Three funders are withdrawing from the same account every morning, and the total exceeds what the business deposits in a week.
This is not a cash flow problem. This is a structural failure that will resolve itself in one of two ways: the business intervenes, or the account empties and the defaults trigger simultaneously. There is no third option in which the situation corrects on its own.
The arithmetic is simple enough. Each MCA purchased a percentage of your future receivables, but the daily fixed ACH withdrawal does not fluctuate with revenue. When you signed the first agreement, the withdrawal was manageable. When you signed the second (often at the suggestion of the first funder, or a broker affiliated with them), the combined withdrawal consumed your margin. The third advance, the one that was supposed to stabilize everything, eliminated it.
In 2025, we reviewed a file where a landscaping company in New Jersey was servicing four simultaneous MCAs. The combined daily withdrawal was $1,740. The company's average daily revenue was $2,100. After the withdrawals, after payroll, after fuel costs, the owner had forty-three dollars a day to operate a business that employed nine people.
Forty-three dollars.
Stop the Bleeding Without Triggering the Avalanche
The first instinct, and the most dangerous one, is to revoke ACH authorizations across all accounts. This is the financial equivalent of pulling every fire alarm in a building simultaneously. Each revocation constitutes a default under its respective agreement. Each default triggers its own acceleration clause. Each funder, now aware that you have taken an adversarial posture, will race to be the first to file a judgment and freeze the account.
The first funder to obtain a judgment and serve a restraining notice on your bank gains priority. The others will follow, but the first arrival claims the remaining funds. This is not collaboration among creditors. It is competition, and the merchant is the territory being divided.
You do not win a war with four creditors by attacking all of them on the same morning.
The correct approach is sequential, not simultaneous, and it requires legal counsel to orchestrate. An attorney can send a formal notice to each funder, assert the reconciliation rights embedded in each contract, and create a documented record that the merchant is acting in good faith to address the shortfall. This is not a guarantee of cooperation. It is a strategic positioning that constrains the funder's options if the matter reaches a court.
Separate Your Operating Funds
We have written about this before. It bears repeating because the failure to do it is, in nearly every case we handle, the single decision that converts a manageable crisis into an unrecoverable one.
Open a new business account at a different bank. Begin directing new receivables, customer payments, and incoming deposits to this account. The original account, the one linked to the ACH authorizations, remains open. It is not closed. It is not hidden. It simply no longer contains the funds required to keep the business alive.