 minimum and the 24 to 48 month program make it a consumer unsecured solution. Reviews are not uniform either, and one Trustpilot reviewer wrote that the firm is very aggressive in getting you to sign and that afterward you get pushed to the back burner.

Score breakdown
Attorney-led 5.0
MCA focus 3.5
Volume 7.0
Fee clarity 9.5
Speed 6.0
Strengths
  • Charges on the settled amount, which is the cheaper basis on a deep discount.
  • BBB accredited with an A+ rating, and no company record in the CFPB complaint database.
Limitations
  • No attorneys, so the contract itself cannot be tested.
  • Consumer-oriented timelines of 24 to 48 months.
  • $10,000 minimum excludes smaller balances.
Fig. 06 · What clients say

What clients report

Trustpilot
4.5
33 reviews, TrustScore 4.5 of 5, verified 2026-08-25

Source →

BBB
Not Rated
Not BBB accredited; 1 customer review, no complaints shown on the profile

Source →

CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
0 complaints. No company record appears in the database.

Source →

BBB
4.33
1,383 customer reviews; BBB accredited, A+ rating

Source →

Trustpilot
4.8
2,547 reviews

Source →

BBB
4.91
1,252 customer reviews; BBB accredited, A+ rating; 10 complaints closed in three years

Source →

“I explained my situation and provided copies of our MCA contracts only to be told 15-20 minutes later that they don't service Washington State and referred to another company”
Erika H., Trustpilot, July 2026 (3 stars) · Trustpilot →
“I won't lie to you: this process is challenging. It's still taking everything we have to navigate through getting these debts resolved. But we've been able to avoid bankruptcy, and we're slowly getting debt-free.”
Mir B., Trustpilot, May 2024 (4 stars) · Trustpilot →
“The process of FDR was explained in detail. The payments, the settlements. I would recommend FDR to friends and family without hesitation.”
Verified reviewer (5 stars), Trustpilot, 2026 · Trustpilot →
“They are very aggressive in getting you to sign for the program but once your in, you Get pushed to the back burner.”
Lyn Lamig, 1 out of 5 stars, Trustpilot, May 2026 · Trustpilot →

Reviews describe other people's files. A free review describes yours.

Call (888) 837-7053
Fig. 07 · Head to head

Delancey Street vs. Freedom vs. Pacific, side by side

MCA debt relief providers compared for New Hampshire, 2026
Criterion Delancey Street Freedom Debt Relief Pacific Debt Relief
Attorney-led Yes No No
MCA specialist Exclusively Case-by-case No
Fee basis A percentage of enrolled debt 15 to 25% enrolled + $9.95/mo 15 to 25% of settled
Resolution speed 2 to 8 weeks (single MCA) 24 to 48 months 24 to 48 months
Total resolved $100M+ $20B+ $500M+
Minimum debt None published $7,500 $10,000
UCC lien challenges Yes No No
New Hampshire usury defense Yes No No
COJ vacatur Yes No No
Cost guarantee No Yes No
BBB rating Not rated, not accredited A+, accredited A+, accredited
BBB review average 5.0 (1 review) 4.33 (1,383 reviews) 4.91 (1,252 reviews)
CFPB complaints (all time) 0 1,133 (parent company) No company record

Sources: company fee disclosures, BBB profiles, and the CFPB public complaint database, read 25 August 2026. BBB review averages and CFPB totals are all time, not single year. Ratings change; verify before relying on them.

The row that decides most files is the first one. Only an attorney-led firm can test the contract.

Call (888) 837-7053
Fig. 09 · Contract check

Is your contract vulnerable?

Payments are a fixed amount every day or week
A true receivables purchase should flex with revenue.
A reconciliation request was denied or ignored
Or the contract has no workable reconciliation clause at all.
You signed a confession of judgment
A signed confession of judgment is worth having examined before it is filed.
A UCC-1 lien was filed or an account was frozen
Lien terminations get negotiated as part of the settlement.
The effective APR clears 25%
Use the calculator above. Past that line, usury arguments come into play if the advance is read as a loan.
Leverage
0/5

Toggle whatever matches your paperwork. Each signal is a lever a negotiator can pull.

Nothing is stored or sent anywhere.

Informational only

This page is editorial content about commercial debt relief providers. It is general information, not legal advice, and it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes described are not a prediction about any individual file.

Independence

No company on this page paid for placement, and rankings are not compensated. Positions may change as verified data changes.

Not a law firm

Delancey Street, Freedom Debt Relief and Pacific Debt Relief are debt relief companies, not law firms, and do not provide legal representation. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Buried in business debt?
Free · confidential · attorney reviews the agreement

Updated 24 AUG 2026