16 May 23

Indiana University of Pennsylvania Academic Misconduct Disciplinary Procedures

(0) Comment | by

Upholding and Embracing the Academic Integrity Policy at Indiana University of Pennsylvania

Academic integrity is a fundamental, non-negotiable cornerstone of scholarly pursuits that represent and instill the values of honesty, responsibility, and dedication in learning. Indiana University of Pennsylvania (IUP) takes great pride in upholding these values by establishing stringent standards for students and requiring them to exhibit unwavering integrity in all their academic activities. Needless to say, any violation of IUP’s principles of academic misconduct carries serious ramifications, profoundly impacting a student’s academic career. Thus, it’s essential for students to thoroughly comprehend the academic integrity policy, recognize the various types of misconduct, and be aware of the procedures following any infringement.

A Glimpse into the Various Forms of Academic Misconduct

Academic misconduct encompasses a broad spectrum of actions that compromise the foundational principles of academic integrity. The following categories provide an insight into these dishonest actions:


A deceitful practice where an individual utilizes someone else’s work or ideas without proper attribution and presents them as their own. Plagiarism encompasses all sources, both published and unpublished, and applies to assignments in any format, whether written, verbal, or otherwise.


The willful creation and utilization of fictitious or false information for the sole purpose of gaining an unjust academic advantage.


A dishonest attempt to portray an inflated level of knowledge or earn credit for someone else’s work through unauthorized means like impersonating someone during exams.

Technological Misconduct:

Engagement in unethical practices involving computer-related resources, such as unauthorized access to computer accounts.

Classroom Misconduct:

Any behavior resulting in significant disruptions to the learning environment in classrooms, such as blaring loud music or verbally clashing with professors.

Violations of these principles inevitably elicit disciplinary action from the relevant authorities within IUP.

Procedures in the Wake of Academic Misconduct

Upon suspecting a student’s involvement in any form of academic misconduct, instructors must confront them first by scheduling a confidential meeting and presenting the evidence. If grounds for suspicion persist after this meeting, there are two options for resolution:

1. Resolution by Documented Agreement:

The accusing administrator schedules a conference with the student in question, seeking a mutual agreement. If successful, the instructor completes a Documented Agreement Referral Form. If an agreement cannot be reached, the instructor initiates formal adjudication by filing an Academic Integrity Referral Form with the Provost’s Office within ten calendar days following the meeting.

2. Resolution by Formal Adjudication:

This course of action applies when either an agreement proves elusive, or the violations are severe enough to warrant grave sanctions, such as suspension or outright expulsion from IUP. An impartial board panel, consisting of the academic integrity board or provost, will hear testimonials from both parties and scrutinize physical and written evidence to reach a fair decision.

EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY: Sanctions for Academic Misconduct

Students found guilty of academic misconduct will face the following sanctions, depending on the resolution method:

Sanctions for Resolution by Documented Agreement:

– Single grade reduction: Earning a “0” or reduced grade on the specific assignment.
– Course grade reduction: Receiving a failing grade for all coursework in the class.
– Constructive or educational task assignment.

Sanctions for Resolution by Formal Adjudication:

– The letter of warning: A stern reminder of the consequences of repeated non-compliance with university policies.
– Disciplinary probation.
– Involuntary withdrawal from programs.
– Suspension: Temporary removal from IUP.
– Expulsion: Permanent removal from IUP.
– Rescission of a degree.

Appeals: A Path to Redemption

The appeals process caters exclusively to students subjected to decisions made against them through formal adjudication. These students have ten calendar days to file an appeal with the appropriate authorities.

In Conclusion: Maintaining and Upholding Academic Integrity at IUP

Academic misconduct undermines the core principles of academic integrity, which hinge on honesty, responsibility, and ethical behavior in the pursuit of knowledge. As such, it is of utmost importance to adhere to IUP’s policies governing academic work to uphold the institution’s high-quality standards. Disciplinary actions meted out to violators can have far-reaching consequences on students’ academic futures, making it imperative for them to familiarize themselves with the academic integrity policy and consult legal professionals for guidance regarding academic sanctions like expulsion or program withdrawals. Remember, knowledge is power.

Indiana University of Pennsylvania Academic Misconduct Disciplinary Procedures

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *