The calls started at 7 AM. By noon, the threats were explicit. By the end of the week, they had called your customer. The threats are not legal. Neither are some of the other things they did.
MCA funders and their collection agents sometimes cross the line from aggressive collection into illegal conduct. The line exists. It is defined by federal law, state law, and regulatory guidance. When the funder or its agent crosses it, the violation does not merely offend your sense of fairness. It creates a legal claim that you can assert — both as a defense to the underlying obligation and as an independent cause of action for damages. The funder’s misconduct becomes your leverage.
Common Illegal Practices
Threatening criminal prosecution for failure to repay a civil obligation. An MCA is a commercial contract. Failure to repay it is a breach of contract, not a crime. Threats of criminal charges — arrest, jail, prosecution, reporting to the district attorney — are tools of intimidation, not statements of legal reality. Making such threats may constitute extortion or criminal coercion depending on the jurisdiction and the specific language used.
Contacting third parties about the debt. Calling your customers, your vendors, your landlord, your employees, or your family members to discuss, disclose, or imply the existence of your MCA obligation may violate state and federal fair debt collection practices laws. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act restricts communications with third parties by debt collectors. State laws may impose additional restrictions. Whether the FDCPA applies depends on whether the collector is a “debt collector” within the statute’s definition and whether the MCA is a “debt” — questions that have been the subject of litigation and that may be resolved in your favor depending on the jurisdiction and the facts.
Debiting accounts without authorization. If you revoked ACH authorization — by notifying both the funder and your bank in writing — and the funder continues to initiate debits against your account, the unauthorized debit may violate the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the NACHA operating rules governing ACH transactions, and state consumer protection statutes. The revocation must be effective, and the procedures must be followed correctly. But if the revocation was proper and the debits continued, each unauthorized debit is a separate violation.
Misrepresenting the amount owed. Inflating the balance with unauthorized fees, penalties, or charges not specified in the agreement is a deceptive practice. Claiming a balance that does not account for payments already made is a misrepresentation. Threatening legal action based on an inflated balance is a compounding deception.
Harassment. Excessive calls, abusive language, profanity, threats of violence, threats to reputation, and other forms of harassment may violate state and federal debt collection laws, state consumer protection statutes, and common law torts including intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Documenting the Conduct
Every illegal collection practice requires evidence. Save every voicemail. Screenshot every text message. Print every email. Photograph every letter. Note every phone call with the date, time, caller’s name or number, and a contemporaneous summary of what was said. If your state permits one-party consent recording, record the calls. If it does not, take detailed notes during or immediately after each call.