FEDERAL CRIMINAL DEFENSE

Federal Sentencing

Strategic advocacy for favorable sentencing outcomes in federal criminal cases.

10,000+ Cases Handled
50+ Years Experience
Nationwide Federal Courts
24/7 Availability

Understanding Federal Sentencing

Federal sentencing is a complex process governed by the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, mandatory minimum statutes, and a growing body of case law. The sentencing phase of a federal case is often the most important, as the difference between effective and ineffective sentencing advocacy can mean years or even decades in prison. Our firm dedicates substantial resources to sentencing preparation and advocacy, treating every sentencing hearing as a critical opportunity to fight for our clients’ futures.

The Federal Sentencing Guidelines

The Federal Sentencing Guidelines provide a framework for calculating the recommended sentencing range based on the offense level and the defendant’s criminal history category. The offense level is determined by the base offense level for the crime of conviction, adjusted for specific offense characteristics (such as the amount of financial loss, the use of weapons, or the number of victims), role in the offense, acceptance of responsibility, and other factors. While the Guidelines are advisory rather than mandatory after the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, they remain highly influential and serve as the starting point for every federal sentence.

Departures and Variances

Federal judges have the authority to depart from the Guidelines range based on specific factors identified in the Guidelines themselves, or to vary from the range based on the broader sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. Section 3553(a). These factors include the nature and circumstances of the offense, the history and characteristics of the defendant, the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense and provide just punishment, the need for deterrence, the need to protect the public, and the need to provide the defendant with needed training or treatment. Effective sentencing advocacy requires presenting compelling arguments and evidence under these factors.

Our Sentencing Approach

Our sentencing preparation begins early and is thorough. We retain sentencing mitigation specialists to conduct comprehensive social history investigations, identifying factors such as childhood trauma, mental health conditions, substance abuse history, military service, and community contributions that can support arguments for a below-Guidelines sentence. We also challenge the Presentence Investigation Report prepared by the Probation Office, object to sentencing enhancements, and present expert testimony when appropriate.

Whether you are facing sentencing after a guilty plea or a trial conviction, our firm will fight for the most favorable sentence possible. Federal sentencing is too important and too complex to leave to chance.

Potential Penalties

Offense Level Penalties
Guidelines Range Calculated based on offense level and criminal history (0 months to life)
Mandatory Minimums Statutory minimums that the judge cannot go below (absent exceptions)
Supervised Release 1 to 5 years following imprisonment (up to life for sex offenses)
Restitution Mandatory in fraud and other cases; can reach millions of dollars

Defense Strategies We Use

Comprehensive mitigation investigation and presentation
Challenging Guidelines calculations and enhancements
Arguing for below-Guidelines variances under Section 3553(a)
Retaining expert witnesses for mental health and other mitigation
Negotiating cooperation agreements for substantial assistance departures
Challenging the Presentence Investigation Report

The Federal Criminal Process

Understanding what happens next is critical. Here is a step-by-step overview of the federal criminal process — and where an experienced attorney can make the biggest impact.

1

Investigation

Federal agencies (FBI, DEA, IRS) build a case. You may not know you're under investigation. Early attorney involvement can make a critical difference.

Frequently Asked Questions

No. Since the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in United States v. Booker, the Guidelines are advisory. Judges must calculate and consider the Guidelines range but can impose a sentence above or below that range based on the factors in 18 U.S.C. Section 3553(a). However, the Guidelines remain highly influential and are the starting point for every federal sentence.
Under Section 5K1.1 of the Guidelines, the government can move for a below-Guidelines sentence if the defendant provides substantial assistance in the investigation or prosecution of others. This is the only way to get below a mandatory minimum sentence (other than the safety valve). The decision to file a 5K1.1 motion rests solely with the prosecutor.
It depends on the offense and Guidelines range. If the Guidelines range includes Zone A (0-6 months), probation may be an option. For offenses with mandatory minimum sentences, probation is not available. An experienced federal defense attorney can evaluate your case and determine whether probation is a realistic possibility.

Todd Spodek in the Media

Watch our managing partner discuss criminal defense strategy on major news networks.

Why Clients Trust Spodek Law Group
Todd Spodek — Federal Sentencing Strategy
Fox News: Federal Sentencing Guidelines
NewsNation: Mandatory Minimums Debate
Understanding the Federal Sentencing Table
Downward Departures & Variances Explained

Fighting Federal Sentencing Charges?

Don't face these serious charges alone. Our experienced attorneys are available 24/7 to discuss your case.

Call (212) 300-5196