24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

How Federal Defense Lawyers Challenge Informants and Snitches

How Federal Defense Lawyers Challenge Informants and Snitches

Informants, also known as confidential informants or snitches, are often key witnesses for federal prosecutors in criminal cases. However, their testimony comes with major credibility issues that defense attorneys can exploit. Here’s an overview of how federal defense lawyers work to challenge and discredit informant witnesses.

Understanding Informants in Federal Cases

Informants go by many names – confidential informants (CIs), cooperating witnesses, snitches, rats. They are defendants or suspects who agree to provide information to law enforcement in exchange for potential benefits, like reduced charges or sentences.In federal cases involving organized crime, drug trafficking, terrorism, and public corruption, informants are commonly used by agencies like the FBI, DEA, and ATF. Prosecutors may rely heavily on informant testimony to build their case, even when there is little other evidence.However, informants are not considered the most credible witnesses. They have strong incentives to fabricate information against the defendant in order to receive rewards from the government. A skilled federal defense lawyer will work to expose these motives and incentives on cross-examination.

Common Defense Strategies Against Informants

There are various approaches defense attorneys can take to challenge jailhouse informant testimony:

Attack the Informant’s Credibility

A top priority is undermining the informant’s credibility by exposing their background. The defense will dig into the informant’s criminal history and dishonest acts they’ve committed in the past. This can suggest they are unreliable and willing to lie to benefit themselves.The attorney may also highlight inconsistencies in the informant’s story compared to other evidence or past statements. Another tactic is revealing if the informant has falsely testified or fabricated confessions in other cases. This can establish a pattern of deception.

Question the Informant’s Incentives

The defense will emphasize the strong incentives the informant has to fabricate testimony against the defendant. This includes highlighting any compensation, rewards, or benefits the informant received or expects from the government in exchange for cooperating.Even if no explicit promises were made, the informant likely assumes their cooperation will be rewarded down the line. The defense argues this gives them a motive to lie and tell prosecutors what they want to hear.

Challenge the Informant’s Access and Opportunity

For the informant’s testimony to be credible, they need to have had sufficient access to the defendant to hear the incriminating statements they claim were made. The defense attorney will closely examine if the informant realistically could have interacted with the defendant before reporting the confession.If the informant was never housed with the defendant in jail, for example, their alleged jailhouse confession would be dubious. Impeaching the informant’s access helps undermine their account.

Allege Coaching by Prosecutors

Skilled defense lawyers will explore whether the informant was coached by prosecutors on what to say. If evidence suggests the informant was told specific details about the crime or defendant before “coming forward”, it indicates their testimony was pre-planned rather than based on a real confession.Attorneys may also argue the informant had access to the defendant’s case file and other privileged information that could help fabricate false testimony.

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
2024-03-21
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
2024-03-18
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
2024-03-18
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
2024-03-15
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
2024-03-15
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
2024-03-12
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
2024-03-12
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
2024-02-28
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
2024-02-24
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

Present Experts on Informant Unreliability

Some courts allow the defense to call expert witnesses to testify about the inherent unreliability of jailhouse informants. These experts can cite statistics and psychology research showing informants frequently fabricate confessions to gain rewards. This helps contextualize why the jury should be skeptical.

Seek Exclusion of the Testimony

In some circumstances, defense counsel may argue the informant’s testimony is so unreliable it should be excluded entirely and deemed inadmissible. For example, if the informant was acting as a government agent to deliberately elicit information without Miranda warnings. Or if their story has changed so drastically it is patently false.

Advise the Client Not to Testify

If the prosecution’s case hinges mainly on a shaky informant, the defense may recommend the defendant not testify. This avoids opening the door to cross-examination and preserves the focus on discrediting the informant’s account. The jury may have reasonable doubt if the informant is all the government has.

Why Informant Testimony is Unreliable

There are inherent reasons why testimony from criminal informants should be viewed skeptically, which the defense highlights:

  • Incentives to Lie. Informants have strong incentives to provide false or embellished testimony against the defendant in order to gain rewards and benefits for themselves.
  • Criminal History. Many informants have extensive criminal backgrounds, past lies and frauds that compromise their veracity.
  • Evasion of Prosecution. Informants may fabricate confessions to avoid prosecution for their own crimes and divert law enforcement attention onto others.
  • Vengeful Motives. Some informants testify falsely out of vengeance or grudges against the defendant rather than a pursuit of truth.
  • Mental Illness. Studies show many informants suffer from mental illnesses that impact memory and perception. This calls into question the accuracy of their claims.
  • Suggestibility. Informants eager to please prosecutors may have been swayed by leading questions, unintentional cues, or assumptions of guilt.
  • Lack Corroboration. Jailhouse confessions are often uncorroborated by any other evidence and rely wholly on the informant’s word.
  • Perjury. Threats of prosecution for perjury are not a strong deterrent for informants who are already facing serious charges with long sentences.
  • Difficult Verification. It is very challenging to definitively verify whether an informant is telling the truth about a confession or fabricated the story. Their testimony often cannot be confirmed.

Defense attorneys emphasize these factors to create doubt around informants as credible witnesses. While informants play a key role in many federal cases, their problematic nature as witnesses makes them vulnerable on cross-examination.

Conclusion

Informants incentivized by rewards and benefits present major credibility issues in federal criminal trials. Skilled defense lawyers understand how to strategically undermine and discredit informant testimony by exposing their motives, inconsistencies, background, and lack of veracity. Robustly challenging the credibility of informants can create the reasonable doubt necessary for an acquittal.

Schedule Your Consultation Now