Fighting Back Against Illegal MCA Collection Practices

The calls started at 7 AM. By noon, the threats were explicit. By the end of the week, they had called your customer. The threats are not legal. Neither are some of the other things they did.

MCA funders and their collection agents sometimes cross the line from aggressive collection into illegal conduct. The line exists. It is defined by federal law, state law, and regulatory guidance. When the funder or its agent crosses it, the violation does not merely offend your sense of fairness. It creates a legal claim that you can assert — both as a defense to the underlying obligation and as an independent cause of action for damages. The funder’s misconduct becomes your leverage.

Common Illegal Practices

Threatening criminal prosecution for failure to repay a civil obligation. An MCA is a commercial contract. Failure to repay it is a breach of contract, not a crime. Threats of criminal charges — arrest, jail, prosecution, reporting to the district attorney — are tools of intimidation, not statements of legal reality. Making such threats may constitute extortion or criminal coercion depending on the jurisdiction and the specific language used.

Contacting third parties about the debt. Calling your customers, your vendors, your landlord, your employees, or your family members to discuss, disclose, or imply the existence of your MCA obligation may violate state and federal fair debt collection practices laws. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act restricts communications with third parties by debt collectors. State laws may impose additional restrictions. Whether the FDCPA applies depends on whether the collector is a “debt collector” within the statute’s definition and whether the MCA is a “debt” — questions that have been the subject of litigation and that may be resolved in your favor depending on the jurisdiction and the facts.

Debiting accounts without authorization. If you revoked ACH authorization — by notifying both the funder and your bank in writing — and the funder continues to initiate debits against your account, the unauthorized debit may violate the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the NACHA operating rules governing ACH transactions, and state consumer protection statutes. The revocation must be effective, and the procedures must be followed correctly. But if the revocation was proper and the debits continued, each unauthorized debit is a separate violation.

Misrepresenting the amount owed. Inflating the balance with unauthorized fees, penalties, or charges not specified in the agreement is a deceptive practice. Claiming a balance that does not account for payments already made is a misrepresentation. Threatening legal action based on an inflated balance is a compounding deception.

Harassment. Excessive calls, abusive language, profanity, threats of violence, threats to reputation, and other forms of harassment may violate state and federal debt collection laws, state consumer protection statutes, and common law torts including intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Documenting the Conduct

Every illegal collection practice requires evidence. Save every voicemail. Screenshot every text message. Print every email. Photograph every letter. Note every phone call with the date, time, caller’s name or number, and a contemporaneous summary of what was said. If your state permits one-party consent recording, record the calls. If it does not, take detailed notes during or immediately after each call.

The documentation is the evidence. Without it, the claim is your word against the collector’s. With it, the claim is supported by a contemporaneous record that a court or arbitrator can evaluate.

Your Remedies

An attorney can evaluate whether the collection practices violate applicable law, send a cease-and-desist letter that puts the collector on formal notice, file complaints with the appropriate state and federal regulatory agencies, and assert counterclaims in any pending or future legal proceeding. The counterclaims may seek actual damages, statutory damages, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees, depending on the statute violated.

DEFENSE TEAM SPOTLIGHT

Todd Spodek

Lead Attorney & Founder

Featured on Netflix's "Inventing Anna," Todd Spodek brings decades of high-stakes criminal defense experience. His aggressive approach has secured dismissals and acquittals in cases others deemed unwinnable.

NY Bar Admitted Multi-State Licensed Federal Courts

Meet the Full Team

In some cases, the counterclaim exceeds the amount the funder claims you owe. The collector’s illegal conduct creates a liability for the funder that may offset or exceed the underlying obligation. The funder came after you for $50,000. Your counterclaim for illegal collection practices may be worth more. The calculus of the dispute changes entirely.

The funder’s leverage depends on your silence. The funder assumes you will absorb the calls, the threats, and the pressure without responding. The leverage dissolves when the funder’s own conduct becomes the subject of legal scrutiny and financial exposure.

There is a broader principle at work. MCA collection practices operate in a space that many funders treat as unregulated. The funder believes the MCA is not a loan, the collector believes the FDCPA does not apply, and the business owner believes there is no recourse. Some of those beliefs are wrong. The legal landscape is evolving. Courts are applying consumer protection frameworks to MCA collection. State attorneys general are investigating collection practices. The regulatory vacuum that funders relied upon is filling. The business owner who documents illegal conduct and asserts legal claims is not only protecting themselves. They are contributing to a legal record that protects the next business owner in the same position.