24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

How Lawyers Defend Clients Against Medical Billing Fraud

How Lawyers Defend Clients Against Medical Billing Fraud

Medical billing fraud is a serious issue that costs the healthcare system billions of dollars every year. From small clinics to large hospital systems, healthcare providers can face allegations of fraudulent billing practices. When this happens, specialized lawyers step in to defend them.Defending against allegations of medical billing fraud requires an in-depth understanding of complex healthcare regulations and billing procedures. Lawyers need to examine the details of each case to build strong defenses for their clients. Some common defenses include lack of intent to defraud, billing errors rather than outright fraud, or issues with medical coding and documentation.

Investigating the Allegations

The first step any lawyer takes when defending a client against medical billing fraud allegations is to thoroughly investigate the claims. This starts with reviewing the specifics of what the client has been accused of doing.Some of the most common fraudulent billing practices lawyers see include:

  • Upcoding – Billing for more expensive services than were actually performed
  • Unbundling – Billing for multiple components of a procedure separately rather than using a single global code
  • Phantom billing – Billing for services that were never performed
  • Kickbacks – Receiving payments to refer patients for certain services

Lawyers need to determine exactly what conduct their client is alleged to have engaged in. They also gather information on the scope of the allegations – does it involve a single claim or hundreds of patient cases over many years? Understanding the extent of the potential fraud is critical for building an appropriate defense.

Assessing Intent

A key element prosecutors must prove in any medical billing fraud case is intent to defraud. Showing that the client made an error or mistake rather than deliberately trying to falsify claims can be an effective defense.Lawyers gather evidence about their client’s billing and documentation processes to build this defense. They look for potential gaps in employee training, complicated new billing guidelines the client may have struggled with, or even software glitches that led to inaccurate claims.Sometimes data entry mistakes happen that lead to upcoding or errors in billed service codes. While this is still problematic, proving it was not intentional fraud can help secure a better outcome for the client.

Navigating Complex Billing Rules

Medical billing coding and documentation processes are complicated, with intricate rules set by Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers. Lawyers defending billing fraud cases often bring in expert witnesses to explain how errors can happen even when providers aim to follow all guidelines.Showing that the client made efforts to properly train staff and comply with constantly changing billing rules can demonstrate they did not intentionally misrepresent claims. While ignorance of the rules is not a defense, proving billing mistakes stemmed from the complexity of the system can help lawyers negotiate reduced penalties for clients.

Conducting an Internal Investigation

In some cases, lawyers will conduct or oversee an internal investigation within the client’s organization to better understand exactly what occurred. Reviewing patient records, internal communications, billing documents, and more helps them piece together an accurate timeline of events.This evidence gathering also aims to identify weaknesses in processes that may have enabled fraudulent billing practices. Determining the root cause of compliance breakdowns is important for demonstrating the client is committed to correcting them going forward.

Cooperation and Compliance

Proving a client is actively cooperating with authorities and instituting stronger compliance programs often helps secure better outcomes in billing fraud cases. Rather than denying any wrongdoing, lawyers can negotiate settlements that include ongoing monitoring and auditing requirements instead of harsh penalties.Highlighting compliance training initiatives, new patient documentation procedures, more rigorous claim audits, and other corrective measures shows the client takes allegations seriously. This good faith can go a long way during settlement negotiations.

Settlement Considerations

Fighting extensive billing fraud allegations in court often proves difficult, so settlement is usually the best option for resolving cases efficiently. Lawyers aim to negotiate agreements that avoid program exclusion for healthcare clients – being banned from Medicare and Medicaid can destroy a medical practice.Settlement terms typically include:

  • Repayment of improper payments
  • Fines and penalties
  • Ongoing external auditing
  • Corrective action plans
  • Compliance monitoring

Avoiding costly litigation and exclusion allows clients to move forward and implement stronger controls to prevent future billing issues. Lawyers play a critical role in securing these favorable outcomes through experienced negotiation.

Individual Liability

In some cases, individual executives, doctors, or billing managers may face personal liability for organizational fraud. Prosecutors may allege they participated directly in illicit activities or failed to provide appropriate supervision and oversight.Defense lawyers conduct detailed reviews of each individual’s actual involvement. Demonstrating limited knowledge or control over specific billing activities helps reduce personal exposure. Negotiating plea deals or deferred prosecution agreements also minimizes damage to individual reputations and careers.Defending complex medical billing fraud requires in-depth healthcare regulatory expertise and negotiating skills. Skilled lawyers carefully investigate each case while implementing strategies to mitigate penalties and protect client interests. Their guidance helps resolve allegations efficiently so clients can learn from mistakes and improve operations going forward.

Common Legal Defenses Against Medical Billing Fraud  1

Medical billing fraud allegations can have serious legal and financial consequences. Providers accused of fraudulent billing often turn to experienced attorneys to help them build a strong defense and achieve the best possible outcome. Some of the most common legal defenses lawyers use in these cases include:

No Intent to Defraud

Proving intent is a key requirement for a medical fraud conviction. Demonstrating the provider simply made an error or billing mistake rather than deliberately falsifying claims is an effective defense. Lawyers gather documentation about employee training, new coding guideline rollouts, and auditing processes to show appropriate policies were in place. While billing errors may still warrant fines or repayments, removing the fraud element helps mitigate penalties and criminal charges.

Billing Noncompliance vs Fraud

Allegations may stem from general misunderstanding or noncompliance with complicated billing regulations rather than outright fraud. Lawyers work with billing experts to explain how errors and oversights can occur even in good faith. While clients may need to repay disputed claims and face fines, showing they tried to follow complex rules helps prove there was no malicious intent.

Rogue Employees

When individual staff members intentionally falsify billing outside established policies, the “rogue employee” defense shifts liability away from the organization and senior management. Lawyers demonstrate how proper training, auditing, and supervision policies were in place. When a single employee elects to disregard compliance rules, it helps mitigate institutional culpability.

Software and System Errors

With medical billing heavily reliant on complex software, glitches and technology issues can contribute to inaccurate claims. Lawyers investigate a provider’s systems to find potential problems that led to overbilling without intent to defraud. While systems need correction and overpayments refunded, technology issues show the provider did not deliberately falsify bills.Building an effective legal defense requires a detailed investigation into the specific allegations and their root causes. Lawyers routinely employ strategies focused on intent, compliance failures vs fraud, rogue actors, and system errors. Their negotiations often lead to reduced penalties and avoidance of criminal charges through settlements.While billing fraud allegations create legal and financial risk, skilled legal defense helps mitigate damage and resolves cases favorably. Experienced lawyers are invaluable advocates for providers facing complex medical billing disputes.

Healthcare Fraud Laws and Penalties  2

Several federal laws impose civil and criminal penalties for healthcare fraud offenses:False Claims Act – Imposes civil liability and damages for knowingly submitting false Medicare or Medicaid claims. Violations incur fines between $5,500-$11,000 plus treble (triple) damages.Anti-Kickback Statute – Criminalizes receiving or paying anything of value to influence referrals for federally-funded healthcare services. Conviction can mean fines up to $25,000 and 5 years imprisonment.Physician Self-Referral Law (Stark Law) – Prohibits doctors from referring Medicare patients to services in which they or their family have a financial interest. Violators face denial of payments, civil monetary penalties up to $24,253, and exclusion from federal healthcare programs.Exclusion – The Office of Inspector General has authority to exclude individuals and entities convicted of certain fraud offenses from participating in Medicare, Medicaid and all other federal healthcare programs. This can essentially put a healthcare provider out of business so lawyers defend vigorously against exclusion threats.State Laws – Most states have laws similar to the federal statutes above imposing both criminal and civil liability for medical billing fraud. Penalties at the state level vary but typically include hefty fines and potential imprisonment.The severity of sentences depends on the extent of fraud and whether aggravating factors like patient harm or organized criminal activity were involved. Lawyers aim to avoid exclusion plus minimize fines and jail time through strong legal defenses and negotiating favorable settlements.

Settlements and Resolutions in Medical Fraud Cases  3

Facing criminal prosecution or trial for medical billing fraud allegations can be a lengthy, expensive, and high-risk endeavor. Providers accused of fraudulent billing often achieve better outcomes through settling cases outside of court.In settlements negotiations, healthcare lawyers pursue agreements that:

  • Avoid program exclusion – Being banned from participating in Medicare and Medicaid is often a fate worse than prison for medical professionals. Keeping this access is critical.
  • Prevent criminal charges or convictions – Deals that drop or defer prosecution in exchange for repayment and compliance remedies leave no permanent criminal record.
  • Minimize financial liability – Negotiations focus on reducing treble damages, interest, fines and penalties as much as possible.
  • Establish reasonable corrective action – The government demands stronger compliance programs after fraud allegations, but settlements keep auditing, staff training, and process improvements within limits.
  • End protracted legal proceedings – Quick resolution allows providers to move on while implementing controls to prevent issues in the future.

Even with strong defense arguments, the expense, uncertainty, and public scrutiny associated with fraud prosecutions or trials often makes settlement the most prudent option. Experienced lawyers negotiate to resolve these cases while limiting damage to the provider’s finances, reputation, and continued operations.

Using Data Analytics to Detect and Prevent Fraud  4

Sophisticated data analytics techniques can help healthcare organizations detect and prevent fraudulent billing activity. Lawyers often advise implementing advanced analytics solutions that:Spot Anomalies – Identify outliers and exceptions in billing data that may indicate potential abuse or errors. Dashboard visualizations spotlight unusual trends.Predict Risks – Use algorithms to score providers based on characteristics of past fraudsters. Proactively flag high-risk areas.Analyze Networks – Map relationships across providers, patients, pharmacies, etc. to uncover suspicious patterns and connections that enable fraud schemes.Continuously Monitor – Establish ongoing monitoring programs rather than periodic audits or spot checks. Regularly mine billing data to identify new risks.Automate Reviews – Machine learning algorithms can automatically assess claims and supporting documentation to validate proper coding, medically necessity, etc.Sophisticated analytics enable lawyers to demonstrate clients have state-of-the-art controls against fraudulent billing once corrected. These advanced systems also help prevent issues proactively rather than waiting until fraud occurs.

Medical Fraud Defense Lawyers Provide Critical Guidance

Defending complex billing fraud accusations requires navigating a maze of healthcare regulations and legal proceedings. Skilled lawyers intimately understand this intricate landscape. Their specialized expertise offers the best chance to resolve allegations favorably – avoiding harsh penalties while implementing stronger controls for the future.For providers facing fraud investigations or charges, legal guidance from beginning to end is critical. Relying on experienced counsel maximizes the potential for the best possible outcome.

References

1

 https://www.egattorneys.com/defenses-medical-fraud-charges-california

2

 https://www.delawllp.com/healthcare-fraud-false-claims-act/

3

 https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/charges-brought-against-34-individuals-alleged-west-coast-medicare-and-medicaid-fraud-schemes

4

 https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/what-should-health-care-organizations-do-reduce-billing-fraud-and-abuse/2020-03

Schedule Your Consultation Now