The withdrawal exceeds the deposit. Every day, the account moves in one direction.
This is not a cash flow problem in any meaningful sense. A cash flow problem implies a timing mismatch: money arrives late, expenses arrive early, and the gap can be bridged. When the daily MCA withdrawal exceeds daily revenue, the gap does not close. It widens. The business is consuming itself to service a debt that was priced for a revenue level that no longer exists.
In seven of the nine cases we reviewed with this profile last quarter, the business owner had been subsidizing the account from personal savings, credit cards, or loans from family members. The subsidy delays the default. It does not prevent it. And it depletes the personal resources that an attorney could otherwise use to fund a settlement.
Calculate Your Exact Daily Shortfall
Before anything else, determine the number. Total daily MCA withdrawals minus average daily net revenue equals the daily shortfall. If the shortfall is $200, the business is losing $200 per day. In thirty days, that is $6,000. In ninety days, that is $18,000. This is money the business does not have, will not generate, and cannot recover.
The number is clarifying. It removes the ambiguity that permits delay. When the daily shortfall is visible, the urgency of intervention becomes self-evident.
Stop Subsidizing the MCA with Personal Funds
I understand why you are doing it. The personal savings keep the ACH from failing, which keeps the default from triggering, which keeps the judgment from filing. Each day the payment clears, the crisis feels deferred.
It is not deferred. It is financed. By you. With money that could fund a settlement, retain an attorney, or sustain the business through a restructuring.
Every dollar of personal savings spent to service an MCA payment is a dollar unavailable for the resolution of the MCA obligation. An attorney-negotiated settlement at forty cents on the dollar is less expensive than three months of subsidized payments that eventually fail anyway. The personal savings are more valuable as a settlement fund than as a temporary bridge.